User talk:Mridul Jaiman

April 2020
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Law of attraction (New Thought). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. catchyoursolution.online Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Law of attraction (New Thought). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:51, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Requirements to be unblocked
I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you as you have not adequately addressed the reason for your. Please state clearly that you will not edit about catchyoursolution or any other entity with which you have an off-wiki connection. Please state clearly that you will not link to catchyoursolution or any other entity with which you have an off-wiki connection. Please describe what constructive edits you would make. -- Deep fried okra  User talk:Deepfriedokra 14:56, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)