User talk:Mridusinha

AfD nomination of Adirondack Architecture
An editor has nominated Adirondack Architecture, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trademark Electronic Search System


A tag has been placed on Trademark Electronic Search System, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Keystoner idin (speak) 04:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo of Entrepreneurs' Organization.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Entrepreneurs' Organization.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of SynapseIndia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SynapseIndia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SynapseIndia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. § FreeRangeFrog croak 18:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Dear § FreeRangeFrog croak,

Please suggest what particular items if edited or added, you think would make this page more notable, I would willingly do that. The business is notable and have very good partners around the world, may be I'm just missing on good content/references on wikipage. Mridu 10:53, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Based upon your statement

Hello, Mridusinha. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  16:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for leaving the message on my talk page. I noticed the mistake in my comment and have updated it. Also, I'm NOT currently associated with the business in anyway, but yes, my reference as "our own page" in my comment was actually a mistake and goes way back when I had been their employee, but quit the job several years ago after having a baby. Since I'm well aware of the business and their notability, last year while reading a few wiki pages, I found that they do have mentions but do not have a page, hence created one. I'm not completely aware of all wiki policies so as the editors are suggesting I'm editing the article to make it inline to the wiki policies. Any comment from your end would be appreciated.Mridu 08:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Entrepreneurs' Organization


The article Entrepreneurs' Organization has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:N and WP:CORP only passing mentions in third party sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  16:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC)  --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  16:10, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shamit Khemka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Police Academy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Shamit Khemka.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shamit Khemka.jpg, which you've attributed to Shamit Khemka. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Shamit Khemka.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shamit Khemka.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Chandramauli Charitable Trust


The article International Chandramauli Charitable Trust has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable. The only reference that's not self-sourced, BBC News, is about a woman running a marathon, and only mentions the ICC Trust in passing. The other two references are to a representative of the Trust speaking on Youtube, and to a paid WordPress promotional press release (SynapseIndia). Using Wordpress and Youtube as "sources" is a good indication that no actual third-party sources exist, and sure enough, Google finds nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bishonen &#124; talk 14:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of International Chandramauli Charitable Trust for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Chandramauli Charitable Trust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/International Chandramauli Charitable Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Regarding User:Bishonen
Bishonen is not a vandal. Read WP:Assume good faith (a foundational site principle) and WP:NOTVAND. Bishonen is actually an administrator, and becoming an administrator requires approval from a significant portion of the Wikipedia community. Not just anyone becomes an administrator.

You seem to have misinterpreted some of the humor on Bishonen's user page as accusations of misbehavior. A review of Bishonen's block log indicates that the first block was because she "Asked to be blocked, to experience it," and the third was a clear accident. Your accusations that Bishonen is secretly working for some firm that manipulates Wikipedia would be a ridiculous conspiracy theory if it didn't smell like Psychological projection.

In short, I strongly advise you stop acting like Bishonen is doing anything wrong, because Bishonen isn't doing anything wrong here. You are, however. Ian.thomson (talk) 05:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I understood that I might have been misunderstanding Bishonen after your response on teahouse. Also I didn't have any intentions to malign the admins name or account hence I refrain to to mention it on the post. The admins comment on my Afd page led me to believe that theadmin is desperate to have it deleted despite the references. Thanks. Mridu 06:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please sign your posts
Did you see the "Your recent edits" section above? You've been editing Wikipedia since 2006. Please sign your posts properly. Bishonen &#124; talk 12:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC).

I had been adding four tildes but it is not appearing properly as here Mridu 18:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC) I'll try using the button however 'with all due respect' you seem to be determined to have my account blocked, so how does it matter. --Mridu 18:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)