User talk:Mriganka shekhar sarma

March 2016
Hello, I'm Largoplazo. An edit that you recently made to Talk:Wikipedia seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:51, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Mriganka shekhar sarma, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bandipur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Dcirovic (talk) 16:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Bandipur, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tarakeswar Temple into Hooghly district. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)