User talk:Mrkite412/Monroe's motivated sequence

Peer Review
I liked how you included a study to show how they were more influenced by the explanation using Monroe’s motivated sequence. I would suggest you add more details about why the explanation using Monroe’s motivated sequence was extremely higher for them to understand. This would give the reader a better understanding. The most important thing you could do to improve the article would be to add more details about the study. Other than that, great job!. Peerdrew12 (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi I'm from Pitt-greensburg and I'm supposed to review your page

I like how you included a study that shows how people were influenced by using Monroe's motivated sequence. I also think that the examples that you used were very detailed and it also helps the readers understand how this study is used. I do suggest that you list the steps for this study. I also think that you could add more details on the finder. For example you could add what made Alan Monroe come up with this theory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pudge10 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
I like that you are including what seems to be a very detailed example to help readers of the article understand how Monroe's Motivated Sequence is used. A recommendation I have for it is to try listing out each of the steps for the study. For example, how did the researchers get the college students attention, define their need, provide satisfaction and a visualization, and what did the researchers do to get the students to act. I also think a way to improve the overall article is to include more detailed information of Alan Monroe. How did he come up with this sequence? What led him to the discovery of it? How did he use it? I think this will help give you a stronger article. -Accountname43 (talk) 20:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)