User talk:Mrmedit

Reply
The point of the speedy deletion procedure is that articles deemed to meet the criteria can be deleted immediately and without discussion. Normally I am happy to sandbox deleted text for users to work on further. The exception is articles like this which are essentially close paraphrasing of copyrighted material. You would do better to start from scratch  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Copyrighted text is not allowed anywhere in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * You also did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You gave references, but they were not in-line, so it was difficult to know which parts of the text each was supporting.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Lots of aims and claims, few hard facts


 * looking again, I may have been a bit hard on you. I'd just deleted an article with similar problems, but with the key difference that it was clearly intended to promote a company. I'll post the deleted text here shortly. It's up to you whether you still feel that you want to work on it, but please copy it to your hard drive in any case, since I'll redelete if you don't want to use it in the near future. My apologies for being unduly uncharitable, since your intentions were not in bad faith.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've made these edits, formatting, added a couple of links, removed address (non-encylopaedic). I've changed the "References" to "Further reading" since I can't see how they are being used as refs, and I removed one which already appears in the reflist.


 * I think you really need to make notability clearer. I've no idea of how many individual and organisational members there are, what it's funding is (sources and amount). You also need at least one more reference. At present, the whole of the first paragraph is unsourced, and your two refs are to the organisation itself and to someone who appears to be associated. Something sourced to the national parks service or the historic sites organisation would be good. It's up to you when you move this back to article space (you should see a "move" tab somewhere) but I'd suggest these additions to make it a bit more fireproof  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:05, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks OK to me. The financial stuff isn't critical, I was just trying to get a bit more meat in the article, in case there were any queries about notability from other editors, but I think you should move it to article space now, good luck  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd rather assumed that you would move straight to article space rather than go back to AfC, since I've effectively already reviewed the article. It's up to you, but if you do decide to move it again, untick the "leave a redirect" box when you do, so it's cleared at AfC. Obviously there is nothing to stop any editor amending or commenting on the article at any time  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  09:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Now at National Collaborative for Women's History Sites, removed from AfC, let me know if any problems  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Dublin Seminar for New England Folklife - ISBN error
Hello. I've been working to fix invalid ISBNs in articles, which led me to [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dublin_Seminar_for_New_England_Folklife&oldid=620605278 this article] and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dublin_Seminar_for_New_England_Folklife&diff=prev&oldid=598576125 this edit]. The cite for Puritan Gravestone Art shows an error. This is because you have put a different kind of identifier (an OCLC control number) in the ISBN field. This OCLC control number links to the online copy of this item but I've noticed that you've also included a different OCLC control number in the url that links to the print copy of this item, so to fix this properly I need to know which one you actually used. To be clear, I'd like to change this: to either this (if you referred to the print version): or this (if you referred to the online version): Do you recall which version of the reference you actually used?TuxLibNit (talk) 22:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Super--thanks so very much for this! I don't recall which version, but I think the print version would be better. Thanks!

Women's History Sites (U.S. National Park Service)
Please do wikilinks correctly. It is Ohio not Ohio. They even look different on the page... Ohio vs. Ohio.

Also, there should be no blank links between items in a list. Bgwhite (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of historic houses in Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strong House. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Applied history, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ernest May ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Applied_history check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Applied_history?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Peter Benes, from its old location at User:Mrmedit/Peter Benes. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Benes (July 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Benes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Benes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Peter_Benes Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chris_troutman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Peter_Benes reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Benes
Hello, Mrmedit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Benes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Benes


Hello, Mrmedit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Benes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)