User talk:Mrn NL

How to improve citations and references
Hello Could you kindly specify your query? Could you have a look? I improved the citations and references. Let me know what's to improve furthermore. Happy to learn!! Thanks much.Mrn NL (talk) 12:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC) Hi Could you have a look and help me out? Did I make the right improvements? Please help me out. I would be happy to have it set allright. Mrn NL (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pinging me. I looked at your article and it looks fine now. I am going to remove the template since the issues have been fixed. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks much for letting me know! Mrn NL (talk) 12:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Michiel Verboven moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Michiel Verboven, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Imme Rog moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Imme Rog, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Sigrid van Aken moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sigrid van Aken, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know! I just made improvements, following the Wikipedia guidelines. I wasn't aware a corporate website of a large company can't be use as source of factual information. I added many new public, reliable sources.
 * Could you have a look and let me know personally if it looks better? Mrn NL (talk) 18:58, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @GPL93 I wasn't aware the corporate website couldn't be a source of information. Thanks for your heads up, I just updated the complete article. Could you have a new look, please? Mrn NL (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mrn NL. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Novamedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know! I am just a Dutchman, not connected to the organisation, who was surprised a business women, managing an international company with a yearly turn-over of 2.5 billion dollars, didn't have her own Wikipedia page yet. Mrn NL (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You have only made edits related to Novamedia and several of them contain promotional language. You also have uploaded a photo as an own work from inside Novamedia's headquarters. Undisclosed paid editing can result in an indefinite block. Additionally, none of the executives have articles on Dutch Wikipedia. GPL93 (talk) 21:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michiel Verboven (March 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michiel Verboven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michiel Verboven, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Michiel_Verboven Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:HitroMilanese&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Michiel_Verboven reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 19:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Imme Rog (June 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Imme Rog and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Imme Rog, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Imme_Rog Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MurielMary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Imme_Rog reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sigrid van Aken has been accepted
 Sigrid van Aken, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sigrid_van_Aken help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! asilvering (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello Mrn NL. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mrn NL. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Michiel Verboven
Hello, Mrn NL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michiel Verboven, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Michiel Verboven


Hello, Mrn NL. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Michiel Verboven".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:22, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Imme Rog
Hello, Mrn NL. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Imme Rog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)