User talk:Mrnickles01

April 2017
Hello, I'm Mélencron. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Socialist Party (France) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mélencron (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Socialist Party (France), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 17:24, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Establishment Politics


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Establishment Politics. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Establishment. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Establishment. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Free E. (talk) 18:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

October, 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to H. L. Mencken, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  JGHowes   talk  00:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judy Sheindlin, you may be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   06:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)