User talk:Mro

If you leave a message here, please raise my attention on frwiki, thanks.

Request to move article Le Cœur a ses raisons incomplete
You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Le Cœur a ses raisons to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:


 * 1) Added    at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article.  This creates the required template for you there.
 * 2) Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding  NewName  to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
 * 3) Added  PageName  to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 00:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Brussels naming conventions
It seems we've almost reached a consensus at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Belgium/Brussels_naming_conventions. Please comment on the proposal for double names and in the poll on which name should be first in the lead and infobox when there is no English name. Cheers,  Oreo Priest  talk 19:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

À double entente
Au sujet de ceci : le TLFI connaît à double entente :

À double entente. (Syntagme défini) Qui peut donner lieu à deux interprétations. (Quasi-)synon. ambigu. "J'ai pendant la dernière heure une conversation à double entente avec Adèle et Mme Rebuffet" (STENDHAL, Journal, 1802, p. 49) :

" ... il régnait entre les neveux et l'oncle, une complicité, des plaisanteries occultes, des mots à double entente, tout un mystère où elle n'entrait pas". MAURIAC, Le Mystère Frontenac, 1933, p. 111.

Mro (talk) 20:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Effectivement, j'avais partiellement tort : merci pour la référence.
 * Cependant, le terme "une double entente" n'existe pas, c'est seulement l'expression "à double entente" qui existe - contrairement au terme "double sens", qui lui est utilisé principalement dans sa forme substantivée. Une "double entente" n'est donc effectivement pas une traduction valable pour double entendre - ce que prétendait l'article. --BTCK (talk) 13:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)