User talk:Mrp346

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sherwood College has been reverted. Your edit here to Sherwood College was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sherwood College. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Bgwhite (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * this is not disruptive editing, i am an alumni of this institution, and have posted links on the notable people.if there is another uninformed editor i would like to know. this is the only page i am editing.as i see you have only recently started editing, and are not qualified to edit domain specific pages.
 * I've been editing for 10 years. I'm #16 on the list of editors with the most edits.  You have 17 edits, with alot of them reverts.  I think I know the rules more than you do.  I've given you the rules page where it states notable people needs to have an article.  I've stated how you are doing lists wrong.  You are disruptive editing by reverting all the time.  FOLLOW THE RULES!  Bgwhite (talk) 20:10, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * As you have removed my previous message, the rule can be found at WP:LISTPEOPLE.  Remember, anybody can edit any page.  Never tell somebody they can't edit a page.  Bgwhite (talk) 20:16, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

rather patronising approach, anyways,"anybody can edit a page" you have been threatening me with removal.no need to shout as i have been polite throughout our interaction.this page does not require your "editing" skills reason being some of the alumnai like Amitabh Bachan,Kabir Bedi are well known names in many parts of the world & the list is India specific in terms of a large number of our notable people,and their wikipedia pages also mention their where they went to school.rather than a wholesale "i know better" approach, i would suggest and hope, you adopt lot more nuanced about your disruptive editing.

May 2016
Hello, I'm Jc86035. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sherwood College has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If you want to add sources, put the links in  tags at the end of the line (or words) you want to source; then they'll show up in the references list. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use &#123;&#123;re&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 10:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

hello, i am an alumnai of this institution and a member of the Old Sherwoodian Society executive committee, i have listed the sources, media cuttings wikipedia etc on our prominent alumnai.this is th eonly page i edit and watch.the alumnai are all India centric in prominence except for Amitabh Bachchan,FM Manekshaw, business etc etc.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * User:Mrp346/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Mrp346 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Mrp346 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sherwood College. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Bgwhite (talk) 04:44, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * You have been warned multiple times and reverted by multiple editors over your addition of non-notable people. Per WP:LISTPEOPLE, a person added to the list has to meet nobility requirements and have references.  Generally, this means a person already needs an article.  Any further disruption by you will result in a block.  Yes, anybody can edit as long as they follow the rules, which you are not.  Bgwhite (talk) 04:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


 * once again there is no disruption, i have added refrences from Wikipedia pages of the notable people,check those before deleting wholesale.because you are alos in violation fo the guidelines.


 * Again, here is the guideline... Per WP:LISTPEOPLE there must be references and generally an article. Here's the diff of your edit and there is not one reference next to any name that you added.   Multiple people have reverted you.  It is up to you, not use to provide the right information.  You can lie all you want.  You must follow the rules.  Bgwhite (talk) 05:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

"LIE" are you stable mentally?,talk about yourselg not multiple people is not your concern,one of them is helping me hence the refrence i put ,you are being extremely aggressive for no reason, and this is cyber bullying,you are also not aware fully of the rules you so cherish and self righteously slavishly quote.i have used wikipedia pages as sources https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Introduction_to_referencing_with_Wiki_Markup/1 it is always better to educate,explain and encourage properly,your show of aggressive self righteousness is unwarranted and absolutely not in keeping with the spirit of wikipedia.I woould suggest you leave this page for me to discuss with the editors i am in touch with and are teaching me.

July 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sherwood College. - Arjayay (talk) 11:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

How many times do you have to be told to STOP adding names without Wikipedia articles to the Notable alumni section of Sherwood College - Arjayay (talk) 11:47, 16 July 2016 (UTC)