User talk:Mrpainkiller7

Positive
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. --Allen3 talk 03:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Negative
Mrpainkiller, Neurophyte and Jean-Philippe

After a complaint at intervention against vandalism, I protected the article VampireFreaks.com. It was either that, or block all of you for disruption and personal attacks. I will unprotect the article in the morning. In the meantime, please consider the following:
 * Reverting another user's talk page is pretty rude. There is a policy conflict between the user talk page policy, which says users can blank or archive warnings (although archiving is preferred by the community) and the vandalism policy, which says that removing warnings given to you is vandalism.  I don't agree with the vandalism point of view, and I haven't seen a lot of support for it lately except among people who are fighting amongst themselves for other reasons.  If someone deletes a warning they've obviously seen it.  If you are concerned about someone's edits, use a verbose edit summary so that even if the warning is removed the edit summary will be visible.
 * I understand there is a view among two of you that Mrpainkiller7's edits are detrimental to the article. There are lots of right ways to deal with this, including editing by consensus, Request for comment on the article or the user, Mediation, and third opinion.  I'm not going to judge the content, but fighting (wherever it occurs) is the wrong way to deal with the problem.
 * Personal attacks are not to be tolerated. Please deal with the content of edits, not character.

I'm leaving this message with each of you. If you keep fighting over talk pages, I suppose I or another admin will eventually figure it's time to block someone. Unless you are positive that you are 100% right and the other guy is 100% wrong, you should probably try and work this out peacefully in case the admins don't see things your way. Thatcher131 23:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Miscellaneous
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jean-Philippe 17:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Jean-Philippe 18:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. L0b0t 18:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the 'enemies' section from your page per Attack page. If you continue to misuse your userpage for such activities you may be banned from the project. Also, such actions are completly inappopriate and carry the same penalty.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Blocked 1 week
You have been blocked for 1 week for incivility and vandalism. Durov a Charge! 23:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Mrpainkiller7 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Neurophyre(talk) 04:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User Phyrexian
A tag has been placed on Template:User Phyrexian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)