User talk:MrsCaffrey

October 2017
Hello, I'm Govvy. An edit that you recently made to Matt Bomer seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Govvy (talk) 14:55, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hugo Johnstone-Burt, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk  23:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Your statement "I will keep putting it back" at Dylan Minnette suggests that you're planning to edit-war. Please don't. It's one of the least effective ways to get changes made, and one of the quickest ways to get blocked. If someone disagrees with one of your edits, please open a discussion on the article's talk page instead.

Also, biograpies of living people must adhere to extremely strict standards, particularly regarding any sort of personal information. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 19:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Troian Bellisario, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  18:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Lili Reinhart. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  General Ization Talk  18:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Camila Mendes.  General Ization Talk  18:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

I have blocked you from editing Wikipedia for 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced content into biographical articles. I notice that this is longstanding problem with your editing. If you do not support your contributions with reliable references, this is likely to be considered disruption and result in further longer blocks. WJBscribe (talk) 20:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Derrick Rose. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 08:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * , you may have an interest in this block also. MrsCaffrey, I was considering blocking you indefinitely, and that may still happen. Drmies (talk) 02:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * MrsCaffrey, if you wish to continue contributing to Wikipedia it is extremely important that you address the issues that have been raised with your editing. Adding information without reference to a reliable source breaches our editing policies. This is particularly serious where the information relates to the personal lives of living people. I am afraid that if you are unable to edit in accordance with Wikipedia's rules, the 2 week block imposed by is likely to become a permanent one. WJBscribe (talk) 12:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)