User talk:Mrsleep99

Speedy deletion of Grow buddy
A tag has been placed on Grow buddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andyreply 16:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Coeliac disease
Just dropping a line to inform you why I removed mention of Vegiacs on coeliac disease. I think it is relevant to state that coeliacs who choose to be vegetarians run a risk of dietary deficiencies, but this requires a reliable source (e.g. a dietetics journal). Please see WP:MEDMOS for some general guidelines on what kind of websites to link through in medical articles. JFW | T@lk  05:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure why you have readded the content about vegetarians and coeliac. The reference you added was from a low-impact journal that is not indexed on PubMed. PubMed itself gives no results on research into vegetarianism and coeliac disease. I have the feeling we need to discuss this further on Talk:Coeliac disease. JFW | T@lk  06:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Vegiac
A tag has been placed on Vegiac requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — The Final Chronicler (talk) 01:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

File:Vegiac Logo.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vegiac Logo.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:28, 24 November 2011 (UTC)