User talk:Mrspak1602

1Stop
A tag has been placed on 1Stop, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of 1Stop and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 02:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please note under "Talk" on this particular page, the history of this article. It is at least the second, if not third, time this week someone has attempted to create this article. Suggest intervention by an admin, if needed. A little mollusk (talk) 02:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment
Happy to have your concern but I am not attempting to promote anything that I just want to share some view and collection of studies with others. To be honest, I am not familiar with the function and editing tactic of wikipedia, I am trying to improve and add more reference. Please let chance for starter to start and have a more willing to share as well as peaceful world.
 * You're welcome. I think by now, there have been several opinions made public by the Wikipedia community regarding this topic. Articles on this topic have been deleted previously. This week even! I understand that you -- and obviously others -- have some sort of vested interest in promoting the topic. The articles that have been submitted, even this one, do come across as advertorial rather than neutral. As I stated clearly to the last contributor, get neutral, third-party references and make the writing more neutral if you wish to prevent this material from being deleted. Thank you. A little mollusk (talk) 02:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles are neutral
Regarding your comment:
 * To be more honest, part of our final year project is to share one's view through online platform.

That may be tricky to accomplish through Wikipedia. First, Wikipedia articles require a neutral point of view. The author's views and opinions should not be able to be determined through the writing. Second, Wikipedia articles are collaborative, so the instructor would have to review not only the final version of the article, but also every intervening edit to determine which contributions are yours and which are other people's. —C.Fred (talk) 03:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)