User talk:Mrtrey99

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).
 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Follow the Simplified Ruleset
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Hi, I've made some minor changes to Peter G. Peterson, and I thought I'd let you know so that you can see the Wikipedia style, with bolded subject. Remember to give the nationality - we are not all Americans! jimfbleak 05:43, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You just deleted half the article I was working on
You just deleted almost all my work. They wern't unused catagories, they were about to be filed in!. I was just making Tahoe a great article. Tobyk777 20:00, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Never mind that, I just figured out how to revert the changes. Tobyk777 02:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Chiltepin_mexico_sonora.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chiltepin_mexico_sonora.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Attempts to erase Vidor, Texas past
Why do you keep removing any part of Vidor's article that reveals its past as a sundown town? 75.25.29.160 16:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Read the policy
Please read Verifiability before re-inserting unsourced material again, as you did for Red drum. In particular, see the section Verifiability. Once material has been challenged and removed for having no sources, it should not be added back into the article again until published reliable sources are cited. -- Donald Albury 23:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Mrtrey99! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Sandra Lerner -
 * 2) Nicolae Manolescu -

Exothermic cutting
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Exothermic cutting, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.oxylance.com/product_catalog/exothermic_cutting_systems.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Your addition to Exothermic cutting has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Starr Companies
Hello Mrtrey99,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Starr Companies for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Ish dar  ian  15:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Collins Stewart Hawkpoint for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Collins Stewart Hawkpoint is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Collins Stewart Hawkpoint until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Vachellia farnesiana var. farnesiana
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Vachellia farnesiana var. farnesiana&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 86.83.56.115 (talk) 10:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rabbit Inc.


The article Rabbit Inc. has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Per WP:N and WP:NCORP. No significant third-party coverage of a non-noteable company."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro (talk) 17:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

I guess much research was done before deleting this article.

https://www.fastcompany.com/3034555/rabbit-a-free-video-chat-that-makes-it-easy-to-watch-netflix-with-friends

https://www.businessinsider.com/this-startup-thinks-that-its-solved-a-major-problem-with-video-chatting-2014-8

https://techcrunch.com/2013/02/28/rabbit-raises-3-3m-seed-round/

https://decider.com/2017/06/28/skype-facetime-rabbit-the-best-way-to-remotely-binge/

https://www.techspot.com/article/1224-watch-netflix-with-friends/

https://mashable.com/article/netflix-sync/#3BBRRDmG1gqZ

Speedy deletion nomination of Rabbit Inc.


A tag has been placed on Rabbit Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Largoplazo (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

I am really glad you deleted this, it really makes me want to contribute to Wikipedia when people delete articles. I guess Wikipedia needs the storage space.

Ibrahim ben Ali
The work you just did on Ibrahim ben Ali recreated an article that had previously been deleted for lack of notability. As the article now stands, it is no more persuasive than the older form of the article, only citing a dead self-published special-interest web page, and I was thinking about nominating it for deletion again, given that pretty much all of the coverage of this man seemed to be as an aside while talking about his grandson, meaning he was not independently notable. . . . then I found a couple of detailed sources on him alone - you will want to incorporate these:,. You should also dump the bare URL at the bottom of the page - that is not how Wikipedia handles references. Try to find formally-published material that recapitulates the information, so you can avoid the web page entirely, which debatably isn't WP:RS, but if you must, use a live version of the page, and cite it properly - author, title, publisher, and URL (use the cite web template). Agricolae (talk) 05:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ibrahim Ben Ali


The article Ibrahim Ben Ali has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unsourced"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MDPMHG (talk) 07:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of White Mountains Insurance Group


The article White Mountains Insurance Group has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCORP."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jacona (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of White Mountains Insurance Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Mountains Insurance Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/White Mountains Insurance Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jacona (talk) 04:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ibrahim Ben Ali
Hello, Mrtrey99,

Thank you for creating Ibrahim Ben Ali.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"The Dublin Literary Journal and Select Family Visitor has extensive coverage of the subject, but as an obscure 19th century publication it's not clear whether or not this source is reliable."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 21:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mann+Hummel


A tag has been placed on Mann+Hummel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Gorat's for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gorat's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gorat's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)