User talk:Mrtrump

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Onorem♠Dil 18:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Second city of the United Kingdom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Second city of the United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Gscshoyru (talk) 16:03, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sathya Sai Baba, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lihaas (talk) 22:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Second city of the united kingdom
I edit this article continuously to improve it, I reference my material well and present facts. It is common knowledge that Leeds is considered as a possible second city location, so why do you keep deleting my edits? Furthermore, a while back there was another instance of "vandalism" on this page in which extreme and unfounded bias was seen towards Glasgow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrtrump (talk • contribs) 11:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The only edits of yours on that page that I have reverted are this one where you remove half of the content of the page, and this one where you blank the entire page. I haven't been able to find a diff of an edit you made to that page that did anything other than remove a large amount of content -- so I don't know what you mean when you say you reference your material well -- but I may have missed something, so if I'm wrong, please show me a diff where you did something else.
 * If you think the content of the page is incorrect and biased, it is ok to remove it, or even better change it to be more accurate and WP:NPOV -- but only once -- see WP:BRD. If your edit is reverted, which is already has been, you should try to discuss on the talk page of the wiki article, and only change it again once consensus has been reached. In the future, I would also suggest an edit summary so people know why you're removing the content, otherwise they may simply assume, as I and everyone else who reverted your edits did, that it was vandalism. Ok? Gscshoyru (talk) 12:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Leeds. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. I have started a section at Talk:Leeds to discuss this issue of nicknames. Please discuss, rather than edit war. Polequant (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User:Elland1, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:40, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. When you recently edited Leeds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 5 April 2012 (UTC)