User talk:Mrunal Dhoble

Edits to the article Dhoble
Hi Mrunal Dhoble, I have reverted your recent edits to the article Dhoble, the reasons being the following. Kindly take time to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies. If you have any further queries, feel free to drop by at the Teahouse or leave a comment on my talk page. Thanks, MT TrainDiscuss 17:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Please understand that user-generated content are avoided from being used as a reference. These includes blogs, Youtube videos, IMDb, and Wikipedia itself, which is considered an unreliable source.
 * Further, common terms and words easily understandable by the common person should not be linked. These include 96 and royal as you had done, which was corrected by another editor later. Also keep in mind that several articles might have the same title. Taking an example of your article, linking Hometown as Hometown will lead you to a disambiguation page like this. In such cases, you should proceed by linking the exact name of the article like Hometown (film) or alternatively use a piped link to make it Hometown.
 * Going forward, the boldface is most often limited to just the introductory line, any other words in the article that need to be emphasized should be Italicized, which again should not be overdone.

My Edit
Dear Sir, I respect your thinking and changes made, but i feel tht the data entered by me was accurate to my knowledge and i see no requirement of changes in it, and myself being a part of the Maharashtrian Dhoble family, i knw better about our family background and history, and those references are not to publish or promote any website or page.

The reason behind linking those details is, as many of belongings to the "Dhoble" family have migrated to various parts of india and even outside at the long reaches of our planet Earth, i an looking forward to keep a record at this page with the correct information about our family details and background which if unknown by an individual can search the web and make Wikipedia a proud place to know his originality.

I am, reverting the page to my last edit, i regret for not accepting the current edit but i know the edit i am, reverting is best to my knowledge.

Thank you, Mrunal Dhoble. Mrunal Dhoble (talk) 16:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC
 * I'm not sure if you're familiar with Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Another editor has removed the numerous bolded words and overlinking, and I'm restoring it back as per what WP:MOS requires. If not me, another editor will. Any more reverts to the previous version might lead to the arbitration committee stepping in. Thanks, MT TrainDiscuss 18:34, 26 December 2017 (UTC)