User talk:Mrweb2010

)


 * "Official" how? As far as I can see there are already links to what appears to be an official tourism site, and the one you're linking to doesn't seem to claim it's official from a quick skim. If you're at all unsure of why we're so paranoid about this sort of thing: you say you've been a long time reader of Wikipedia, but about how useful do you think the site would be if we allowed our content to be dictated by the whim of every commercial interest that happened to wander by? They certainly do try, but if we didn't do a very persistent job keeping them out I'd daresay the encyclopedia wouldn't be nearly as useful or successful as it is, today. That's not to say that I think your site is unimportant or anything else of the sort; that's not really relevant, per our guidelines on external linking. – Luna Santin  (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * So it is officially a website? That's not quite the same as being an official website, I'm afraid. What organization with standing to do so has endorsed this website, and in what capacity? – Luna Santin  (talk) 13:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * As you've now admitted the site is not an "official information portal" as you described above, your earlier claims seem somewhat disingenuous. I'm sorry you're offended, but please bear in mind the issues I brought up above: Wikipedia is not a directory, and attempts to turn us into one detract from the usefulness of the site. In the meantime, you've given every indication that your sole purpose in editing is to add links to this site, which we're probably not going to unblock you to do. Is there anything else you're interested in editing? – Luna Santin  (talk) 14:05, 11 March 2010 (UTC)