User talk:MsLeeuwenhart

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi MsLeeuwenhart! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:20, Saturday, November 4, 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, MsLeeuwenhart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Paleo Neonate  – 13:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Satanic ritual abuse and Skeptoid
Hello. I noticed that you copied the article in your sandbox, which is fine temporarily. I however recommend trying to edit the main article itself too. I wanted to let you know that there is a special template for Skeptoid citations, Skeptoid. In case you did not already know, we also have a semi-active Wikiproject, WP:SKEPTIC which might possibly interest you. Another related resource is WP:FTN, the fringe theories noticeboard, useful for more centralized discussion when the article talk pages are not enough. Happy editing, — Paleo Neonate  – 13:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the prompt actionUser:PaleoNeonate! It's clear to me that this page is under strict supervision, and with good reason. I'm too new and too shy to edit a live page, so I figured I make my first stupid mistakes in my sandbox. I'm grateful for the skeptoid ref instructions, I'll look into them and practice again. In my sandbox. Tbh a reason to include a ref to the podcast is the fact that Blake Smith makes a point of outlining the interests of the era, with lots of popmusic and movies hinting at the occult or satanic topics. He also refers to an important source, The Satan Seller by Warnke, which is as yet unmentioned on the page, but I'd have to look for a direct reference to link to. At the same time I wanted to make an unobtrusive noob edit and I was thinking of making a suggestion on the talk page first. Oh and I'll definitely check out your skeptic pages suggestions, thanks again! Do correct me when I stumble, I appreciate it! MsLeeuwenhart (talk) 15:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Skeptoid is notable and appears to be considered a reliable enough source to be cited more than a hundred times in the encyclopedia. If others question your choice, it's possible to assess the source's suitability for specific instances by asking at WP:RSN.  The article is about a sensitive topic, you're probably right that it's on multiple watchlists.  The approach you mentioned to start a discussion on its talk page is great, it's of course important to not just discuss about the topic but for it to be about article improvements (WP:NOTFORUM).  We have an often cited WP:BOLD which encourages to edit, the important is to be responsive when others contest our changes (related reading: WP:BRD, WP:CONSENSUS).  With these in mind editing should hopefully go smoothly.  I will not be personally or particularly monitoring your edits but feel free to ping me if you think I could be of help (which can be done using  at the beginning of a message while ending the same message with four tildes in the same edit).  Happy editing, — Paleo  Neonate  – 19:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)