User talk:MsNika349/sandbox

Ant N York (talk) 21:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

108.41.250.159 (talk) 19:27, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Wikipedia User:Cgchapman

Date of review: 04/28/2013 Name of editor: Wkipedia User: MsNika349
 * Replace with username for version on talk page**

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 04/28/2013 Date review submitted to instructor Length of edit (too long/too short): Image (needed/appropriate): Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Wikiformatting: Grammar & composition: Other comments:
 * Replace with username for version on talk page**
 * The edit has a good length
 * It might be possible to find an appropriate image but its not really needed.
 * Information is accurate
 * N/A
 * Information was accurate and it realets to I/O psychology
 * wikiformatting was okay
 * Grammer and composition was good.
 * None

Cgchapman (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Keronica Grant


 * Replace with username for version on talk page**:MsNika349

Date of review: 5/2/13 Name of editor:MsNika349

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:4/30/13

Date review submitted to instructor:

Length of edit (too long/too short): perfect length

Image (needed/appropriate): none

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: none

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): yes Wikiformatting: good formatting Grammar & composition: no grammatical error

Other comments: great topic!

--Keronica Grant (talk) 19:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Neffaterie Thomas

Replace with username for version on talk page**:MsNika349 Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor:MsNika349

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:4/30/13

Date review submitted to instructor:

Length of edit (too long/too short): very good length not to much to read

Image (needed/appropriate): none

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): correct

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: none

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): yes

Wikiformatting: well done

Grammar & composition: no grammatical error

Other comments:

neffateriet (talk)

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page**	Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review-	5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**	MsNika349

URL of editor’s Userpage-	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MsNika349/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page-	5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor-	5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)-	Good length

Image (needed/appropriate)-	n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)-	Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed-	n/a

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-	Yes

Wikiformatting-	Good

Grammar & composition-	Good

Other comments-	none

DJames5 (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Nae0408 (talk) 02:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre edit peer review
{| class="wikitable"

! Name of student reviewer !! Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey Joan Bailey (talk) 18:42, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Date of review || 5/15/2013
 * Name of editor|| Wikipedia User: MsNika349
 * URL of editor’s Userpage ||http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MsNika349
 * Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page || 05/15/13
 * Date review submitted to instructor || 05/15/13
 * Length of edit (too long/too short) ||The length of the edit is Good.
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || N/A
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook information is accurately edited.
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || The information presented relates to I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Edits are okay!
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || N/A
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || Textbook information is accurately edited.
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed || N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || The information presented relates to I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Edits are okay!
 * Wikiformatting || Formatting is good.
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Edits are okay!
 * Grammar & composition || Grammar and composition is good.
 * Other comments|| Edits are okay!
 * Other comments|| Edits are okay!

Pre edit peer review
{| class="wikitable"

! Name of student reviewer !! Mtrowers
 * Date of review || 5/14/2013
 * Name of editor|| Wikipedia User:MsNika349
 * URL of editor’s Userpage ||http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nika349
 * Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page || 05/14/13
 * Date review submitted to instructor || 05/14/13
 * Length of edit (too long/too short) || good length
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || n/a
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || symmetrical
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed ||N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Accurate for I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Ok
 * Grammar & composition || Good grammar
 * Other comments|| Good job
 * Image (needed/appropriate) || n/a
 * Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) || symmetrical
 * Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed ||N/A
 * Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) || Accurate for I/O Psych
 * Wikiformatting || Ok
 * Grammar & composition || Good grammar
 * Other comments|| Good job
 * Wikiformatting || Ok
 * Grammar & composition || Good grammar
 * Other comments|| Good job
 * Grammar & composition || Good grammar
 * Other comments|| Good job
 * Other comments|| Good job