User talk:Msagallery

File permission problem with File:Dennis Smith Profile Picture.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dennis Smith Profile Picture.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 17:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dennis Smith Airship with Girl Pilot.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dennis Smith Airship with Girl Pilot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Dennis Smith (sculptor)
In reply to your post on Talk:Dennis Smith (sculptor)

"Ok Kylietastic I understand the COI. The issue before us is that I need help navigating the inaccurate portions in the article while also maintaining wikipedia etiquette. I also am attempting to edit the article and add some enlightening and publicly beneficial information about Dennis Smith and his work. You're changing the article because of technicalities? Please Help a novice like myself fix the smaller issues instead of reverting back.  I'm having a hard time understanding your motivation and how your revert helps people find information about Dennis Smith.  I appreciate any help you can lend."


 * No we are not "changing the article because of technicalities?", you have been reverted by several editors for several important issues:
 * Copyright violations are not technicalities they are legal issues. When you edit read the line above the edit section "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted".
 * Unsourced material is also not a technicality, but a key principle of Wikipedia and is also in the statement when editing Encyclopedic content must be verifiable.
 * Unsourced material for biographies of living people is also taken very seriously and is not a technicality - see Biographies of living persons
 * Removal of sourced information without reason is also considered disruptive. You appear to have a link to the subject and your complete rewrite looks like a Ownership of content issue
 * You say "I'm having a hard time understanding your motivation and how your revert helps people find information about Dennis Smith" - we are motivated by the policies stated in the revert edit summaries and in the comments on the talk page. Fundamentally by that key principle you're reminded of when editing "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable". However I, like most of the regular editors, also want articles to be added and improved the same as yourself - however people need to be able to trust what they find on Wikipedia that's why we do not just take peoples word on things, especially for BLP's.


 * So far your attempts have been taken as good faith which is another important policy we have, however editors who make no attempt to address any of the issues they are made aware of will be warned and blocked.


 * How to proceed:
 * Firstly do not revert again, your edit has far too many issues (copyright violation; removal of references; completely unsourced additions; removal of valid categories; invalid image links). You can either make edits again directly to the article (not copyrighted and sourced) or work on a new version in your sandbox (User:Msagallery/sandbox) and then seek advise on it.
 * You say there are "inaccurate portions" - if this is so they should be removed if not sourced - sourced information needs a counter source or valid claim of no being reliable before being removed.
 * You then say your trying to "add some enlightening and publicly beneficial information" - great - but it must be sourced, and not copyrighted (unless also freely licensed)
 * If you want help, advise etc from friendly experienced editors and admins I suggest the Wikipedia:Teahouse
 * or you could ask projects interested in the topic to help - like: WikiProject Biography or WikiProject Visual arts
 * Sorry but its not a topic I'm particularly interested in knowledgeable about, so without sources to work from I can't directly help. I've looked at your changes as I normally like to recover valid parts, but again as it's all unsourced there is nothing to work with. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2016 (UTC)