User talk:Msanders08

Science Feedback
On Science Feedback you have inserted "propaganda". I see from the edit history that you have done this repeatedly, despite being reverted. Have you read WP:EW? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 15:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

This is because the site is a left wing Marxist propaganda site censoring health professionals from informing the public. It is beyond their expertise to censor credible medical information from peer reviewed studies that are actually published on JAMA, The Lancet and NCBI. Wikipedia should not allow political propaganda from sites such as this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msanders08 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm SoyokoAnis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Science Feedback, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    SoyokoAnis  -  talk  18:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

You mean just like you provide references? I can do all this day long. You know that you are a propaganda site. Everyone knows it. The silent majority has been awaken. Time for the people to reclaim information and how it is treated. You censored peer reviewed studies that demonstrated that children who have been confined and masked are getting sick and that masks and confinement is the problem. In Canada's largest francophone pediatric hospital, we had zero pediatric cases n the PICU due to COVID-19. Zero. And yet we now have a crisis where our PICU is filled with young children with RSV and CMV infections like we have never seen before. In an open letter to our prime minister our physicians voiced their concern that children are not developing their immune systems as they should be and that we see an alarming rise in infections that did not affect as many children in the past. ICU RN and ECMO specialist for over 30 years here and original member of the pediatric SARS tactical task force team here. Stop censoring healthcare professionals and we will leave you alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msanders08 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please review WP:RGW, WP:BRD, and WP:EW. Possibly also WP:COI. -- VViking Talk Edits 19:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Msanders08


A tag has been placed on User:Msanders08 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking Talk Edits 19:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Controversial topic area alerts
—  Newslinger  talk   05:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

—  Newslinger  talk   05:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

—  Newslinger  talk   05:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Draft:Science Feedback. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —  Newslinger  talk   05:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Science Feedback. —  Newslinger  talk   05:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. signed, Willondon (talk) 05:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)