User talk:Msavani07

Obelisk of Montecitorio
Hey Msavani07, welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed your contributions to Obelisk of Montecitorio last week. You added a number of things to the article, and also added two references at the bottom. Thank you very much for that.

I converted the plain link references you gave to the appropriate cite-templates (Citation templates). However, without reading these papers in full, I can not make out the way in which your references support what you added to the article. Could I perhaps ask you to look at Citation templates and learn about the ' ' way of referencing your text inline? These create the convenient footnotes that Wikipedia uses, and make clear which part of text is supported by which source. If you need any help or further explanation, feel free to contact me at my talk page or visit the Teahouse and ask there. Thanks again, and hope you have a good stay at Wikipedia.--91.64.37.35 (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, its me again. I removed two lines you added. You gave a partial translation of line 5, 6 and 7 of the roman inscription without noticing that the whole inscription was already translated below. May I please ask you to carefully read the article before editing so to avoid duplicate information? Something like this is bound to confuse readers of wikipedia. Thanks a lot, all the best--91.64.37.35 (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * And me again. I removed a further paragraph from your edit, the bit about the benben stone. For once, you seem to have confused a thing or two here. The Benben was a mythological mound or small mountain, after which the top of the pyramid and the top of the Obelisk (the Pyramidion) were modeled. You write "The obelisks were monuments that had a similar shape to the ben-ben stone.", which is incorrect. Only the Pyramidion, the top bit, has a similar shape. Additionally, the correct form of the information you give would perhaps be appropriate for the general Obelisk article (but this already contains that information), it is not relevant to the specific Obelisk of Montecitorio. I hope this is not a disappointment, we always love to have editors who know the value of citing sources. Again, if you need any help or have further questions, feel free to visit the Teahouse or ask me. Have a great day.--91.64.37.35 (talk) 20:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)