User talk:Msginsberg

Source Vagabond Systems
Hello, following a request made at User talk:Nick-D on your behalf, I've posted the content of the deleted Source Vagabond Systems article at User:Msginsberg so it can be worked on. I deleted this article as it violated criterion 11 of Wikipedia's Criteria for speedy deletion as it reads like an advertisement for this company. To be suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, the article needs to meet the notability criteria set out at WP:CORP - this basically boils down to being supported by references to reliable sources which are independent of this company and cover it in a significant level of detail (note that these references need to be about the company, and not its products in order for its notability to be established, so reviews of individual products aren't useful in this regards). If these criteria can be met, the article should provide a neutral account of this company's history and products. Topics such as the warranty period for products, in-house competitions and charitable activities are pretty irrelevant, unless they have also been identified as important by external reliable sources. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 08:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Illesteva for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Illesteva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Illesteva until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)