User talk:Mshea

Hi! I've moved your personal info to your brand-new talk page. "Michael E. Shea" was up for deletion as a vanity article. Welcome!! - Lucky 6.9 22:58, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:BobShea.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BobShea.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 06:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

The Illuminatus! Trilogy
If you're still around, maybe you'd like to take a look at the Illuminatus article, we'd like to hear your thoughts. Шизомби 05:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

The Playboy Advisor
It would be interesting to know more about your father's work at Playboy. Don't know if you ever looked up the article in Playboy mentioned in Illuminatus, the "Playboy Advisor" in the April 1969 issue pages 62 and 64. I'm supposing your father wrote it, and Wilson wrote the reply. Here's the letter, I'll post the reply later:
 * I recently heard an old man of right-wing views—a friend of my grandparents’—assert that the current wave of assassinations in America is the work of a secret society called the Illuminati. He said that the Illuminati have existed throughout history, own the international banking cartels, have all been 32nd-degree Masons and were known to Ian Fleming, who portrayed them as SPECTRE in his James Bond books—for which the Illuminati did away with Mr. Fleming.  At first, this all seemed like a paranoid delusion to me.  Then I read in The New Yorker that Allan Chapman, one of Jim Garrison's investigators in the New Orleans probe of the John Kennedy assassination, believes that the Illuminati really exist.  The next step in my galloping descent into credulity occurred when I mentioned this subject to a friend who is majoring in Middle Eastern affairs.  He told me that the Illuminati were actually of Arabic origin and that their founder was the legendary “old man of the mountains,” who used marijuana to work up a murderous frenzy and who fought against both the Crusaders and the orthodox Moslems, adding that their present ruler is the Aga Khan; but, he said, it is now merely a harmless religious order known as Ismailianism.
 * I then began to wonder seriously about all this. I mentioned it to a friend from Berkeley.  He immediately told me that there is a group on campus that calls itself the Illuminati and boasts that it secretly controls international finance and the mass media.  Now (if PLAYBOY isn’t part of the Illuminati conspiracy), can you tell me: Are the Illuminati part of the Masons?  Is Aga Khan their leader?  Do they really control all the banks and TV stations?  And who have they killed lately?—R.S., Kansas City, Missouri.

They were working on the book at the time, so it makes sense that they would print a letter and reply in Playboy that they could then use in their book, even if it is a bit mischievous! Regards, Шизомби 04:24, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Mikeshea.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mikeshea.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 02:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bobshea.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bobshea.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ptr ru 18:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)