User talk:Mshoaib271

WP:Citation overkill
Hello, Mshoaib271. I reverted you here and here at the Brangelina article because, like I stated in those edits, those references are unneeded WP:Citation overkill. Another reason that I reverted you, as stated in that first revert, is because of the addition of poor sources; see WP:BLPSOURCES. This latest edit to that article by you is also unneeded WP:Citation overkill. And, if you notice, you were partially reverted here at the Elton John article by Carlos Rojas77 because of WP:Citation overkill. I know that you think that you are helping with these or other WP:Citation overkill edits you have made, but you are not. These are not cases where more than two or three references are needed. You also need to be mindful of the WP:Edit warring policy. Flyer22 (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

George Clooney
Thanks for adding cites but IMDB and other Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable. --Neil N  talk to me 14:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Links and references unreliable, promotional
Hello, I'm Ronz. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 20:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

See also WP:COI in case it might apply. --Ronz (talk) 20:26, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 16:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Sunny Leone
Once again, the sources you added are not reliable. If you want to continue editing Wikipedia, I suggest either learning what are proper sources while avoiding editing any biographical information.

Could you please respond? You are at risk of being blocked at this point. --Ronz (talk) 18:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding. As I said, just stay away from biographical information as you learn. To start, the Wikipedia guideline is WP:RELIABLE. You may find this manual section helpful as well. --Ronz (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Styletag


A tag has been placed on Styletag, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 08:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Styletag


A tag has been placed on Styletag, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 09:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Styletag, you may be blocked from editing. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 09:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

The speedy deletion tag came up by mistake, so I've been rectifying it. Could you please help me create my company's page Styletag?==Speedy deletion nomination of Styletag==

A tag has been placed on Styletag, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please help me remove this.(User talk:Mshoaib271)

Nomination of Murcyleen Peerzada for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murcyleen Peerzada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murcyleen Peerzada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  08:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)