User talk:Mskadu/Archive 11

Zaira Wasim
The section is titled "Controversies". That comes across to me as blaming Wasim. i.e. slut-shaming. Isn't there a more appropriate section heading name? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello there Jim1138, to me that word simply marks her involvement and not judgement. It seemed apt and I also saw it used elsewhere. But, any suggestions are most welcome 😉  -MayureshK

Article FUNTORO
Good day, Mskadu! I recently edit a article called FUNTORO After publishing the article I still can't find the page in search engines. Do you know what could be the possible reason of that? B3581475 (talk) 15:43, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Good day to you too, B3581475 :). I think that may be because of the 90-day rule as described here. -MayureshK
 * : Thanks for your answer Mskadu, but I am still a little confusing. Is it mean we have to wait 90 days to find it in the search engine? Or once the article is verified by the patrollers, it will be "Indexed"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by B3581475 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * It appears so, yes. -MayureshK
 * Or if the article is "patrolled", it' will also be "indexed"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by B3581475 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * As an example, one of my recently created articles was marked Reviewed the same day it was created (2nd Dec) and Google appears to have indexed it on the 13th. So it does appear that Reviewed or Patrolled articles do get picked up after they are marked so. Otherwise, they are indexed after 90 days. But this is just what I can deduce. -MayureshK 10:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Good day MayureshK! Really appreciate your help. I got only 2 more questions. How can we know the articles are reviewed or patrolled? And normally how long does it take? Thank you again for helping me and wish you a Merry Christmas! — Preceding unsigned comment added by B3581475 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * As the creator of the article you will get a notification when this is done (same as when someone thanks you). Sometimes, the patroller/ reviewer might leave a note on your talk page to let you know if there's feedback or just a plain "it's done". As for ETA, I understand there's a pretty long queue so I don't think there's a ETA. So patience is the only thing in your hands 😉. Thank you for your wishes and the same to you. -MayureshK 08:42, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The page was reviewed yesterday, will hold for further update. Thank you for your time & help :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by B3581475 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Fantastic, have fun 😉 -MayureshK 10:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Bajirao I
I just saw your message about my recent changes to the article Baji Rao I citing Wikipedia policy on living or recently deceased person. You and I both know he died some 278 years ago !

Regarding the addition of "Rao" separately to Marathi names - Doing so incorrectly shows that it was a separate part of the name instead a part of the title or name. It is not a distinct part of a name.

See the references below:

https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.57399 https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.32171?q=bajirao

In Marathi:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWfdZssVEAALLJg.jpg https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.263920

As such, the title for this specific page for Bajirao I and all other related Peshwa pages should change, such as Narayan Rao etc.

Infact Madhavrao I and Raghunathrao have mixture of "Rao" separate and combined. They should all be uniformly edited to the combined form — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkarja (talk • contribs) 01:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * - Makes sense to me. I have started this discussion on the articles talk page on the topic. Please feel free to add further comments there. If there are no objections, I will go ahead and make the change in the next few days, -MayureshK 10:58, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Raazi: Article Review
I recently came upon your article on the film "Raazi" and after reading through the plot, it could be greatly improved. You make it seem like a review rather than describing the actual story line, which is what people generally expect to find when reading through the plot of a movie.Fvtxmv (talk) 12:24, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * - I did not start that particular article :-) You are most welcome to improve it as you see fit -MayureshK 13:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


 * I haven't seen the film so I wouldn't be the right person to edit the article. You could make better changes to it. Sorry that I assumed you had initially written it.Fvtxmv (talk) 17:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 * - No worries. This is now done. Perhaps once you've had a chance to see the film you can give us a hand. -MayureshK 17:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Pu La Deshpande
Yes the changes made to Purushottam Laxman Deshpande Wikipedia page were correct. If you knew P. L. Deshpande and can read Marathi language, then read Gangot by P. L. Deshpande. He wrote an article on Dinesh, his nephew. Read the newspapers of June 12th 2000, the day PL passed away. All the newspapers talked about Dinesh Thakur as his "Manasputra". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.13.41.84 (talk) 22:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, Wikipedia articles are less about what "you or I know" and more about text that can be supported by citations. I am a native Marathi speaker, for your information. Unfortunately, both you and I need to abide by Wikipedia policies on verifiability of text being added to articles. Until then, I will have no choice but to undo your changes. Please do not let this stop you from adding content to Wikipedia though. Please consider creating an account so this discussion can be had between two users rather than a registered user to an IP address which may change at any time. Ps: if you've noticed even the article on his "mansaputra" does not mention his relationship with PL. Have you wondered why? I can offer an explanation - there is no citation to back it up. If you can find me one, I'd be more than glad to help you add it. -MayureshK 23:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

August GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Front cover - Rau (novel) English translation 2016.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Front cover - Rau (novel) English translation 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Mind your language
Who are you to remove me I had provide the right information SHUBHAM PRAMANIK (talk) 07:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

GOCE 2018 Annual Report
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

March GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Mskadu! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BarsaatKiRaat FilmPoster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:BarsaatKiRaat FilmPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

GOCE December 2019 Newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Chithra Ramakrishnan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chithra Ramakrishnan, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Chithra Ramakrishnan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

Nomination of Aai Shappath..! for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aai Shappath..! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aai Shappath..! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 16:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saraswatichandra film 1968.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Saraswatichandra film 1968.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

GOCE April 2022 newsletter
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

June GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter
 Baffle☿gab  03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error
The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)