User talk:Msnatchez

Donna Ladd
Please keep in mind that Wikipedia isn't like JFP forums where you can say what you want, when you want. Personal attacks are not allowed and if you continue to do so, I will be forced to take it to an administrator. Calling me anti-immigrant and providing personal information on Wikipedia is in violation of so many rules on here.

Thank you and have a nice day! --  ALLSTAR    ECHO  15:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * To Allstarecho ... (I thought I answered this already, sorry) ... This isn't personal against you at all. You have made your personal disdain against Ladd very public in Mississippi ever since she suspended you for violating the user agreement on the immigration thread. You're also not hiding your identity well here. I don't have a problem with you having it in for Ladd -- have at it -- but it doesn't make a lot of sense for you to lead an effort to delete the page here without making that bias public. That was my whole point. If you want her deleted because she enforces the user agreement too roughly in your opinion, then say that.


 * What part of "it's not a witch hunt" do you not understand? Donna Ladd is the last person I think about routinely, I assure you. The fact is, that as a Wikipedia editor from the Jackson metro area, I read alot of Wiki articles having to do with things in and around Jackson. I decided to see if JFP had an article in WP after having looked at ClarionLedger's article. When I found the JFP article, I even said to myself "cool" because I didn't want the CL to be the only one on WP. Via the JFP article, I came to Donna's article. I found that most of the information in Donna's article was in the JFP article as well and the info that wasn't could be merged, which is why I tagged the JFP article as not citing any references or sources - do you know why articles are tagged like that? It's so other editors can work on the articles and add references and sources such as you have done to Donna's article. After tagging the JFP article, I then put Donna's article up for deletion review, because as I said, in its form at the time, 1) it wasn't notable, 2) was already covered elsewhere 3) had already been tagged in February as The subject of this article may not satisfy the notability guideline and 4) failed to meet numerous guidelines for inclusion in WP. I've kept a NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW, aka WP:NPOV throughout because I knew questions such as this would arise. In all honesty, you'd done such good work referencing and sourcing Donna's article that it now meets the February tag. I'm still not sure she deserves a page on her own since I still believe most of what is in her article is fully mergeable with the JFP article, but that wasn't the point of all of this. --  ALLSTAR    ECHO  19:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Personal information
Do refrain from posting personal information like the edits you posted to Articles for deletion/Donna Ladd. Navou banter 03:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Donna Ladd
Hi! Someone (not me!) has nominated Donna Ladd for deletion. As someone who has made contributions to it, you may wish to comment on this on the talk page. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)