User talk:Msrasnw

Please leave any new messages below, newest at the bottom
Thanks for your message regarding the most recent page that I added. I made some small edits to Wikipedia before, but this is the first time I am included in an editors' discussion. Is the "talk" the only way Wikipedia editors or authors communicate? (Sorry about newbie question - will try to read more of the guidelines.) Vlado1 (talk) 14:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bigsworth chart board
Hello, Msrasnw, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Samf4u, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bigsworth chart board, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bigsworth chart board.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Samf4u (talk) 18:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Brian Trowell
Noticed you weren't notified about this as article creator. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Dear User:AleatoryPonderings, many thanks for letting me know ... seems a  bit of an odd thing to send to AFD..... best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC))

Vlado Keselj - User:Vlado1 (Moved from above)
Thanks for your message regarding the most recent page that I added. I made some small edits to Wikipedia before, but this is the first time I am included in an editors' discussion. Is the "talk" the only way Wikipedia editors or authors communicate? (Sorry about newbie question - will try to read more of the guidelines.) Vlado1 (talk) 14:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Replied on User's page. (Msrasnw (talk) 12:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC))
 * Looking here in particular might help Conflict_of_interest ... (Msrasnw (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC))

Brennan
Hah - you got there first, while I was formatting my refs and using ! Pam D  09:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * - I was going to go for Archie Brennan (tapestry maker) but (weaver) is nicer. It is nice that there are still so many gaps on WP. Let us see how far it gets. :) (Msrasnw (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC))

Once upon a year in the far past ...
... dear Msrasnw, you added a Needhangul template to the Talk:O-Gon Kwon page. There is an interwiki-Link to the Korean wikipedia included in the O-Gon Kwon page. What do you think about it, can we copy-paste the name from there? (I am a native speaker of german, i am not precisely informed about the uses and rules of en Wikipedia.) --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 18:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear Himbeerbläuling, thanks for letting me know. I will have a think  ... but there is Hangul now in the info box so I am not sure if is really needed in the main text.  There is probably some guidance somewhere that says it should... but I am not sure whether to do it. BEst wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC))
 * Thank you. And best wishes to you. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 17:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Dear Himbeerbläuling had a go at it now. Not sure if it is OK but... Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 11:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Joy of Painting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alizarin crimson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tim Robinson (psychology) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Robinson (psychology), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Tim Robinson (psychology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Wade (scholar)


The article Robert Wade (scholar) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. — Jeff G. ツ 10:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland


The article List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:LISTN. A seemingly random list, missing many entries (even the very first one, from 1902, Christian IX). Abandoned since its inception in 2010, with hardly anyone interested in it (25 views in 90 days). Sourced to a general catalogue and the homepage of a stamp dealer for some reason."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland


The article List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Arno Tausch for deletion all over again
this might interest you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arno_Tausch_(4th_nomination)

Springer, one of the world's leading publishers, now lists 70 items by this author, and rumours have it that they prepare a Festschrift with contributions by Hartmut Elsenhans, Manfred Steger and many others for 2023

Austrian political observer (talk) 05:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear Austrian political observer, I think a big part of the problem is the over-pomotional approach that has been taken tothe WP page on Arno Tausch, the defence of the page by some in the AFDs and the spreading cites to him throughout WP. I suspect this is due to a lack of appreciation of the problem of conflict of interest editing. For example if you yourself have any connections with Arno Tausch that it could be wise to refrain from editing WP in a way that could be seen to be promotional and one should make some mention of any COI that could arise.  This is only my view of the WP approach.  Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 12:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC))

Answer: I can only repeat: == https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arno_Tausch == This delition was carried out although a major cleanup of the article was finished before - all of a sudden during the debate - a user simply draftified the article, which is now in a good shape. All this is really frustrating: you re-write an article, and - here it disappears! The article now would have met all wikipedia standards, and there are dozens, and dozens of worse articles on social scientists all around the present Encyclopedia.

The author featured in the article, Arno Tausch, has now 70 entries at SpringerLink, and Open Syllabus, which is a database with nine million English-language syllabi from 140 countries and which was founded at The American Assembly, a public policy institute associated with Columbia University lists 59 global classes using materials by Tausch on their syllabi. The decision to delete the article is really absurd Austrian political observer (talk) 21:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC) Austrian political observer (talk) 21:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Royal Navy State Funeral Gun Carriage
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norm entrepreneur


The article Norm entrepreneur has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hoponpop69 (talk) 18:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of John Ross (blogger) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Ross (blogger) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Ross (blogger) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. FOARP (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dixon Lanier Merritt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Coordinates
I notice you added extremely long decimal coordinates to the Kalinago Territory article. Google has taken to providing 16-digit coordinates in what is believed to be a copyright trap scheme. That level of precision is in the 1/100th of a micrometer range. WP:OPCOORD calls for always rounding or truncating coordinates (tldr: use DD°MM'SS" or D.dddd° for everything). Abductive  (reasoning) 20:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry and [T]hanks for letting me know and jolly sorry. I will be more careful in future. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk)).... Again thanks User:Abductive I knew about the maps having heard the Argleton stuff on the radio but the other stuff, especially the sneaky use of morse code, is very interesting. (Msrasnw (talk) 11:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC))

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Louis le Broquey Eire Stamp1977.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Louis le Broquey Eire Stamp1977.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Global Balkans for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Balkans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Global Balkans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Newhaven lad (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Lyn Squire for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyn Squire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lyn Squire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Romy Tiongco for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Romy Tiongco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Romy Tiongco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. TheNuggeteer (talk) 13:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)