User talk:Msrbuka

Speedy deletion of Master Trust
A tag has been placed on Master Trust, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — BradV 19:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Further to your note (and copied from my own talk page for your convenience): It may go some distance to removing bias. It does not go any distance at all towards addressing the most serious problem and the reason that this article will soon be deleted, which is that it has NO REFERENCES.  Please read the page found via the link in the last sentence in order to understand what that means.  That problem needs to be addressed immediately or else it is likely that the next administrator to look at the article will delete it.  If you have any questions, leave me a note.  Accounting4Taste: talk 20:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going offline soon, so you'll be on your own with this, although you can get help in a number of ways, one of which is by enclosing the phrase helpme in double curly brackets and leaving it on the bottom of this page. I have to say that the reference is quite clear about what a "master trust" is.  Unfortunately, the article is not -- as near as I can tell, you'd like to convince me that they're a good thing, but you haven't told me why.  Still referring to WP:PROVEIT, it's not up to the reader to go looking for this information, it has to be in the article and it has to be referenced.  And it shouldn't be the opinion of the writer of the article that's being presented, it should be the opinion of arm's-length third-party experts -- both pro and con.  I would definitely recommend that you find more than one source to back up your contentions about the nature of this financial instrument.  It still reads to me as if you're trying to sell me one, possibly because the article is full of unreferenced value judgments about why the product is superior, and I'm still unwilling to consider it as anything other than advertising.  If this gets deleted and you want to work to improve this article, leave me a note and I'll retrieve the deleted material and put it in a "sandbox" page for you so that you can work to make it meet Wikipedia's standards.  I recommend you read WP:Your first article and WP:Why was my article deleted? to get some idea of just what's going on here.  Good luck.  Accounting4Taste: talk 21:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)