User talk:Msruzicka

Welcome
Hello, Msruzicka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! mgiganteus1 (talk) 02:26, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Links for References
Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way! How-to: Referencing for beginners with citation templates Templates: WP:CITET The Interior (Talk) 00:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Naming Conventions
Hi Msruzicka. Thanks for these new articles on gold rush locations. When naming your new articles, it would be great if you could follow the naming conventions guideline: Manual of Style/Canada-related articles. In short, find out if your article is the only place by that name by searching within Wikipedia. If it is, the "British Columbia" isn't necessary. If there are more than one place by that name, the BC part is needed. For towns, it goes "Xtown, British Columbia". For geographical features like creeks, rivers, and mountains, use brackets instead: "XMountain (British Columbia)". If you have any questions, ask away. The Interior (Talk) 19:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, if multiple streams in BC have the same name one solution is to use the name of whatever waterbody the stream is a tributary of. For example, Beaver River (Columbia River) and Beaver River (Liard River), or Little River (Cariboo River), Little River (Little Shuswap Lake), and Little River (Vancouver Island). This kind of thing doesn't come up that much though. Pfly (talk) 20:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Moving pages
To move a page, access the "move" option from the drop-down beside the little "watch" star on the upper left of the page window. Only autoconfirmed users may move pages, but I assume you've been a.c.'ed already. The Interior (Talk) 17:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it looks like you don't have autoconfirmed attached, is the move option available when you look at a page? The Interior  (Talk) 18:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The move option is available when I look at the page. I didn't realize this is how you change the name of a page. Thanks Again. Msruzicka (talk) 18:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Good stuff. The Interior  (Talk) 18:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Albert Ostman
I can't see the reason for the Original Research or Ref Improve tags. I added a note asking for comments on the Albert Ostman talk page. We'll see if we can get some details. Good work. Plazak (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Metricopolus (talk) 06:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Warmest regards
 Happy Yuletides! 

Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!) The Interior (Talk) 18:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Guides and Gurus
Hi,

Thanks so much for your article Guides and Gurus - looks like a very interesting show!

It seems that much of the information was a very close paraphrase of the plot summary on IMDb. With a little bit of rewording, I think this could be resolved pretty quickly, otherwise it could be considered a WP:Copyright violation. Some of the key issues are that it's virtually the same words as the plot summary with some words removed, occurs in the same order as the written material and sounds like the same "voice". You may want to look at WP:Close paraphrasing for tips on paraphrasing.

I hope this is helpful!--CaroleHenson (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Nice call!
Thanks for adding Mazinibaganjigan to that template! SarahStierch (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2012 (UTC) I noticed a few things need to be added.Msruzicka (talk) 22:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Would you be interested in planning a restructuring of that template at Template talk:North American Indigenous visual artists? Cheers, -Uyvsdi (talk) 03:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Uyvsdi

I would like to help with restructuring. If I think of any ideas I'll join the conversation.Msruzicka (talk) 05:03, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Please do; just add your thoughts to Template talk:North American Indigenous visual artists. -Uyvsdi (talk) 19:07, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Uyvsdi

Spam report
Look like someone closed it. I think it was a mistake related to the fact that BCGNIS changed their address, which now has the spammy "apps." string in the URL. No worries about adding it in the future, I'll request it gets added to the bot's whitelist. As for the blackout, I'm not totally happy with us making a political statement, but the laws were poorly designed. I found this Globe piece on intellectual property a good read. The Interior (Talk) 06:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Rob Liefeld
Hi. Regarding your addition back in January to the Rob Liefeld article, how did Stan Lee's interview with Liefeld in The Comic Book Greats pertain to the business and production problems that were among the reasons for the conflict between him and his Image partners? Did Lee's interview with him touch upon that material? If so, what was said? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay. For future reference, try to add your material to relevant sections. For now, I'll just move it myself. And if you never need help or have questions about editing (I notice you started here last year--Welcome!), feel free to let me know. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 22:44, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Agassiz Harrison Observer


The article Agassiz Harrison Observer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The company doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG. The only source is the newspaper's web site.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolotta (talk) 11:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ilmakiur


The article Ilmakiur has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Subject of the article does not seem to exist. No reliable references on the internet outside of things linking back to this Wikipedia article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☽Dziban303 »»  Talk☾  22:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

"Ramp Walker" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ramp Walker. Since you had some involvement with the Ramp Walker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:04, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

"Ben Salinas" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ben Salinas. Since you had some involvement with the Ben Salinas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 23:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

"James Edwin McTeer" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect James Edwin McTeer. Since you had some involvement with the James Edwin McTeer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of First Talk with Tamara Bull for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First Talk with Tamara Bull is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/First Talk with Tamara Bull until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 02:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)