User talk:Mstevenson1972

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

October 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Institutional racism seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:16, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics
Doug Weller talk 08:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at QAnon, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 08:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

The page is wrong and should be fixed but I see your left wing stance
 * Wikipedia sticks to professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, all of which describe Qanon as a conspiracy theory. It's only conspiracy theorists who incorporate the ideas of Qanon into their theories who think it's not a conspiracy theory.  Ian.thomson (talk) 04:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Southern Poverty Law Center.  Acroterion   (talk)   20:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Aspening. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Southern Poverty Law Center seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aspening (talk) 02:54, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change controversial content with questionable text as you did to White nationalism without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Donner60 (talk) 02:58, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:26, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 02:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)