User talk:Mstromberg

Welcome!

 * }

Removed bad links
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kineti-Go has been reverted. Your edit here to Kineti-Go was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.boardgames.about.com/od/chitag/ig/chitag2006/kineti_go.htm, http://www.boardgames.about.com/b/2006/05/01/kineti-go-four-questions-with-michael-stromberg.htm) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:20, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The bot is right. Ask.com is a user-edited site, full of many errors, so it is not a reliable source and cannot be used for source citations in articles here. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿ ¤ þ  Contrib.  06:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello Mstromberg. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kineti-Go, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * In particular, aside from your generally promotional writing about your own product, you attempted to link to an interview with yourself here as if it were a reliable independent source. You need to stop trying to use Wikipedia as a vehicle for promotion. Neither you nor you company nor your product are notable (yet). It's like trying to publish an encyclopedia article about your garage band or your personal blog.  When "Kineti-Go" becomes wildly popular and lots of magazine articles about it are published and it can be found in major toy stores and Wal-Mart/Target/K-Mart, then it will be time to think about a Wikipedia article about it. — SMcCandlish    Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿ ¤ þ  Contrib.  06:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kineti-Go for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kineti-Go is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kineti-Go until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.