User talk:Mswari

Your draft article, Draft:Salesgenie


Hello, Mswari. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salesgenie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 16:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

I am not a vandal
Hi,

I clearly communicated in the edit summary my reasons for erasing the legislative tenure section of the Carol Blood article. That section appears very impartial as it seems to include only the bills that Carol Blood was successful in passing. That is why I linked to WP:IMPARTIAL and WP:NOTADVOCACY in the edit summary. I just want to assure you that my intention was not to vandalize the article in any way.  Bait30  Talk? 03:54, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Carol Blood January 2020
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to Carol Blood has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't use the uwvandalism template series on me and stop reverting my edits with the excuse of "reverting vandalism". I am not a vandal. (see WP:NORESVAND)  Bait30   Talk? 04:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 Bait30  Talk? 02:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

It appears that you are engaged in an editing dispute on the article about Carol Blood. This block is in place for the following reasons related to the dispute: I hope this provides a helpful explanation for why this block is in place. Mz7 (talk) 07:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * During an editing dispute, it is important that editors remain calm and refrain from repeatedly reversing each other's edits. This sort of back-and-forth repeated reversal is called an "edit war" and is considered disruptive because it tends to generate animosity between editors and leads to instability on the article. Instead of repeatedly changing an article back to one's preferred version, editors are instead encouraged to discuss the issue with each other on the article's "talk" page; in the case of Carol Blood, the talk page exists at Talk:Carol Blood. You can find it by clicking the "Talk" tab on the article.
 * Secondly, during the dispute, you misidentified the good-faith edits of the user as vandalism. On Wikipedia, the term "vandalism" has a very specific meaning: when someone commits vandalism, they intentionally mean to harm a Wikipedia page. The key is intention. Even if you believe an edit is unhelpful or nonconstructive to an article, it would not be considered "vandalism" on Wikipedia unless the editor that submitted the edit wanted to harm Wikipedia, which is not the case here. The reason this distinction exists is because it can be demoralizing for good-faith editors to hear that their edits are "vandalism", and once again, it can also generate animosity between editors. For more information, please see Vandalism as well as Assume good faith.
 * Finally, it appears that either you or someone you know created the account in order to join in repeatedly reversing edits on Carol Blood's article. Recruiting friends or creating multiple accounts for this purpose is not allowed under Wikipedia policy, and doing so frequently leads to a block—please see Sock puppetry for more information.