User talk:MtStuart01

Welcome!
Hello, MtStuart01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  — further, Francophonie&#38;Androphilie sayeth naught (Je vous invite à me parler) 04:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Community Training Australia


A tag has been placed on Community Training Australia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  — further, Francophonie&#38;Androphilie sayeth naught (Je vous invite à me parler) 04:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi, I deleted your article because  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. You are correct that this alone is not a criterion for speedy deletion, but it's a problem you will need to address if you rewrite to avoid deletion through PROD or AFD. Although you gave two links, neither actually supported the text as written, and the second was clearly not independent, basically just advertising the courses.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: grew to become the primary focus of business, far outgrowing the small counselling service from where it began... saw interest and enrolments from across Queensland, and eventually from across Australia... has provided access to VET level qualifications to a greater number of people, many of whom would normally be unable to afford paying for study and training if they had to pay outright.
 * Equally spammy is that it's all about the the courses that the CTA is trying to sell, very little about the organisation. Employees? Income? Expenditure? Management structure? Accountability?
 * The article was created in a couple of edits, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.