User talk:Mtaktikos

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grand Dice Chess (October 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grand Dice Chess and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Grand_Dice_Chess Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Grand_Dice_Chess reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Grand Dice Chess


A tag has been placed on Draft:Grand Dice Chess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.chess.com/blog/Pokshtya/grand-dice-chess-battle. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Copyright issue
I did not miss your edit summary indicating that you have permission to use the text. However, is not sufficient for you simply to assert that you've received permission from someone, we must have something on record including evidence that the person granting the permission is the person who owns a copyright.

We have a process for this, see Declaration of consent for all enquiries.

I do suggest that you sort out with other editors whether the potential article would be suitable. It be a shame to go through the effort of arranging for a permission document only to find out that the article doesn't meet our inclusion standards. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

February 2024
Hi there, just wanted to bring your attention to your recent edit at Dark matter, which introduced some unnecessary and broken nowiki tags, which had the result of breaking the citation you were re-adding. No worries, it's been fixed, but please get in the habit of using Preview when you edit, as it can easily reveal issues like this. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 03:01, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Citation
Hi Jessicapierce, in my contribution (before it was deleted) I had opened Wikipedia's own citation tool, filled in the required infos (name of author, name of journal, publication year etc.) and it constructed itself the citation. But after the reconstruction from vandalism, the citation appeared crippled, I don't know why. Can you please help me out and show which code to use to build the clean citation? I don't want to use the citation tool again, but to write directly the clean citation in the text Mtaktikos (talk) 15:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)