User talk:Mtaylor848/Archive 2009

Proposed deletion of Social Issues Dealt with in Cold Feet
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Social Issues Dealt with in Cold Feet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unreferenced, reads like a personal essay, orphan, original research

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. OttoTheFish (talk) 16:41, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2009
Delivered January 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:57, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:LBIAproposal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LBIAproposal.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Leeds Rhinos
Have you actually nominated it for GA? I don't see it listed at WP:GAN. Putting the banner on the talk page is only part of the process. PamD (talk) 08:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Tetleys.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tetleys.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 13:16, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:015.JPG
File:015.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:The Light Leeds.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Leedsinternationalpool1.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Leedsinternationalpool1.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Leedsinternationalpool3.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Leedsinternationalpool3.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Leedsinternationalpool2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Leedsinternationalpool2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Easterly Road.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Easterly Road.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:James Watt statue at Leeds.jpg is now available as Commons:File:James Watt statue at Leeds.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Tram1889.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Construction of Leeds Tramway 1889.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 04:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:M621 at Hunslet.jpg is now available as Commons:File:M621 at Hunslet.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Just enquiring
Hello,

I have only just noticed the message that you left on my talk page on 24 December.

How did I manage to visit so many countries? I like to travel: As a minimum, I try to make one long train journey per year somewhere in Europe, taking in several countries at a time. And I like to fly somewhere outside Europe each year too.

Why don't I put two spaces after a full stop? Surely this is purely down to preference. I'm not aware of any 'convention' and it just seems odd to me that anyone would type two spaces. In Wikipedia it's pointless anyway, because multiple spaces in the source always display as a single space.

Finally, I urge you to stop smoking, before it's too late. Smoking ceased to be socially acceptable years before you were born. Why give money to tobacco companies for an addictive drug that will place restrictions on your life, will cause many to assume that you are anti-social, and harm your health and that of others around you? Please stop. – Signal head  &lt; T &gt;  19:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Ralph Thoresby High School.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ralph Thoresby High School.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Architecture of Leeds
Hi, just a note to say that I am sorry to see that Architecture of Leeds failed GA for a second time. I wondered if you had time to address some of the points raised in the GA review and those left by PamD on the talk page. May be the GA reviewer could give more input if required. It would be good to get another GA article after so much effort has gone into getting it this far. Keith D (talk) 21:28, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Leeds Rhinos GA review
I've carried out the GA review for Leeds Rhinos, though I'm afraid its a fail this time. Details are on the talk page. Oldelpaso (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My personal view is that ratings other than Stub, GA and FA aren't particularly meaningful since they are far more subjective, so its generally not something to worry about; even the assessment page says "It is vital that people not take these assessments personally". That said, the article probably meets the description for "B" so there would be no problem with changing it. There's no jurisdiction issues, anyone can change it. It is still a significant way from GA level though, but you rightly point out that your other current projects are much closer, so you appear to be aware of that. South Sydney Rabbitohs looks like a fairly good example of a similar article at GA. One of the main issues with Leeds Rhinos is short sentences that give an isolated piece of information, but with no further context, such as "Leeds won the Challenge Cup in 1941 and 1942". Oldelpaso (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Moor Grange County Secondary School in 1973.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Moor Grange County Secondary School in 1973.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:1970-87.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:1970-87.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2009
Delivered February 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Likely Lads2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Likely Lads2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Ports in the United Kingdom
For every category you create, you should specify parent categories to which it belongs.

Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards,--Stepheng3 (talk) 20:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

File:ASDA house.jpg
Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image had been tagged with the Copy to Wikimedia Commons template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:ASDA house.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Abbeydaleoval.jpg
Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image had been tagged with the Copy to Wikimedia Commons template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:Abbeydaleoval.jpg. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Quarry_Hill_Flats1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Quarry_Hill_Flats1.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 01:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Moor_Grange_County_Secondary_School_in_1973.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Moor_Grange_County_Secondary_School_in_1973.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 15:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2009
Delivered March 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Queenie's Castle2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Queenie's Castle2.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Christian Voice / Stephen Green
Just to let you know that I've objected to your proposal to split the above articles. You can see my rationale on the CV talk page. Best,FrFintonStack (talk) 02:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Barncroft.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Barncroft.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 08:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2009
Delivered April 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 04:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Architecture of Leeds
Hi,

I'm happy to say that the architecture of Leeds is now a Good Article. Congratulations. Seth Whales (talk) 11:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Kippax activity
There's a useful template Inuse you could put on the article. PamD (talk) 14:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ... but it's usually placed at the top of an article, much more likely to be spotted by someone about to start editing! Cheers. PamD (talk) 17:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Infoboxes
Hi, I don't know that many people have got Places in Leeds watchlisted, so you might be better talking about infoboxes on the main Talk:Leeds page. PamD (talk) 08:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dominion Cinema.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Dominion Cinema.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2009
Delivered May 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 07:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Hawksworth
I have offered a suggestion to your disambiguation dilemma at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names). Hope it helps. Skinsmoke (talk) 01:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Denunciating wikipedia italy
Several wikipedia administrators do not permit to add contributions regarding racism xenophobia and hate, even if including links and notes, to pages dedicated to the "Lega Nord" political party, and other pages related to people belonging to the same party well known for their racist behaveour.

Pages are blocked almost always and in case you do some change you'll be blocked without any explanation or claiming fake reasons. Even the discussion page is blocked and if somone tries to add some contributions o tries to open a discussion on the same he will be blocked for ever.

Please do something, this is a shame, it's incredible and unacceptable that a party that has always proudly claimed its own racism is described like it was a kind of scout club, and of course it's completely againist the wikipedia aims. Please check!

It seems that in wikipedia Italy there are several lobbies. It's no more free. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.80.39.41 (talk) 09:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

response
For the record, I am not entirely sure what this message regards, and if it is in has been sent to users on the Italian Wikipedia project, then I am none the wiser as to why it has not been sent to my Italian talk page in Italian instead of Broken English. Either way I am none the wiser. Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2009
Delivered June 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:13, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Conservation Areas in Leeds
Hi, The links at http://www.leeds.gov.uk/Environment_and_planning/Conservation/Conservation_area_appraisals.aspx might be worth adding to appropriate pages on parts of Leeds - I've just added one to Far Headingley. Cheers, PamD (talk) 15:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dig out your soul billboard.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dig out your soul billboard.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - July 2009
Delivered July 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Walton on Thames
Please note that Walton on Thames is in Surrey, not Greater London. The picture which you renamed to Commons is therefore incorrectly and confusingly labelled. Regards Motmit (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Leeds reference
Hi, just spotted that you added a reference on the College Merger with detail Leeds City College 30 July 2009 Retrieved on 7 January 2009 &mdash; this cannot be correct as you cannot access the reference before it was published. Is there some error in the year here? Keith D (talk) 22:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - August 2009
Delivered August 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 09:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Wetherby: Baptist Church is not closed
Hi, I've just edited the sentence referring to Wetherby Baptist Church, amending the edit you made on 26-Jul-09. Out of courtesy to you I should explain, as a member of the church, that it is alive and well and has most certainly not closed. Also, it has never been known as Barleyfield Community Centre: that is where we currently meet. I hope this clears things up.ChrisWB (talk) 09:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Golden Triangle
Hi, I've just been adding to the article on Leeds City Region Partnership and it mentions the Golden Triangle around Wetherby, York and Harrogate. This is in your neck of the woods, I think. An article on it would be much appreciated. I can start a stub if you think it's worthwhile.--Harkey (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply and thanks for offering to start the page. There seems to be some sort of partnership between Leeds,York and Harrogate but they probably don't know where the boundaries are either!! If you start a stub I'll find references for it later, although you'll probably need at least one reference or it might get "Speedily deleted".--Harkey (talk) 20:03, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Just looked again. Nice one.--Harkey (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

File:NorthernSkyCDWikiCommons.jpg
They were taken in Eastwood Drive, Swarcliffe Estate, Leeds 14.

Wrong mill?
Hi, I think the image you [added] to Marshall's Mill is actually Temple Works, isn't it? You can see the glass domes in the roof. (Incidentally, it's worth looking at Temple Works on Googel Earth - the roof looks amazing). Cheers, PamD (talk) 23:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I notice that you've said that the image is copyright-expired, but Leeds City Libraries has copyright in the digital image they've made of this old print - see the copyright statement on Leodis page at http://www.leodis.net/article.aspx?articleid=6 where it says "© Copyright. Unless otherwise stated, the copyright, database rights and similar rights in all material published on this site are owned by Leeds Library and Information Service, Leeds City Council.". I don't believe that you should be copying Leodis's images - it would be different if you were making your own photos or scans from a paper copy of the image, with the permission of the owner of the physical copy. PamD (talk) 07:50, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

A380 Ready Airports
Please stop adding this category to airport airticles. It's been done several times before, and been removed each time as a result of editor consensus. It's been agreed upon that this is not a noteworthy categorisation. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Check the history of the major airports and the Airports project discussion page. I don't care either way, but it's bound to get undone sooner rather than later! Jasepl (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Repost of Category:A380 ready airports
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. The original discussion is located at Categories for discussion/Log/2009 June 1. Thank you. Hawaiian717 (talk) 00:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bishopgate.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bishopgate.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bridge End 1869.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bridge End 1869.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 06:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2009
Delivered September 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Leeds
There is currently a discussion regarding splitting of the Leeds article. As you were involved in the previous merge discussion you might be interested in this. Quantpole (talk) 21:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Middleton, West Yorkshire
Hi, you added the mention of iron mining to this article - could you show a source, as someone has queried the info. See Talk:Middleton, West Yorkshire. Thanks. PamD (talk) 12:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

File:1970-87.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:1970-87.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Papa November (talk) 07:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Leeds and Holbeck Railway Junction.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Leeds and Holbeck Railway Junction.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 15:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey i responded on the files talk page. Salavat (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2009
Delivered October 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 08:22, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - November 2009
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! style="background-color: #CCCCFF; border: 2px #007FFF solid; -moz-border-radius:20px;text-align: center;" |The Yorkshire WikiProject Newsletter {| style="width: 100%; border: 1px gray solid; background-color:#CCCCFF;" The WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter Issue 19 - November 2009
 * style="border: solid 1px grey;"|
 * style="border: solid 1px grey;"|
 * valign="middle" style="width: 55%; border: 0px; background-color:#CCCCFF; padding: 1em" |

October issue Got any suggestions? — Add them here
 * valign="middle" align="right" style="width: 45%; border: 0px; background-color:#CCCCFF; padding: 1em;" |
 * valign="top" style="border: 2px #007FFF solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color:#CCCCFF;" |
 * Project News
 * Welcome to the nineteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
 * Welcome to the nineteenth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.


 * WP:YORKS is a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 7,532 last month to 7,738 on October 30th). WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 43 out of a total number of 2.034 articles. In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 52 is just ahead of WP:GM who have 47.

If you would like to discuss changes to Priorities, please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire

Currently there are seventeen Yorkshire featured articles:

Henry Moore • Caedmon • Sheffield Wednesday F.C. • George Calvert, 1st Baron Baltimore • History of Sheffield • York City F.C. • Joseph Priestley • Stocksbridge Park Steels F.C. • M62 motorway • Valley Parade • William Wilberforce • History of Bradford City A.F.C. • Last of the Summer Wine • Ealdred (archbishop) • Paulinus of York • Wilfrid • Cosmo Gordon Lang

There are also ten featured lists:

List of York City F.C. Clubmen of the Year • List of York City F.C. managers • List of York City F.C. players • List of York City F.C. seasons • List of Bradford City A.F.C. seasons • List of York City F.C. records and statistics • List of Leeds United A.F.C. seasons • List of Scarborough F.C. seasons • List of awards and nominations received by Arctic Monkeys • List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Cleveland

Thank you and well done to all those who contributed.

Drax Power Station passed a GA review on October 5th Thomas of Bayeux peer review initiated on October 8th Sheffield was demoted from FA on October 9th Anne Brontë failed a GA review on October 10th East Riding of Yorkshire peer review initiated on October 23rd Leeds peer review initiated on October 25th David Wetherall passed a GA review on October 26th County Borough of Leeds nominated for GA review on October 26th Philip Larkin peer review initiated on October 27th County Borough of Leeds promoted to GA on October 30th
 * Article Activity


 * Member News

There are now 70 members of WikiProject Yorkshire! A warm welcome to the new members that have joined us since the October newsletter:



No members left the project this month:


 * Thanks


 * For those of you who made changes and looked after the school and university articles after last month's feature.


 * There has again been a number of suggestions on the ToDo list at Yorkshire Portal and this has been kept up to date.


 * The football and rugby editors have continued keeping abreast of most, if not all, of the top clubs.


 * WikiProkject Yorkshire editors have been busy on vandal patrol at watchlist. Thanks.


 * A big to all the editors who help make this WikiProject what it is; no edit goes unnoticed.


 * Priority Articles

The top priority articles that have been identified to date are as follows -


 * Bradford • East Riding of Yorkshire • Henry Moore • Kingston upon Hull • Leeds • North Yorkshire • Ripon • Sheffield • South Yorkshire • Wakefield • West Yorkshire • William Wilberforce • York • Yorkshire • Yorkshire and the Humber

The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.

Assess and review
 * Assessment


 * valign="top" style="border: 2px #007FFF solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color:#CCCCFF;" |


 * Aims

After discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Yorkshire in April 2008.

Specific aims for the project are:-


 * To complete tagging and assessment of all Yorkshire related articles (See below)
 * To recruit more active editors (See Member News)
 * To bring our top level article Yorkshire up to Featured article status
 * To bring all other top priority articles (currently 15 with 2 at FA) to at least Good article status
 * To set up a weekly or monthly selected article improvement drive
 * To produce a regular news letter for circulation to members


 * Popular pages

Arctic Monkeys fight it out with Dracula
The addition of the popular pages facility to the Yorkshire sidebar last month has thrown light on which of our articles Wikipedia readers actually access most. The first month for which there is complete data is September when Arctic Monkeys were in pole position with an average 6,869 hits daily. In second place with 5,781 was Wuthering Heights followed by Dracula with 4,996. The table is sortable on a number of attributes but the sort takes a while to complete.

As the page has a link to current data it is possible to see and compare current raw data for daily hits. So far the October statistics (up to October 20th) reveal that Dracula with 5,474 daily hits is well ahead of seasonal favourite Guy Fawkes with 4,411, and last month's favourite, Arctic Monkeys, are pushed into third position with a daily hit score of 4,259.

Three football clubs Leeds United A.F.C., Hull City A.F.C. and Middlesbrough F.C.get into the top 25 along with several pages about literary topics such as the Brontë family and their works. Television personalities are well represented, Jeremy Clarkson (4,559) is 4th overall in the list and Judi Dench is 23rd with a hit score of 1,577. Do the history topics in the top 25 suggest homework assignments?

It will be interesting to monitor the rise and fall of pages on the list which will also suggest where our efforts as a project might best be directed for maximum impact.


 * Please remember...

The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis. The latest listing was created on September 4th.

Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible. Many of our articles would benefit from the addition of an appropriate infobox.
 * Monitor
 * Infoboxes

Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference.
 * References

Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR.
 * Moves


 * Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...



Written by Keith D and Harkey• Template by Jza84 | Single-Page View

'''Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS?? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!'''

Delivered November 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage. → Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 01:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * }
 * }

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - December 2009
Delivered December 2009 by ENewsBot. If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an * before your username on the Project Mainpage.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)