User talk:Mtbruin

A perceived issue
This particular article, under the Heading "Automatic Writing" (Psychography), lacks in detachment and objectivity. The use of words, such as "allegedly", is indicative of negative bias, and requires a certain distance that might be imposed by certain belief systems. In a greater arena, one might provide voice from a singular, yet shared, point of view; however, there are many other 'voices'. A study of the page is suggested, at the very least, to try and present the subject, free of some sort of ambivalence and a determined judgment.

Beliefs that fall within a 'religious' canon are given equal time, whilst those that tread in less doctrinaire waters are lumped into a catch-all box, labeled "Spirituality", and looked askance. EVERY "mythology", was, at some time or another, a very strong religious force, yet has been put into a category of homogenized fairytales.

So, I wish to open a dialogue about this practice; if any possess a complete, epistemological and absolute proof, favoring a standardized system of a loosely-termed 'faith', present it in the appropriate forum, leaving preconceived notions and bigotries at the door.

Thank you for your time and patience.

Mtbruin (talk) 16:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)