User talk:Mtj1295/sandbox

test (Trbxv4 (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC))

Stephanie's Peer Review
I like your idea of possibly adding additional information in regards to altruism as a "narrow facet". With the breakdown of the other facets, I think it is important to add this information as well. I like the idea of adding information to the dark triad section, especially in regards to the levels of the individual HEXACO traits. Perhaps one of the biggest additions you are considering is that of validity/reliability metrics, as I feel this is important for any possible tool to measure personality. I would say my one concern is in regards to how HEXACO can explain differences in music styles across cultures. I'm not fully seeing where this sub-topic fits naturally into the article, but if you can add it while keeping the overall focus on HEXACO, I think it would be interesting to read. Sdkvd (talk) 01:11, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

One additional comment in regards to your sources: when I clicked on the link to your source "Pathological Narcissism and Narcissistic Personality Disorder (annual review)" it took me to the S&T library page and asked me to sign in. As a fellow student, this wasn't an issue because I have a log-in. However, as anyone can view your sandbox, it might be helpful to put a non-school link to the article. Just something to keep in mind when you add your sources the main article. Sdkvd (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Sebastian's Peer Review
Adding in the dark triad information could be interesting to the article as a subpoint; make sure you link to the actual dark triad article when you do it of course. Since you have information on other traits besides honesty-humility, it may be worth it to make one section that covers all of the relations instead of just having one for honesty humility. Perhaps a full header? Of course you'd also need research (you have some but make sure each individual trait is covered by a source) to back up whatever you write. Bookkeeping things like making sure sources are all straight and proofreading are always appreciated by the community. Within that, make sure as many individual claims as possible are cited. I may however warn against the musical link between traits and cultures; it may be too far off topic, but writing it can't hurt anything because in the worst case scenario you do the research, write the content, and give it to a more suited article.

Slwx2d (talk) 02:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

I am thinking similar thoughts with the application to music. It started as an interest for our group, but sometimes interests don;t pane out for the sake of the assignment. Though I do like your idea of giving anything found to a more suited page. It could be a tie in to HEXACO off of a music theory page and an angle not considered from that field. Trbxv4 (talk) 08:46, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Cassie Hurley's Peer Review
I believe that adding information regarding the Dark Triad would add quite a bit of depth when it comes to the HEXACO model. It will give a lot more depth into what each facet of the HEXACO can really provide as far as information. Make sure to link the Dark triad to the related article. I also think that the way your sandbox is laid out is very beneficial. If I could add a few things it would be adding more links and citing more articles in sections where you just have bullet points. Even if you don't use all of the references in the end it will help you and your group get a better understanding of what you are writing. I would also add in more information about how the HEXACO model is "graded" that being said it is on a sliding scale of each trait. It would be helpful in the understanding of how the HEXACO model really works. You can be more extraverted than others, not you are extraverted or not. I also found a link that I could only access as an S&T student. Although these are awesome references try to find sources that the general public will be able to access since this is for everyone to see. I think that so far this article is very well laid out with excellent writing technique.

CassCass3997 (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review Response
Thanks for the reviews guys! We appreciate you taking the time to check through and offer critique. A few things I see in common here:

-Music relationship with HEXACO- I'd have to agree with what most said on this topic. It's an interesting thought, but there really isn't a lot on the relationship they have. Even if there is ( I haven't found much in my searching) its hard to say how relevant it would be to the HEXACO model itself. Will most likely scratch that idea unless any significant evidence is found. HupoEthos (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

-Dark Triad Additions- We would like to expand this. I fear getting too in depth with the Dark Triad though. The more specific it gets, the more I feel it might just belong in the Dark Triad article itself. Regardless, finding more on it's direct relationship to HEXACO still seems plausible. HupoEthos (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Other than those similar points, I'm still looking into reliability and validity. I feel some points of these are addressed in the Criticisms and Limitations sections of the article already. We plan on adding more sources to our list. Spring break is my first real chance to sit down and go ham on this project. I'm hopeful and excited for a productive break. HupoEthos (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2018 (UTC)