User talk:Mtking/Archives/2011/October

The Signpost: 3 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Your comments at Alfa Romeo
Mtking, just noticed your comments at the deletion page for Alfa. You say I have being giving this some thought over the last week, and am having some difficulty in accepting that this nom is totally in good faith given the nominators British Isles editing restriction so for that reason I feel I have to withdraw my Delete !vote. That's pretty much saying that it's a bad faith nomination on my part, and pretty much commenting on the editor rather than the article. I'm surprised. Looks like my detractors are winning the PR race. I've run into this problem before, mostly from British editors. I've had an army of socks reverting edits, and I've had over the course of the past number of years intense scrutiny by 4 or 5 admins on my edits. Check with the blocking admin if you believe I edit in bad faith, you might get a different view. Or point out any of my editing you've a problem with. But please don't just jump on a bandwagon and make comments like you did without some decent reasoning. On the subject of this nom, note that I prodded this article way before the editing restriction. And note that it was a now-banned yet-another-sock that REFUNDed the article when it was originally deleted. --HighKing (talk) 14:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It does not follow that if something is not a good faith action it is automatically a bad faith one. In this case my understanding is that you are restricted from removing the the phrase British Isles from Wikipedia, by nominating an article for deletion (after your ban was put in place) that contains that phrase you could be said to inciting others to remove the phrase on your behalf. Mt  king  (edits)  04:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * In my book, calling an editor's "good faith" into question can really only be interpreted in one way. What other reasonable interpretation is there?  It is how other editors will interpret it.  If you meant to say something else, it doesn't come though in what you've written.  Coupled with your reasoning that I am simply "inciting others to remove the phrase", doesn't comfort me that you meant something else either.  BTW if you check the editing restriction, it does not prevent participation on Talk pages, etc.  --HighKing (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

America's Next Top Model, Cycle 17 Episode "Ashlee Simpson" plot
The plot of the second episode of America's Next Top Model, Cycle 17 is not a copyright violation or unsourced content. It is made by a good user who loves watching Top Model series. Could you revert and it's not really an unsourced plot description came from reliable sources. ApprenticeFan work 00:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't feel that I am able to revert, as without sources supplied, I can't verify the content. This page has been the subject of a lot of speculation and incorrect editing that it is not possible to tell what is correct and what is not without sources. Mt king  (edits)  02:41, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Australian Geographic
Please stop your persistent and entirely unproductive removal of content on the Australian Geographic page. I believe I have made my position clear and will not go into it further. Contrary to your comments on my talk page, I am not claiming ownership of the article (even though I wrote the bulk of it), and welcome productive contributions. You have been nothing but a destructive nuisance, and what you are doing is a form of vandalism. This is your second warning. Any further blanking of content will be reported to an administrator.Bezza84 (talk) 23:29, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Feel free to take this to an administrator, I have revered your edit AGAIN as it is not vandalism, it is a content dispute and you need to seek consensus on the talk page for it's addition. Mt  king  (edits)  02:46, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have reverted your edit AGAIN ASWELL, and reported you to an administrator for follow up. Time for discussion is over, as it is obviously falling on deaf ears. Bezza84 (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:55, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 10:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

America's Next Top Model episode summaries on recent seasons
Hi there. Can you please write the plot description on a upcoming episode of every season of America's Next Top Model and can you do it after the episode airs in the United States? Thank you. ApprenticeFan work 05:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 11:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)