User talk:Mtownsley

Welcome!
Hello, Mtownsley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Magnolia677 (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Miami Beach, Florida, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit to Lafayette, Indiana appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Steve Hannagan has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Steve Hannagan. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 21:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Hannagan (October 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Hannagan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Steve_Hannagan Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bearcat&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Steve_Hannagan reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 04:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Steve Hannagan concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Steve Hannagan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Steve Hannagan
Nobody, certainly not me, said he isn't notable. But notability for Wikipedia's purposes is not demonstrated by what an article says, it's demonstrated by how well the article reliably sources what it says — so it is entirely possible to write an unacceptable and non-keepable article about a theoretically notable person, if the sources aren't the correct type. It's the quality of the sources that tells us whether a person is notable enough for a Wikipedia article, not what the text says. Bearcat (talk) 02:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

How do you define the "quality of the sources." The sources include articles from Fortune, Time, Scribners, New Yorker, Smithsonian Magazine, Colliers, Handbook of Public Relations and Unseen Power (one of the major books on public relations history). These were not minor citations. I am willing to make changes, but I have to understand the condition about sources. Mtownsley (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)