User talk:Mtracy9

License tagging for Image:Goebbels9.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Goebbels9.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 01:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 17:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

edit summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 03:50, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

David Ferrie
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to David Ferrie. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 08:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 00:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Please havea a look at External links and Reliable sources before you continue. Thank you. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 00:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for violating the three reverts rule on Jack Ruby. You may resume editing after the block expires, but continued edit warring will result in longer blocks without further warnings. Kafziel Complaint Department 04:30, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ciravolo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ciravolo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

3RR on Lee Harvey Oswald
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 23:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Bad Faith
Please do not vandalize my talk page further by placing bogus 3RR tags. I made one revert. If you act in bad faith again, I will have no choice but to report you to Arbcom Enforcement. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 19:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Notification
Considering your recent edit warring at Trial of Clay Shaw, I have filed a report agaisnt you here. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 21:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment for User Mtracy9: as per Three-revert rule, being "sure to keep within its limits" (quote from both unblock requests above) is known as gaming the system (see #4 in the Examples section) and is strongly discouraged.   — Athaenara  ✉  01:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

February 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Harvey Oswald, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''We've been here before; we do not need to go there again. Discuss this issue on the Talk page, or suffer sanctions. Up to you. There are numerous dispute resolution processes here, but single-mindedness is not one of them.'' Rodhull  andemu  23:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Your previous one-year block and recent warnings do not appear to have got the message across that you cannot just remove content without achieving consensus. Since you again show no sign of abating this behaviour, you are blocked indefinitely unless and until you give an indication to collaborate constructively. I will also note this block at the related ArbCom case.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu  23:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Mark Tracy (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit the arbitration request section, copy-paste the following template:


Initiated by  Mark Tracy (talk) at 07:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Involved parties

 * , filing party


 * Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request


 * Diff. 1
 * Diff. 2


 * Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried


 * Link 1
 * Link 2

Clerk notes

 * This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)
below the first header and click save/submit.