User talk:Mu.e.nash

Welcome!
Hello, Mu.e.nash, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 09:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Compton scattering has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Compton scattering was changed by Mu.e.nash (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959176 on 2017-11-22T06:26:42+00:00.


 * A piece of avuncular advice: You almost certainly did not consult the Talk page of the article on Compton scattering before your flawed peremptory edits, nor the page on inelastic scattering, where your misapplication of the term "elastic scattering" is addressed up front: in inelastic scattering, the kinetic energy of an incident particle is not conserved, as an explanation of the spurious paradox that an elastic collision may underlie inelastic scattering. For such a debatable issue, you must reach consensus in the community before proceeding, especially when you reverse the usage comment/warning in the HTML code, without an alert in the Talk page. Future editors who are bound to reverse your edits need to go through a forensic analysis, to appreciate you did not join that conversation on the Talk page.