User talk:Mubaoinam

August 2023
Hello, I'm Moriwen. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Meitei people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Moriwen (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sanamahism. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 01:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sanamahism, you may be blocked from editing. AgisdeSparte (talk) 01:13, 5 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sanamahism.  AgisdeSparte (talk) 01:14, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * As you see below, there has been a technical error resulting in edits on the page Sanamahism (edits appearing as "sorry 1"). I would really appreciate if you look into this matter. Thanks! Mubaoinam (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sanamahism, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Why am I being blocked? Mubaoinam (talk) 01:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Because all you do is vandalism. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * NO, I did not! This is some kind of an error here. Mubaoinam (talk) 01:35, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Can you unblock me? I don't know what vandalism you are referring to? Mubaoinam (talk) 01:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * All of the edits you did on Sanamahism were vandalism, that is why you have been banned! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The edits "sorry 1" is due to my keyboard issue. This was not intentional. Mubaoinam (talk) 01:39, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * That doesn't make any sense. And if your keyboard really adds random stuff for no reason, then you shouldn't press the edit-button and save-button to begin with, both of which has to be done manually! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I was editing the page Sanamahism earlier today (constructive additions). And I don't know what happened, "sorry 1" appeared as edits by me! Mubaoinam (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Your earlier edits were all unsourced, making them unconstructive as well. And wether the vandalism was intentional or accidental really mean nothing as it doesn't change the fact that the vandalism was done to begin with. It is not possible for us to know 100% wether what you say about the vandalism is true or not, thus we can only judge you by what actions have been taken with your account, which in this case is damning. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 01:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * When I say it was not intentional - I meant that I did not do knowingly vandalized the Wikipedia page Sanamahism. This is a genuine fault stemming from my keyboard, which I don't understand how it happened. After stating the facts, I really don't understand how this is still an issue. I have been contributing to Wikipedia since 2011 and never faced an issue. I would very much appreciate if you undo what you did and allow me to finish editing the Sanamahism page. Mubaoinam (talk) 02:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Do not contact me through e-mail or any other off-site means as you just did. To answer what you wrote to me in that e-mail, no I will not unban you as I have neither the will nor the ability to do so. And to answer what you wrote above, we cannot simply take your word for it, as it is not uncommon for recently banned users on any site to claim that what was done was the result of a technical difficulty, or the actions of a sibling or friend. And since we can not exactly send a team to interrogate you in person and check your technical equipment, we have no way of proving that what you are saying is correct, thus we simply have to look at the fact that your account was used to vandalise a page, and act accordingly. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 02:15, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * To state that my account is "vandalism-only account" is simply not right. Again, I state here that my action (referring to edits on the page Sanamahism with the word "sorry 1") is simply a technical fault. Neither my past edits (since 2011) nor any other current edits show that my account is a vandalism-only account. I ask that you change this immediately. Mubaoinam (talk) 02:28, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello Mubaoinam! Though I don't want to join your talk with others, I thought I should say something. May or may not be your edits are done intentionally, but whatever appeared in your recent edit history of Sanamahism are explicitly vandalism according to wikipedia rules. So, you have to acknowledge it as your own fault, as wikipedia rules forbade any forms of "excuses". As a third party in your discussion, I want to suggest you to thoroughly read and understand WP:NUTART, WP:VAND, WP:VERIFY, WP:RELY, WP:UNBLOCK, first of all, before doing any further actions in wikipedia. Failing to understand any of these rules and continuing to do any further actions may lead you in more troubles. Thanks! :-) Haoreima (talk) 02:39, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)


 * How do you accidentally make dozens of edits? For each edit you need to type in your changes, and then press the "publish changes" button twice. I don't see how a keyboard malfunction could do that. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 02:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The very fact that there were dozens of edits shows that there was indeed a technical fault. I don't really understand how it happened so I cannot give you an explanation at this point. If I have to guess, this could be a result of pressing the tab key in my keyword (by someone/as a result of malfunction) and at the sometime the return key. This is seriously just a technical error. — Mubaoinam.

Your technical fault makes no sense. Without a sufficient, plausible explanation, I see no path forward here. Until you find out what happened and are able to explain it to us, I don't believe any admin will lift your block. As you indicate you don't understand what happened, there's no reason to believe it won't happen again. --Yamla (talk) 12:05, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand that you are worried if those edits would happen again. However, as I mentioned before, it is not clear to what extend those edits are considered vandalism. The technical fault I pointed DID NOT alter/delete/remove any page. The disruptive nature of those edits was merely adding "sorry 1" to Sanamahism which has now been removed and I have repeated appealed that it was a genuine technical fault. While I understand that you want to prevent future vandalism of such kind, I simply cannot understand that you choose to block me even after appealing many times of the technical fault. I will note here that you have effectively prevented a Wikipedia contributor from further contributions. This is based on your judgement that such technical fault is impossible to happen. From your perspective, anyone who incur such incidents and not software/programming friendly should not edit Wikipedia merely because such incidents can happen in future. I request you to look into this with a little seriousness. Thanks! Mubaoinam (talk) 12:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You are free to disagree. I've told you what I think will be required for you to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The only explanation I can provide (rather speculate) is if both my keyboard and mouse malfunctioned somehow. Looking into where exactly "sorry 1" was inserted to Sanamahism, this could be due to the fact that return key as well as some shortcut keys from my keyboard was repeatedly entered. Look, I am really not a software/hardware friendly person. I will replace both those input devices ASAP (I don't want this to happen to my work-related stuffs). But I cannot provide any further explanation than this. Mubaoinam (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @Mubaoinam @Yamla It's false. Due to a keyboard error, constant vandalism isn't produced over a 2-hour period. Furthermore, you committed similar but distinct acts of vandalism (as shown here 1,2, 3, 4), which demonstrates that you deliberately made choices to place them at different parts of the page, thinking it would go unnoticed. AgisdeSparte (talk) 13:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @AgisdeSparte I'd disagree to your accusation of me deliberately placing "Sorry 1" at different parts of the page. It also sounds to me like you are accusing me of doing this for some purpose. I simply don't understand what possibly I can achieve by doing this. After looking at 1,2, 3, 4, indeed I'm now convinced that return key + shortcut keys from my keyboard was entered several times for a prolonged period of time, as you say 2 hours. I am lead to think that this was not done manually by myself, as I don't think I would do this unless I have lost my mind. If you are a computer expert, please suggest how I can check what really happened. Both @AgisdeSparte and @Yamla are not providing constructive feedback to reverse this course. I'd appreciate if you provide constructive course of action to undo this. Thanks~ Mubaoinam (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)