User talk:Muboshgu/Archive 12

Nagle Mansion DYK
Fixed. Thanks. Pumpkin Sky  talk  —Preceding undated comment added 14:08, 19 January 2012‎.

Yankees roster
Are these good enough sources? 1 and 2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RevanFan (talk • contribs) 08:42, 11 February 2012

Proposed deletion of Daryl Jones (baseball)


The article Daryl Jones (baseball) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

List of Olympic medalists in art competitions
I think you posted on my talk page at the same time I posted my DYK nom, but thanks for the offer! Cheers! Canadian  Paul  —Preceding undated comment added 11:21, 8 March 2012‎.

Croatian Littoral DYK nomination
Hi! Thanks for fixing the Croatian Littoral DYK hook. However, I revised the hook once again, because it appeared to me that you missed the point of the hook itself - I added a comment to the nomination page explaining illogical nature of use of the term for two different and overlapping regions, making IMO the hook interesting. Could you please have another look at it to see if there's a better phrasing that could be used there?--Tomobe03 (talk) 21:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 April newsletter
Round 2 of this year's WikiCup is over, and so we are down to our final 32, in what could be called our quarter-finals. The two highest scorers from each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers overall, have entered round 3, while 30 participants have been eliminated. Pool B's remains our top scorer with over 700 points; he continues to gain high numbers of points for his good articles on The X-Files, but also Millennium and other subjects. He has also gained points for a good topic, a featured list, multiple good article reviews and several did you knows. Pool E's was second, thanks primarily to his biology articles, with Pool H's  coming in third, with an impressive 46 did you knows, mostly on the subject of baseball. Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both scored over 600 points. Pools E and H proved our most successful, with each seeing 5 members qualify for round 3, while Pools C and D were the least, with each seeing only 3 reach round 3. However, it was Pool G which saw the lowest scoring, with a little under 400 points combined; Pool H, the highest scoring group, saw over triple that score.

65 points was the lowest qualifying score for round 3; significantly higher than the 11 required to enter round 2, and also higher than the 41 required to reach round 3 last year. However, in 2010, 100 points were needed to secure a place in round 3. 16 will progress to round 4. In round 3, 150 points was the 16th highest score, though, statistically, people tend to up their game a little in later rounds. Last year, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 points were needed. Guessing how many points will be required is not easy. We still have not seen any featured portals or topics this year, but, on the subject of less common content types, a small correction needs to be made to the previous newsletter: File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg, our first featured picture, was the work of both and, the latter of whom has also gone on to score with File:Map of the Battle of Guam, 1944.svg. Bonus points also continue to roll in; this round, earned triple points for her good articles on William the Conqueror and the Middle Ages, Casliber and Cwmhiraeth both earned triple points for their work on Western Jackdaw, now a good article,  earned triple points for her work on lettuce and work by  to ready antimony for good article status earned him triple points. managed to expand Vitus Bering far enough for a did you know, which was also worth triple points. All of these highly important topics featured on 50 or more Wikipedias at the start of the year.

An article on the WikiCup in the Wikimedia Blog, "Improving Wikipedia with friendly competition", was posted at the end of April. This may be of interest to those who are signed up to this newsletter, as well as serving as another way to draw attention to our project. Also, we would again like to thank and, for continued help behind the scenes. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Dave Bancroft
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Eric Hosmer
It was almost done. I only had minor issue remaining.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:53, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Which one is that? The Rookie of the Month Award? – Muboshgu (talk) 16:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Serial DYKs
Thank you for reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Guy Kabeya Muya, Entre la coupe et l'élection, and for spotting an error in the tagline. I have fixed it. Don't know how I did that. I was feeling a bit guilty for putting four articles in one nomination, but see you used them all as QPQ for other nominations so feel better. :~) Aymatth2 (talk) 18:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No need to feel bad about putting four articles in a hook. I had two hooks that had ten articles each (one in late Feb, the other early March). It's an interesting hook and the articles are relevant, so it was my pleasure to review it (and claim the QPQ, of course :P). – Muboshgu (talk) 18:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Blake Beavan
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Adonis García
Hello! Your submission of Adonis García at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Adonis García
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Patrick Corbin (baseball)
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Will Middlebrooks
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Andrew Freedman Home
Hello! Your submission of Andrew Freedman Home at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 01:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Robert Stephenson (baseball)
Hello! Your submission of Robert Stephenson (baseball) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  SKATER  Is Back 14:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

A'ight
Lollol n/p--Hodgdon&#39;s secret garden (talk) 21:00, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Dan Jennings
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Danny Duffy
Hello! Your submission of Danny Duffy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Linking to portal
I saw your request for help in linking baseball articles to Portal:Baseball. I would be happy to help, but I'd like to know if there is a specific way to do this, (i.e., a particular place in the articles where the link should be). I have never linked to a portal before. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 22:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I believe I have figured it out. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 22:30, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for offering to help. The best places to put the Portal template is the "See also", or else the "External links" section of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I am glad to help. Hopefully the Baseball Portal will be viewed much more this month. It really is incredible how much portal-linking there is to be done in so many categories! AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 00:47, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Chad Mottola
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Stubs on Baseball Mountain
There are no true Stubs near the top of the Baseball Mountain that you have catalogued.

I don't often visit WP talk: Baseball but today is one of the exceptions. Your project caught my eye there; so did the bright red "Stub" classifications for some biographies whose progress you are tracking. Just now I visited all (if i clerk correctly) seven Hall of Fame member and three Most Valuable Player biographies in that grade and I daresay every one is a true Start. Even Vern Law Frank McCormick with no References [and meagre content].

I report but don't criticize. You have better things to do than re-grade false Stubs. --P64 (talk) 00:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That cataloging project was undertaken by a group of editors, myself included, but not only me. We took ratings from article talk pages. I do agree from having looked at some of them that there are articles that are at a different state than their rating. Those all should be fixed. I welcome you to re-rate those articles to the quality rating you feel they deserve. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Law could go either way, but I would definitely agree McCormick is a stub. I consider a stub anything well under DYK length though, which both are; others have different interpretations of that. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 00:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, McCormick is definitely a stub, and easy DYK candidate. I may do the expanding, but I have others I want to get to first. We do need to reconsider some article ratings. Josh Hamilton, for instance, isn't good enough to be a B. I'm gonna downrate it to C. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Andrew Freedman Home
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cy Young's perfect game
Hello! Your submission of Cy Young's perfect game at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 12:09, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Paul Shuey
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:300 saves club
Category:300 saves club, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:14, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Philip Humber
Thanks for the commitment, I will appreciate anything you do. Oakley77 (talk) 18:06, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I have one article at PR and you are only allowed one at a time. You could nominate it though. It could probably use a once over.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:30, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Will do. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for B. J. Wallace
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Jeffrey Hammonds
Orlady (talk) 08:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Barret Loux
Hello! Your submission of Barret Loux at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 23:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Muboshbu, what's with the baseball articles? Isn't the world boring enough already? ;) Drmies (talk) 23:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Nothing is more interesting than baseball! I'll get to that nom today. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Cardinals-Royals rivalry
I see that the outcome of the second AfD is no consensus, and the article remains. I just wanted to say that you made some very valid points and it was a productive conversation both times (even though I recognize you didn't nominate it the second time). I would have accepted either outcome. Since the article hasn't been deleted I will do my best to improve it based upon the suggestions made. However, I also sincerely hope you will take a look at the other rivalry articles that were mentioned with the same critical eye. Many of them are in desperate need of improvement, if not perhaps their own AfD nomination (though that is perhaps the most drastic measure). TempDog123 (talk) 07:46, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I can also appreciate a good discussion with valid differences of opinion that doesn't degenerate into anything mean spirited. I hope you can improve this article to the point where it's not on the chopping block. You have my word that I won't nominate it for deletion for at least a few months, if ever. I have nominated the Citrus Series for deletion, you can comment on that discussion, and I'll take a look at some of the others. Maybe another stab at the Brewers/Cubs article is merited. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Cy Young's perfect game
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hack Wilson
Please tell me I'm not crazy in believing that each of the Wikilinks I added to Hack Wilson should be kept, rather than removed. seems to think that all of my additions are redundant and violating WP:LINKFARM. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 18:32, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you're right. Linking every instance would be excessive, but each needs to be linked once. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the barnstar you gave me! AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 23:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 1992 Major League Baseball Draft
Shubinator (talk) 19:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Phil Nevin
Shubinator (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

The baseball portal
How can I get involved with the Baseball Portal itself... as in: add quotes or whatnot? Do I have to sign up somewhere? AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 22:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No need to sign up anywhere, but it may be a good idea to run by someone, such as myself, what you want to add. As you can see at Portal:Baseball/Selected quote, there are plenty of blank spaces already set up for more quotes. I just recently added the Yogiisms. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:03, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, how about this Ron Luciano quote: "Any umpire who lasts five years in the minor leagues deserves to be immortalized. Any umpire who lasts ten or more years in the minors deserves to be institutionalized." AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 23:08, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That sounds very appropriate. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * And this gem from Tommy Lasorda, "When we win, I'm so happy I eat a lot. When we lose, I'm so depressed, I eat a lot. When we're rained out, I'm so disappointed I eat a lot." AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

How about this Yogiism: "90% of the game is half mental." AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 00:44, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I forgot to add that one? Huh. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, it wasn't in the list. (It is now, though!) Unless you disagree, I think I shall just go ahead and edit the portal page without wasting anyone else's time from now on. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 01:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, you seem to have a handle on it. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Danny Duffy
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:03, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Re-directs
Because it is 100% pointless. Do the research, see if they are notable and then create them. Don't just re-direct them just so you can have your name be the first one to appear in the history.--Yankees10 17:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

"There's no reason not to have a redirect, as people may be curious about these individuals as the draft approaches"


 * But how is a re-direct to the 2012 MLB Draft going to help them with that? There is nothing about Buxton or any of these guys on the 2012 Major League Baseball Draft article, nor should there be.--Yankees10 17:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

And to be honest I don't think any of these are even close to being notable enough for their own articles yet anyway unless they go first overall, same goes for Mark Appel.--Yankees10 17:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There will soon be info on Buxton on those pages, even if it's only their draft position. I'm not quite sure why you don't think they're notable, since coverage on draft prospects exists. For Buxton, I can find this, this, and this, just on the first page of the Google search results. High school athletes can be notable. Look at Jabari Parker. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There. They're all listed at 2012_Major_League_Baseball_Draft. I'll get to researching them when I can. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * WP:Crystal Ball. Come on man you aren't new here, how do you know there will be info on them on the article? Anything can happen between now and then. Again, the only reason I believe you made these re-directs was to have your name first in the history. So in case somebody else decided to create an article off the re-direct your named would still be first.--Yankees10 18:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There is no crystal ball issue; they are mentioned in reliable sources as top prospects expected to go in the first round of the draft. I never said anything more than that. The reason I created the redirects was because these amateur athletes are likely to meet GNG, and as the draft approaches, it will be good to be able to direct people to relevant pages if they choose to search their names on Wikipedia. If I really cared that much about whether or not I created an article first, I'd have an admin fix whatever happened with Mason Williams; I created a redirect for that which was deleted for some unknown reason (I failed to watchlist it), and then you created the page shortly thereafter. Just because I keep track of these things on my user pages doesn't mean I'd compromise the encyclopedia just to run up my numbers. Please WP:AGF here. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright fair enough, I don't mean to assume bad faith, since I respect you as an editor and consider you one of the best baseball editors we have. I just suggest you avoid creating these types of re-directs in the future and just create the article if you find that the subject is notable.--Yankees10 18:31, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that. I acknowledge in hindsight that I should have at a minimum listed them at the 2012 draft page, similar to how it's been done on the 2010 and 2011 draft pages, before creating those redirects. I won't recreate them now, because it's a fair point that too many redirects make a mess. I think Buxton is likely notable, and I'll only recreate it if my research confirms that, though I just got busy and may not get to it for a while. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I think Buxton is notable. I was actually going to create it about a week ago, but I didn't know 100% if he was notable enough. Any interest in a collaboration?--Yankees10 18:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Always. I actually just recreated it, with stub content. (I know, I should be working.) Based on the sources I see with the smallest amount of research, he's notable. The others may be as well; when I research them, I'll show you what I find. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. I'll see what I can add.--Yankees10 18:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Toe Nash
Yngvadottir (talk) 17:35, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Robert Stephenson (baseball)
Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

MLB Portal?
I have been thinking about the possibility of starting a portal specifically for Major League Baseball. I was wondering if you think this would be a good idea, and if so, would you be interested in participating? AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggest taking that idea to WT:BASEBALL. I'm not sure we should, since I feel the baseball project is mostly MLB anyway, and an MLB portal might be redundant. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for the advice. I don't think I'll go any further with it right now. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 00:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No harm in asking. I'm going to go there soon to get help in adding more material to the portal. Maybe at the end of the month when I can show them how page views increased from April to May, due to our linking it on pages. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I just checked the stats. The portal has already been viewed almost as much this month as it was all of last month. Maybe I will ask. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 02:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Lucas Giolito
I just created the Lucas Giolito article. When you have time, do you think you can check it out and see if theres anything else you can possibly add?--Yankees10 22:51, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Will do. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:33, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Cole Hamels
Hamels was indeed suspended 5 games for deliberately throwing at another player. Whether missing a couple of pitching turns is significant for his 2012 season remains to be seen. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 23:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I know that it happened, I'm not questioning that. I don't think we should be mentioning every routine five game suspension, though. I think it's relevant to Harper, because he threw at Harper due to the hype of his prospect status. Throwing at players, though, is a part of the game. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The fact of who he threw it at does seem to be the key factor in the publicity. If he had thrown at the likes of Nick Punto, nobody would much care. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Exactly, and if it was someone like Punto, he might've still gotten suspended. People are only adding it to Hamels' bio because it was Harper. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 06:27, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Humber GAN
Hey. Just letting you know that due to the issues with the reviewer of that article, I'm going to give it a second review. It should still remain a GA, but alas I have to clean up the mess that was made the past few days. It should be up soon enough. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for picking it up. I was waiting to see what would happen with that once I read the "Speedy pass" section. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Review's now done. No rush to get to it, just get that done before the peer review so nothing's duplicated. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 02:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Jeter FAC
Just noticed this now; let me know when you're caught up with cmts there and I'll review the second half. Now that Humber's done I have a bit of time to work with. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You can go right ahead, I'm all caught up on responding to comments. I'll get to Humber's article now. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

College alumni categories
Hi Muboshgu, just as a friendly heads up, whenever there is a college athlete who is categorized in that school's athletic category (baseball player, basketball player, football player, etc.) there is no reason to also include his parent alumni category. When I added Category:Gardner–Webb Runnin' Bulldogs baseball players to Blake Lalli, for example, that GW baseball player category is already a subcategory of the overall school alumni category, which I saw you added. Per WP:CAT, only the lowest applicable categories get included in articles. You're a good editor and I know you contribute to mostly baseball biographies, which is why I wanted to let you know about the categorization protocol. Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 16:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That's my bad. I didn't know that cat existed, let alone that it was already on the page. Do we need cats where there is only one entrant? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes and here's basically why: While there may only be one player in that particular category at this time, we know for a fact that as time progresses it will gradually get filled with new and uprising players. Another reason is that some biographies of players who would be applicable for those particular categories (i.e., ones which currently only have one player in it) still haven't even been made for historically notable players. In the late 1800s and first half of the 1900s, it was extremely common for college athletes to play numerous sports for one school. Many, many football players, for instance, were also on their schools' baseball teams, and so both the football and baseball player categories would apply – it's just a matter of stumbling across an article of such a player and adding in the additional category. Also, the end-goal for Category:College baseball players in the United States is to have every possible college included so that any baseball player bio articles that get created in the future will have that category to use in order to see how that player should be categorized. While having only one player in such a category might seem silly for now, keep in mind that Wikipedia is a work in progress and that more people can be added to those categories later. Jrcla2 (talk) 18:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Best title?
I want to create a list of foreign-born MLB all-stars (I think that is notable), and I wanted your advice on what would be a better title: List of Major League All-Stars not born in the United States or List of foreign-born Major League All-Stars. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 01:37, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for José Quintana
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Cory Booker
Please don't make large deletions before gaining consensus on his talk page. The part about the Conan O'brien feud is interesting and has been there for a long time - your delete was uncalled for. So was your delete about the events of yesterday, which is probably the most important and widely-discussed event in Booker's career thus far. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael2127 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Interesting? It is apropos of nothing. I stand by that deletion. Yesterday's incident is also undue, and that addition was of poor quality. It is difficult to state that an event that happened yesterday is the most important of his career. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Presidency of Barack Obama#UNDUE? Has to be a mistake
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Presidency of Barack Obama. – Lionel (talk) 03:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Rudy Árias (catcher)
I've reviewed the nomination and there are referencing issues. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:12, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Cy Seymour
I've reviewed this now and placed it on hold for the moment. Comments and review here. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem keeping it open. I'll keep it on hold until at least the June 8 to give you time after you return. Sarastro1 (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks muchly. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Cory Booker DRN discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Cory Booker". Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour  (have a chat) 03:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Rudy Árias (catcher)
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Eduardo Núñez
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Barret Loux
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Yan Gomes
Carabinieri (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Illinois's 1st congressional district election, 2000
You may be interested to read Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. I am hoping for a more constructive reviewer for my article too - and good luck with yours! - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 05:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for List of Major League Baseball teams by payroll in 2011
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Major League Baseball teams by payroll in 2011, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 23:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 May newsletter
We're halfway through round 3 (or the quarter finals, if you prefer) and things are running smoothly. We're seeing very high scoring; as of the time of writing, the top 16 all have over 90 points. This has already proved to be more competative than this time last year- in 2011, 76 points secured a place, while in 2010, a massive 250 was the lowest qualifying score. People have also upped their game slightly from last round, which is to be expected as we approach the end of the competition. Leading Pool A is, whose points have mostly come from a large number of did you knows on marine biology. Pool B's leader,, is for the first time not our highest scorer at the time of newsletter publication, but his good articles on The X-Files and Millenium keep him in second place overall. leads Pool C, our quietest pool, with content in a variety of areas on a variety of topics. Pool D is led by, our current overall leader. Nearly half of Casliber's points come from his triple-scored Western Jackdaw, which is now a featured article.

This round has seen an unusually high number of featured lists, with nearly one in five remaining participants claiming one, and one user,, claiming two. Miyagawa's featured list, 1936 Summer Olympics medal table, was even awarded double points. By comparison, good article reviews seem to be playing a smaller part, and featured topics portals remain two content-types still unutilised in this competition. Other than that, there isn't much to say! Things are coming along smoothly. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Óscar Taveras
Uh, why would the re-direct from February matter? Theres no history there other than one edit. And its not even really an edit its a re-direct. Why would I have created the article at Oscar Taveras only to move it to Óscar Taveras when I could have easily just started it off new at Óscar Taveras? Doesn't make sense. If there was numerous edits at Oscar (without the Ó) then I would have done it the way you said, but otherwise I don't see the point.--Yankees10 15:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * A somewhat similar situation to this is the Archie Bradley (baseball) article. That article was a re-direct turned into a disambiguation page. Since there was a bunch of history on the baseball player in the Archie Bradley disambiguation it was necessary to fix it, but if it was just a re-direct I wouldn't have seen the problem in creating the Archie Bradley (baseball) page off fresh.--Yankees10 16:01, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't understand the confusion. I created Oscar Taveras in February, and now you're having Óscar Taveras paste over it in May. Article history should show that the redirect to the minor league page was established in February. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:46, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Why does the edit in February matter? I don't understand the point of adding it to the history. Like I said if there a bunch of edits in the history I would understand, but since all it was is just one edit that served as a re-direct, I don't think it matters.--Yankees10 18:11, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It matters because that's when the content was created. It's not just that the redirect was created, but that's when I wrote the blurb on the minor league page to go with it. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * But the blurb wasn't in the original edit history and isn't permanently on the minor league page, so why does it matter? Look I didn't copy/paste the blurb you put onto Taveras' page, If I did that I would understand your point, but since I wrote my own info I don't see why it matters.--Yankees10 19:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Because the content already existed, you duplicated existing work. Even if the content isn't exactly the same, it should have added to what I did, as opposed to this, which seemingly erases it. If you had created a blurb and then I had gone around it to create an article, I don't imagine you'd be thrilled with it. The blurb was created in February and its article history should reflect this. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:55, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually if this was reversed I woudln't care much. I don't see anything here that you should be pissed about.--Yankees10 21:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * What it comes down to is something that you once accused me of: that it looks like you're trying to steal credit for creating the article. I created the blurb and redirect in February, and you came around to it in late May. I don't like to look at it this way, but I "beat" you to it by three months plus, and it looks like you're trying to vulture it. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to steal credit for creating the article. I did create the article. Since you care about this so much, you should have re-directed it with the Ó or just created the article and avoided the re-direct in the first place.--Yankees10 20:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * But you didn't create the article, I created it and then you duplicated the work. You should have moved the "O" to "Ó", rather than do what has already been done. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It would have made absolutely no sense to do it that way.--Yankees10 16:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No, that's exactly the way it should have been done. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The Bronx Zoo (book)
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

SWB Yanks
Good Morning!

I took Andy Pettitte off the roster, but you may want to comb through it and see if it's up to date. It really hadn't been edited since May 6, and my AAA knowledge isn't what it usually is this year, yet. I was too involved in watching the Rangers almost get to the Cup Finals, so baseball had taken a back seat for a bit haha. Kjscotte34 (talk) 11:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

RC reverts - Say what??
OK, rather than engage in dueling reverts, let me explain what my thinking was; u can do the same, &, hopefully we can reach some kind of consensus; I did an awful lot of work on RC over the first 8 or 9 years of this century, & it really grieves me 2C so many easily correctible inaccuracies on the record.

1st of all, As 4 the Baseball Career section, there r no real errors per se, but it is extremely sketchy. If anything, I probably should've done MORE (e.g. give at least general time frames 4 both contracts, 2 say nothing of at least mentioning the joint Dodgers/Crabbers clinic/tryout where both Campanis & Zorilla 1st saw RC in the summer of '52). As 4 what I DID do, it just seems kind of silly NOT 2 mention the extensively documented Joe Black scouting angle if you're gonna bring him up in the first place. And then, out of the blue, 2 just give 1954 for Sukeforth seems needlessly vague & somewhat misleading; leading one who doesn't know better 2 at least wonder if RC hadn't been wasting away in Montreal 4 a couple of years B4 Sukeforth finally showed up (whereas, in fact, it was more like 2 months).

As 4 the 2 sections, Pittsburgh Pirates & The 1960s, here I was simply correcting obvious & egregious errors (in most cases, assertions that aren't even supported by their own sources).

1) "During the middle of the season, Clemente was involved in a car accident" [emphasis added]

Am I missing something? Even the source that supposedly supports this utterly inaccurate statement ("During the winter, a drunken driver had rammed into his car at sixty miles per hour." [emphasis added]) in fact contradicts its chronology entirely.

2) "With the American League ahead 4–3 in the tenth inning, Clemente hit a double that gave the National League a decisive 5–4 win." [emphasis added]

While the AL undeniably had a 4-3 lead going into the inning, & RC certainly did get the game-winning hit, it was FOUR-FOUR by the time he got 2 the plate, & the hit he got was a single. Again, check your own source: "Then he brought his bat around and smashed a line drive to right field. As Roberto raced for first, Willie Mays rounded third and headed for home. The National League had won by a score of 5-4!" Even if this had been a line drive off the top of the CF fence (which this obviously was NOT; tho, as I pointed out, pre-your revert, RC did hit a couple of blasts of that magnitude in this game), it still would've just counted as a single. In fact, ironically, the only double in that inning was the one hit by Mays to make it 4-4 B4 RC ever got 2 the plate.

3) "This condition limited his role with the Pirates in the first half of the 1965 season, during which he batted an average of .257.  He was inactive for several games during this stage of the campaign before being fully active; when he returned to the starting lineup, he hit in thirty-three out of thirty-four games and his average improved to .340."

OK, I've gotta take this one sentence at a time. At the halfway point of the '65 season (i.e. after 81 games), which btw, came exactly THREE games B4 the end of that much-ballyhooed 34-game stretch, Clemente was batting not .257, but .334. As Casey Stengel liked 2 say, u can look it up (perhaps in the batting log u deleted). The last time during the '65 season that RC finished a game at .257 was after game #31 (of which, btw, the supposedly 'limited' RC missed exactly 3) - i.e. less than a FIFTH of the way thru the season. Moreover, as I already pointed out, three games later, RC actually would hit bottom, with a .235 average. It was from THAT point that the dramatic & decisive 16-game stretch began, delivering Clemente from an unheard-of .235 2 a much more familiar neighborhood, 91 points north of there, & just 3 points below the .329 mark at which he'd finish the season - & lead the league. (In fact, from that point forward, he'd never dip lower than .319.) Obviously, THAT was the turning point of RC's season, those 91 points in 16 games being considerably more crucial than the 34-game stretch which brought him to .340, NOT - as is clearly implied - from .257, but from an already quite presentable .305.

Regarding the second sentence, granted that the phrase "during this stage of the campaign" becomes problematic now that the credibility of the preceding sentence (to whose chronology "this stage" refers) has been utterly shredded, the fact remains that there was indeed a one-week stretch (after, btw, RC had played the entire month of April), during which, if not exactly "inactive," RC did have a "limited role," i.e. one week (5/2 thru 5/8) during which he either sat or pinch-hit late, twice staying in 2 play the field. This, however, in NO WAY corresponds with the 34-game streak, his 5/9 return 2 action preceding its start by almost a month. In other words, since the week of 'inactivity' ends well B4 either the 34- OR 16-game streaks begin, there's really no reason 4 its continued inclusion in this article. It doesn't really signify nor correspond 2 anything, neither struggle nor streak.

Anyway, enough from me; let's hear from u --DavidESpeed 23:49, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
 * What I saw in your edits were drastic, unsourced changes being made to an article that had reached Good Article status, which would indicate that it's been vetted. Now, it sure is possible that there are inaccuracies, as you're pointing out, which indeed should be corrected. However, you didn't cite sources for all of them (or any of them? I can't remember right now). I also saw POV wording that overall weakened the article, and made it susceptible for being delisted. I'll look again at the article and the changes you're making later. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

2012 MLB Draft
Hello Muboshgu, I was wondering if you would mind uploading the logo for the 2012 MLB Draft like you did for the 2011 Draft, so that the '12 draft article can have an image. Thanks! Glass  Cobra  06:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Status has smiled at you!
 Hello Muboshgu, Status has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Statυs (talk) 19:24, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

My sincere apologies
Sorry about the Babe Ruth incident. Anything I can help you with on it? Oakley77 (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sourcing. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:30, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for dealing with that problem. I hope I won't see any more of that IP editor. Every single one of his contributions was either a direct revert or a removal of my work. AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 22:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Joe Kelly (pitcher)
FYI – Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Archive 47. Jrcla2 (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Jeter FA
Excellent progress on the article. I just realized that the article does not reference Ian O'Connor's biography, The Captain: The Journey of Derek Jeter. I'd be less concerned if other bios were used in the article, but there aren't. Also, it's contemporary in that it was published in 2011. I haven't read the book, so curious what your thoughts are.—Bagumba (talk) 17:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Your comments are all very sound and I intend to get through all of them this month. I haven't read the O'Connor book either, but you do make a good point that it's contemporary, and provides the same basic "Jeter is a future HOFer"-type of storyline that would fit, and probably adds some on his persona. I'll try to find any online excerpts I can use, and maybe I'll buy the book. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I think the book goes into Arod relationship and last contract, so it can be incorporated there at least. I dont think we can call this article comprehensive unless an editor or reviewer has read the book and can vouch for its completeness. For now, I'm just doing a spot check and looking at the article's references. I won't outright oppose the FA as long as progress is being made, but I wont vote for support until it is done either.  Do you have a preference for mentioning this in the review?  At the very least, we should add to "Further reading" section in the interim.—Bagumba (talk) 19:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Stephen Pryor
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Phil Nevin
I saw your DYK on Nevin, but based on the hook ended up on the Jeter article and then the FA and got sidetracked from Nevin's GA review. Maybe I'll get to it later if someone doesnt get to it first.—Bagumba (talk) 19:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No rush whatsoever. I've got the Jeter FAC open, a Cy Seymour GAN, and a lot of actual work to do at, ya know, work. I was thinking of pulling one or two of my noms and renominating just to spread them out a bit in the queue. – Muboshgu (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

RGupta
I'm sure you had good feeling moving the arrest and now conviction from the opening paragraph but it'd been that way (ex the conviction) for a long time and I in effect reverted your move while cleaning up and augmenting today's conviction additions.

I sure feel conviction on four felony counts bears noting in the opening paragraph of the bio. If you'd care to discuss it more, I'd be glad to.

Cheers. Swliv (talk) 19:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for John H. McCooey
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Houston College Classic
Hello! Your submission of Houston College Classic at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mentoz86 (talk) 10:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

re GAN Roger Bresnahan
Hi,

All in all, I liked your article very much but I mention a few problems at Talk:Roger Bresnahan/GA1. Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Terry Doyle
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

1978 Tie Breaker
Great work on the article. It's one of the best articles I started. –BuickCenturyDriver 02:23, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Dr. O'Dowd
Thanks for your comment - I've added a plot summary reference now. Take care, Moswento talky 15:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for completing the review so promptly! Moswento talky 15:43, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for responding promptly. Good work on the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Mean Jeanne Shaheen
Please stop making assumptions. I'm a Democrat. I actually like Jeanne Shaheen. It is a nickname. Mean is not necesarily pajorative.--Dr who1975 (talk) 16:44, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not a nickname I've seen anywhere outside of right-wing blogs. When you're dealing with an active politician, the level of acceptable shenanigans is low. Comparing an active politician to a wrestling announcer doesn't cut it, either. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 02:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Philip Humber/archive1
Please note which things you have responded to as you do so, so I can work without trying to redo what you have done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * This has been closed feel free to nominate at FAC. I'll be glad to co-nom if you like.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We absolutely need to co-nominate Humber, since I'd guesstimate we both did about 50% of the work. I already have an open nomination at FAC, am I allowed more than one at a time? I also have a few GAN's I'm responding to, so I'd like to wait a week or two before we nominate Humber. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I would not mind waiting until the GAN backlog elimination drive is over. I am trying to do 25 reviews and may end up having 20 GACs nominations to respond to during the drive. I think we are allowed a co-nomination in addition to a solo nomination, but maybe we should ask for clarifiication. I would like to eventually nominate Juwan Howard, Drowning Girl and Look Mickey, but not while I am so busy.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I did not see this GAN backlog elimination drive coming. I nominated a whole bunch in the last few months and now I'm responding to multiple noms at a time (including Joe Kelley, getting close to done there). I don't want Humber's article to wait too long, either, because I think it'll pass. We'll revisit when exactly to co-nominate it after the backlog drive, when we're both ready. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Bryan Holaday
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Winning percentage
Winning percentage is not really a percentage but a decimal fraction to the thousandth place although the term is commonly used, and we understand its meaning. It is commonly reported in baseball pitchers' statistics. It belongs where I placed it. In fact baseball recognizes the pitchers with the all-time highest winning percentages. It belongs with the won-lost record. Please do not revert.Iss246 (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You may be right that it belongs, but I am not sure about that. As I said on Yankees10's talk page, you need to take that to WT:BASEBALL and not unilaterally add it to pages without approval. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

I brought it up on the WT:BASEBALL talk page.Iss246 (talk) 16:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Omar Luis Rodriguez
From what I understand to have an article the person must have participated in a "major" international competition (World Baseball Classic, Pan American Games, etc). Is the World Junior Baseball Championship considered major?--Yankees10 20:10, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I would consider it major, since it's the top tournament for the under 18 age group. I've gone back and forth on some tournaments like the World Junior Baseball Championship, World Port Tournament, and others. Perhaps we should bring the question to the group. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't say I have much of an opinion either way, but yeah bringing it to the group might be a good idea.--Yankees10 20:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports). – Muboshgu (talk) 20:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Houston College Classic
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Travis Jackson at GA
I've done the review which you nominated and have done pretty much all the leg work on the article. My general feeling was that I'd like to cut down on the number of very short sentences in places and have noted where I think we can improve the flow of the prose. I also had a query about the image used plus a question about him being 'overlooked' for the Hall of Fame. It might look a long list but it's only small stuff really which can easily be addressed to nudge it into GA so I'll put it on hold for the time being. It's all on the review page anyway. Cheers Bladeboy1889 (talk) 18:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 2012 LinkedIn hack
Thanks from the DYK team of Wikipedia! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

An invitation for you!
This task force is still in a development stage and your assistance would be appreciated. Happy editing! AutomaticStrikeout (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Moose McCormick
Casliber (talkcontribs) 18:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Minor league player re-directs
I just have a request that you please avoid or at least limit the amount of players that you re-direct to the minor league pages. I'm going to be honest here its kind of annoying when I look up a player to create and it's redirected. But thats only part of the reason for the request. Personally I think these re-directs create unnecessary clutter on the minor league pages. If we are gonna have them, I think they should be the ones that were created, nominated for deletion, and it was determined that it should be re-directed (Archie Bradley for example). Not just re-directs for the sake of being re-directs (Jose Fernandez (pitcher)). Overall though I don't think the pages should have any player bios on them and just have the rosters. There is such a random assortment of players on there, scrubs, top prospects, etc it just makes no sense. I'm gonna bring this up to WP:Baseball to see what they think as soon as the winning percentage discussion cools off.--Yankees10 20:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I see what the problem is. The idea with the minor league baseball page is to create blurbs for players who may not yet be notable enough for their own pages. When I create a redirect and a section, I always put in enough information to suggest why this person is worth discussing, such as today's All-Star Futures Game roster announcement. I agree that we shouldn't have too many players mentioned, but I don't think it's excessive at this point. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Well my main point is probably that I don't think they should be there anymore, in that case I will bring it to WP:Baseball. I think either a player has an article or not and there should be no re-directs. Regarding your second point though, if all of the players that appear in an All-Star Futures Game, is a top prospect, etc, I think it will get to the point where it is excessive. I recently saw you added Ryan Berry to the Orioles page, I mean lets be honest, I don't see anything notable enough with that guy to have a blurb. Having him in my opinion was a little excessive.--Yankees10 00:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can see that Ryan Berry is borderline at best. There absolutely should be redirects, because those are navigation aids. If you want to look for, say, "Tyler Austin", you'd type in that name. The redirect takes you where you need to go. Otherwise, the lay wikipedia user would never find it. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello
I was disappointed to see you rolled back my edit to the Florida Governor race for 2014.

Why do you refute an independent attempting to run for Governor?

If you do a search for Florida Governor 2014 then you will see that I have produced many videos for becoming Governor. I did not feel my edits were biased in anyway but instead just stated that an independent was running.

If you would please let me know what edit you'd accept to state that in the wiki and not revert the change.

Thank you

Daniel Dnblumberg (talk) 04:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

John D'Acquisto
Here are the US District court documents from my case that prove what I am saying you read it and you determine what happened that you for the review.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rP_ueVtwTL9fTz6M1N_s2stdeKNIkwQMzXOzpktn25s/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_KhLvWD1ThFx7gMa3zRw8lsUCHPU5SW89eEU9JGU9uw/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kQW7axA4EJKxaDuuli08eR682haf1WX2rzdYRHLQMpk/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OTLdahnZ2Cjqvc8Os0QfaGF7Q9dPrl2c0Cun0v4UeAM/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wGRnmqs7z0ROBgtaWQHTJvHJwXTgTODkVPMi1fDdFio/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YWomsHk__77h_pFW7u2Pn-4gv53ck1ofJTKLD_HRMCI/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-p16cs8l3VIhgfu2KEegJ4IlyYi8_VWj8iM0LnC0QkI/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l2fYZibacsMQy445cYkl0htnO3vxHpi-8icrabuxRkA/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/17GYpN5wsVOxxQZ2-02fbjdqhVkYL2fAU2CWwJaoUHxk/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1M_2zw7rWohABYM8qMNUASCTbtJu3msjz4CvNg4DZBJo/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B4PIsQoimkDb0YXcS9jpj2hj08WrKvWHrcxMqk-5SvQ/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GPzIDSCq90frwCm8uA9u156BkYD5Em8imleGAo_MSRM/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f2hzIcrQ2sm1F2wQ5VVYEaWSMUQp6wfMhOBE9D8GWaQ/edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fastballjohnd (talk • contribs) 16:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Philip Humber GA
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for editorial efforts that helped Philip Humber become a WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Hack Wilson GA
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for editorial efforts that helped Hack Wilson become a WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

More GAs
I've picked up a couple more articles you nominated for GA - Jeffrey Hammonds and Miller Huggins. I'll look at them over the next couple of days - as before any prose changes are suggestions and I am open to other revision options and discussion. If I keep doing these I might eventually learn something about baseball ;) Bladeboy1889 (talk) 09:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to teach you. As I said at the review pages, there's no time pressure from me, as I have a number of open reviews I'm responding to now. But I will respond to your comments. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha - maybe in return I'll school you in the beauty of football. No worries - having picked up those reviews I've got a few other things to do at the moment so will put them on hold (figuratively rather than than noting them as such on the page) and take my time over them.  I'll look at one by the end of the week maybe?Bladeboy1889 (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Matt Cain's perfect game
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Satoshi Kanazawa
Try and be helpful. You could read the article and moderate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.100.67.59 (talk) 22:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Trials
You have to move 2008 U.S. Olympic Trials (swimming) also.108.222.6.169 (talk) 20:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Cotton Tierney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Boston Braves, American Association and Ray Powell


 * Derek Jeter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Kevin Long


 * Josh Geer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Most Outstanding Player

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Jim Leyritz
Hello,

I see that you are very active in editing Jim Leyritz's Wiki page. I am representing Jim, from Attache, and would like to appropriately edit the information that seems to cast a negative light on Jim's reputation. Seeing as Wikipedia is deeply rooted in presenting information from a neutral perspective, I feel like it's important to respect and abide by their policies. In doing so, it seems beneficial perhaps if we were to work together and collaborate, therefore creating the most neutral of all perspectives, that serves as informative for Wikipedia users.

Please feel free to e-mail me if you have any questions, comments or concerns at s.dickerson@abandonconvention.com.

If you would like more information about our company, you may refer to our website at abandonconvention.com.

Thank you, Attache JimLeyritz (talk) 17:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Samantha
 * Yeah, but you're admitting that you're whitewashing information due to your conflict of interest. That's not gonna stand here. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

I most certainly am not. In fact, I am doing the complete opposite. It is clear that Jim has been portrayed in a poor light which is unfair per Wikipedia's code of conduct. Furthermore, I am asking for your compliance in redrafting the information so that it truly exemplifies a neutral point of view, as Wikipedia requires. If this has not clarified things, please specify where your confusion and/or apprehension lies. Attache for Jim Leyritz 19:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Attache JimLeyritz (talk • contribs)
 * I'm sensitive to the issue of how we portray Leyritz. It would be better to discuss this on the article's talk page as opposed to my personal talk page, so that we can form a consensus with other editors on what should be done. Please point out what issues you have with the page there and we'll see what we can do to fix them. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Chris Archer (baseball)
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ross Youngs
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)