User talk:Muboshgu/Archive 51

DYK for Bo Hines
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

NPOVN discussion notice
Muboshgu, based on your recent edit here I thought you may be interested in my question at NPOVN. Thanks. Springee (talk) 14:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I'll take a look. That edit was more about the language so-called and illegally rather than the farm bill vote. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

my edit
stop reverting my edit, yall love to see kanye suffer.

always trying to paint him in the worst light possible. i made that picture so people could see that it everything about kanye isn’t always a tmz misinformation campaign.

why would you rather have an edit about slamming his lyrics rather than an edit explaining what the lyric was instead of being rude and calling it “nonsensical”

also again, trying to paint him in a bad light. trump wasn’t a good president at all. so why make it seem like he never went back on his word after supporting a bad dude? setting kanye up for failure time and time again.

put my shit back or i’ll do it myself Nickiandyeoutsold (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , you used a copyrighted photo. We can't do that. See Copyrights. Trump and "suffering" has nothing to do with this. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

clearly it does, as my edit was removed for “not being constructive” Nickiandyeoutsold (talk) 00:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Cornwell


A tag has been placed on Stephen Cornwell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Terraflorin (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Accidental duplication of content
The content that I duplication in the Rand Paul article was an accident and I did not know I duplicated anything until I looked back at the edit I made. X-Editor (talk) 06:39, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , yeah this is duplication of the infobox thing a problem I've noticed with a few edits from different editors on different pages. I'm taking that issue to WP:VPT. I didn't even notice the valid content you added. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * See WP:VPT – Muboshgu (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding. Hope the issue gets fixed. X-Editor (talk) 20:40, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I knew it wasn't intentional. My edit summary was because I thought your account might have been compromised, but I've since learned it's a bug. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * My account is just fine. Glad you knew from the beginning that it wasn't intentional. X-Editor (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Muboshgu. Hope this note finds you well. Regarding the above linked redirect, which you created a good while ago, it seems to me to have stemmed from an erroneous reference to a "Lefty Grove Award" on the Ed Cheff article when I believe the Lefty Gomez Award was meant to be referenced instead, per. I've updated the Cheff article accordingly. I considered RFD'ing the redirect in addition since I know of no "Lefty Grove Award" (at least not from ABCA) and suspect the redirect may have been created based upon the inadvertently incorrect reference to Grove, but wanted to stop by as a courtesy instead, as your baseball chops seem pretty credible. Is there a correct reference to a Lefty Grove Award that you know of and that I am missing (which is certainly not outside the realm of possibility)? If not, and if there is no utility to this now-orphaned redirect, it might be most efficient just to G7 it. But I obviously leave that call to you as its creator. Thanks. Tyrol5 ▸ [talk]  02:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , hi. I created Ed Cheff in September 2012, and appears that I created that redirect to "Lefty Grove Award" at the same time. I can't find an archived version of the source I used back then, but I bet it said "Lefty Grove Award" and I wasn't savvy enough to put two and two together and realize they meant Lefty Gomez. Now that it's fixed in the article, the only two options I have are direct the Lefty Grove Award redirect to where Lefty Gomez Award redirects and slap a R from incorrect name on it, or G7. And I'm going to go with the G7. Thanks for correcting the article and bringing this to my attention. That's a great catch. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Concur on analysis and approach. Thanks, and keep up the superb content work, baseball and otherwise. Tyrol5 ▸ [talk]  22:29, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Billy Raimondi
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

My Apologies
Hi, I would like to apologize for my recent behavior. If I need to address something up-front, where can I raise those accusations or those things, as I’ve been told I can’t address them on talk pages for some reason. Thanks. -Stiabhna (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , we have Noticeboards, which can be used for general issues. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Are conservatives welcome on Wikipedia? Thanks. -Stiabhna (talk) 01:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , yes, of course conservatives are welcome on Wikipedia. Just follow the WP:5P. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sounds great, thank you! -Stiabhna (talk) 01:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Patty Kuderer
Hi Muboshgu

I edited Patty Kuderer's page, because she does have these scandals. She is a local politician in Washington state, and these citations are neutral in nature. They simply lay out the complaints lodged against her, documented lies she's told, and shown laws she's broken. The purpose of these edits was to make voters aware of the issues against her, so they can make informed decisions when they vote. Patty has been trying very hard to suppress this information, as she's up for re-election this year, and has frequently tried dirty tricks to employ that hiding. If you could revert my changes, I'd greatly appreciate it. Have a good day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:3004:702:4F80:0:0:0:1430 (talk) 17:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * This edit has many problems and will not be restored. It is not neutral to allege that she has lied and broken laws as you do. This is a WP:BLP and BLPs are written conservatively. Mere complaints being leveled against her are not nearly as significant as you think, unless she's confirmed to have broken campaign finance laws or what have you. Please read WP:NPOV and WP:RS. In no way does mom-at-arms.com appear to be a reliable source. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi, Muboshgu.

Thanks for giving me the "autopatrolled" permission - I appreciate it very much! Have a good day. - Griggorio2 (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Cannot use Talk: Project Veritas
Dear Muboshgu,

You responded to my request to unprotect the Project Veritas article. You responded with: "So discuss it at Talk: Project Veritas". This was precisely my intention, not to go edit the page "all willy nilly". As you have probably guessed, I'm a newly registered user of Wikipedia, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that 'Talk: Project Veritas' itself is protected from new questions (yes I've read the FAQ). Is this correct? If so, do you know why it is protected? To prevent a stream of "internet trolls" poluting the Talk page?

In any case: I wanted to unprotect the Talk page itself. If I go to Talk: Project Veritas, and go to 'Click here to start a new topic', I get a Permission Error, stating "You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: This page is currently semi-protected so that only established, registered users can edit it." Does this mean I can only add to the discussion when I'm "an established user" (4 days, 10 edits I believe)? Voiceofstem (talk) 21:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I see. I was not aware that the talk page was also protected. Yes, you will become able to edit Talk:Project Veritas when your account is four days old and you have at least ten edits. If you want to discuss it sooner, you can go to WP:NPOV/N, the neutrality noticeboard, where I'm willing to bet the Project Veritas article has been discussed before. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * , Thank you for your response and helping a starting editor out. I appreciate it. I will look into the neutrality noticeboard. Voiceofstem (talk) 22:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Brick Eldred
valereee (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

A request for clarification
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Baxter_329_WP:GREATWRONGS_WP:NOTFORUM

Baxter329 (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

RFP
Hello, I hope you're doing well. Could you please look at my request which I have posted to Requests for permissions/New page reviewer. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 07:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Mass rollback of KK's AWB edits?
I just noticed that following the ANI discussion, they resumed their indiscriminate linking behaviour (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kitchen_Knife, see 30 January 2022 contributions).

Would you mind mass rollbacking everything done through AWB from 29 January 2022 to 30 January 2022 to undo the WP:CITEVAR damage done? &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I don't know how to "mass rollback", hadn't heard of it until your message. That might cause unintended consequences. This edit history suggests there may be good edits that would be rolled back. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It's a bit throwing the baby out with the bathwater, but the alternative is manually repairing CITEVAR damage on 60-something articles. It's easier to undo a rollback that shouldn't have been done. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , ✅. Hopefully I didn't break anything. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll review and restore any that were overall improvements. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Charles Elachi edits were the only one where there was something manual worth keeping. For the others, I redid the rest of the cleanup with AWB where it applied. Thanks a bunch! &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , great! – Muboshgu (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Lane (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Lane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Front Row Insurance Brokers article
Prove that it is a paid article. Can't do that? Didn't think so. It's not a paid article and it's not all that promotional, actually. It is an objective article. Front Row is well known in the film industry. This is a notable company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.225.86 (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I never said it was paid, I said others had concerns that it was paid. It is completely promotional and I won't undelete it. Maybe another admin will. If not, since you're so sure that it's a notable company, you should be able to write a draft from scratch that is free of promotion that a reviewer will accept. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Joe Felmet
Hello! Your submission of Joe Felmet at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 14:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AustralianRupert • Cimon Avaro • Euryalus • Jehochman • Nunh-huh
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg 28bytes

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg 28bytes



Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Evad37 • Galobtter
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news
 * The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.

Technical news
 * The user group  will be renamed   in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
 * The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration
 * Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
 * The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
 * A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.

Miscellaneous
 * Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
 * Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Clinton–Lewinsky scandal
Hi, thanks for your help at Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. However, I noticed that the protection you put in is significantly shorter than the previous protection which expired only a short time ago. The page has been a vandalism target for a long time despite multiple protections. It's an LTA target. Would you please take a look at the page's protection history and consider making the semi-protection longer? Thanks. Xerxes Christopher (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , thanks for pointing that out. I skimmed it too quickly and misread it as being a one day protection (Feb 1, 2022-Feb 2, 2022), and missed that the last protection was for one year. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , wait, brand new account right after ... are you the LTA? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, this is the same person doing the vandalism. Sro23 (talk) 00:27, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , wow, so the LTA could've taken advantage of my error and instead told me so that I corrected it? This LTA makes no sense to me. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * My theory is the LTA purposefully vandalizes in order to push for longer and longer protection on these articles. Sort of like a good hand bad hand situation. Sro23 (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , mind blown. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @Sro23 I thought this sounded familiar- almost an exact year ago, I had something similar happen to me, with the same article. Bizarre. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 04:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Editor Skilgis1900
Despite multiple posts to his talk page and calls to come to WP Baseball's talk page, this editor doesn't want to respond to concerns about his minor league baseball team article editing and article creation. I've been trying to communicate for several years with no luck. What do we do? ANI? You're an administrator and work on Baseball articles that is why I am asking....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , Communication is required. If they won't communicate, I think the noticeboards are the only other recourse. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Cece Carlucci
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aida Osman
Hello, Muboshgu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aida Osman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Lloyd Simmons
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Freedom Convoy 2022 ITN
Per the ongoing discussion, I would ask that you pull your addition of this article pending further discussion. If not, I would ask that you provide more information on which oppose votes you classified as having no weight, and what policies this decision was based on. BilledMammal (talk) 00:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * the latter I can do. If another admin wants to pull it, they can. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Can you specify whose arguments you discounted? BilledMammal (talk) 01:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , the arguments of WP:ITSLOCAL and that since it was SNOW closed last week it shouldn't be posted now, I have said this in the thread. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you; I was hoping you could clarify which users you believed relied entirely on those arguments. BilledMammal (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * See my comments at the article; while knowing which users you assessed as having no significance would be useful, as I believe most of them presented that as part of multiple arguments, I also believe that the basis on which you assessed them as having no weight was incorrect. BilledMammal (talk) 02:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not want to name names as that is uncivil. But some opposers did say Local news, this was WP:SNOW closed on 1 February, Impact is limited to one state in one country, I thought the agreed consensus for the previous nomination of this event was clearly opposed to posting the blurb?, Parochial story, and Until they cross a line of actually harming others (eg as in Jan 6) clearly fail to note ITN guidelines to not oppose an item as only relating to one location or none at all, doesn't recognize that WP:CCC, and seems to imply that the WP:MINIMUMDEATH threshold for posting isn't met. Support votes were far more convincing. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * First, I don't believe it is uncivil, and it is important to understand which arguments were dismissed, and how many were dismissed, so we can determine whether this close was appropriate.
 * Second, with the exception of I thought the agreed consensus for the previous nomination of this event was clearly opposed to posting the blurb?, which is appropriate to dismiss under WP:CCC (although the short period of time since that consensus would suggest it should be given some weight), your reasons for dismissing don't appear to appropriate.
 * I've already addressed this was WP:SNOW closed on 1 February, pointing out that it was not based entirely on a previous consensus but on the editors assessment that the significance of the event had not changed. Regarding Local news, Parochial story, etc, I believe your close was in error. As I said previously, WP:ITSLOCAL relates to notability, not ITN significance, and oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country discusses countries, while the opposes based on it being local news were due to it only being significant to a single city. Further, the "please do not" section is an information page, not a policy or guideline, so it is inappropriate to assess the weight of !votes on the basis of it, as it would be inappropriate to assess them based on an essay. BilledMammal (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:DETCON: Consensus is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Wikipedia policy. And you're entitled to not like my decision. Welcome to ITN/C. I don't believe I've seen you around there before. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

You did good/right/well, thanks again. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , you can only please some of the people some of the time. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you only please some fools once, though, shame on you! Or something like that. Maybe this great big convoy will seem hotter in Texas. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Vandal harassment
Hey Muboshgu! I was wondering where I can report a vandal for harassment? This IP vandal reverted my edit and wrote "" on both Adam West's edit summary and my talk page. I deleted his comment on my talk page but keeps writing on it with the same thing. This user has also been engaging in an edit war in two wiki articles (Jean Paul Belmondo and Adam West). --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 03:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

It's because he changes to a younger black and white photo of the subject instead of the more recent colored one on the infobox. 121.122.73.32 (talk) 03:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, IP, it doesn't matter what another editor does. You don't use edit summaries like that. I'm glad to see that the IP has been blocked. Pinging an admin is a good way to go. If you're asking which board is best, I'd guess WP:AN/I or WP:AIV, . – Muboshgu (talk) 04:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , Thank you very much! --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 04:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I used WP:REVDEL on those two edit summaries. Do you want me to redact it from your initial post too or is it okay with you to leave it? – Muboshgu (talk) 04:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * That'd be great, it really bothered me. Thanks again! --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 04:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you repeated it then, we would've found those edit summaries without the exact wording. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:17, 10 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I misunderstood what you said, I thought you meant on my talk page. I meant it bothered me this user resorted to using that language on edit summaries and my talk page multiple times. At least its over. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , oh no I had totally glossed over the and my talk page in your initial message, I apologize. I RevDel'd the two offending messages on your talk page. Definitely an unpleasant vandal experience. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries! Thanks again! --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Gerald Williams (baseball)
Thank you for that one, and for listing George Crumb, finally. Would you also pass credits, please? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , yes, sure. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Request for clarification
Hi, I am reaching out to request your clarification. You reverted my edit on the page Marie Yovanovitch, where I updated the fact that she has been the latest Senate-confirmed US ambasssador to Ukraine. I don't quite understand why you would call my edit "wrong information?" Every succeeding US representative to Ukraine has been on an acting capacity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobhowards (talk • contribs) 02:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I see. I read it as you adding that she was confirmed in February 2022. It was not a deliberate factual error, but it was an unclear edit. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Lol
Lol ZephyrAgz (talk) 02:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Oh shit, my bad b. Not meant for u ZephyrAgz (talk)
 * Okay then. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:07, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipage question
Before I get into what I want to ask you, does this page (WP:CRYSTAL) apply to sports league standings and waiting for the games to go final before adding wins and losses to the teams involved? Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , it does apply to anything that isn't verified, so yes. I believe I nominated the Super Bowl for ITN in its waning seconds, technically before the clock hit 00:00, but only after the result was beyond a doubt, as an example from the last 12 hours. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. Now that I understand it better, there is a user who edits this template (Template:2021–22 Pac-12 Conference men's basketball standings) but unlike you, they update records even if the game in question has a decent amount of time left in the 2nd half (5+ min). Anyway, I was wondering (hopefully without using my username) if you could just mention that this wikipage that I brought up earlier is a thing that exists or something. Their username is Smitty Smitty. Thanks. I appreciate your help on this matter. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Helene Hathaway Britton
Hello! Your submission of Helene Hathaway Britton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mujinga (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Super Bowl LVI
Giving credit on behalf of the posting admin. PCN02WPS ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 05:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Trump wiretapping
Leaving the statement that it is a false claim as of 2020 is not “Unbiased”. The Wiretapping claim needs to be updated to reflect the current news report regarding the Official Documents by Durham. 72.238.16.124 (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The wiretapping claim is still bunk. Nothing in Durham's Friday filing confirms what Trump alleged. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your ad hominem reaction is superfluous. At minimum the page should reflect the ACTUAL history of the Durham filing and point of reference. – PepeTheCreator (talk) 4:09, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The motion is covered at John_Durham. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest. Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
 * The template db-afc-move has been created - this template is similar to db-move when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Agents
Hi M, are sports agents generally listed in player/coach articles? See here. I don't recall seeing them listed in most of the articles that I watch. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 20:37, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Upon further research, it looks like most of that user's edits are promoting Neil Cornrich. COI? BilCat (talk) 20:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , usually we don't. not unless there's some compelling reason (Scott Boras-related things come to mind). This seems like you may be on to something re: COI. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Yup, they admitted to a COI here in 2015. BilCat (talk) 20:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your recent AWB run to remove bold markup
Hi! Your recent AWB run to remove a whole lot of bold markup ("per MOS:BOLDAVOID") seems to have done quite a bit of damage. It removed the bold from any links, including where that bold should be there. For example at 2021 Canadian Olympic Curling Trials, where it caused a lot of missing end tags, or at 2021 Korean Mixed Doubles Curling Championship, where it un-bolded the winners in the knockout bracket. Could you go through your edits and revert those that are faulty? Thanks! --rchard2scout (talk) 13:06, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * my apologies for those errors. I'll go through the edits now and correct what needs correcting. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Joe Felmet
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Bruxton (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Alexander Bannwart
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Why?
Why is the edit to Isra Hirsi suddenly a problem? I had it up for 3 days - it was until I suddenly wrote that body paragraph that triggered you. The same thing applies to former Virginia state delegate Lee Carter. He called himself a communist on Twitter, and it's up on Wikipedia with no problem/ It's verifiable - and there's no denying that she's called herself a communist.

You say you like to spread the truth in your Wikipedia account, but it's clear that you like to hide the truth when it helps the left. Or are you going to edit Carter's page too and hide the facts?

Any explanations Muboshgu? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:4B00:1260:59D9:5407:C1C4:F9E5 (talk) 02:32, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I just posted my explanation on the article's talk page. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Posted
Posted a reply on Isra hirsi talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:4B00:1260:59D9:5407:C1C4:F9E5 (talk) 02:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Mark Lanegan

 * Hi - hope you are well. Thanks for the recognition tag and the updates to his bio, despite the sad news. Take care.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:General Surena and General Kim Yu-sin - unsalvageable
Did you read that thing? It was an adolescent gusher of a piece of original research, saying "these two guys are just like each other and nobody knows who they are". The very topic itself is non-encyclopedic, the content is pretty much WP:OR, and there is nothing to salvage for anything we do here. I apologize in advance if you feel I stepped on your toes, of course. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  21:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , I had not read it, just noticed the G13 and no prior undeletions. I should have looked at the draft. I agree that it was complete cruft and should've been speedy deleted on something other than G13. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * In an effort to be helpful and a spirit of AGF and not biting the noobs, I fear that a lot of junk which should have been left in the dustbin of history is instead restored at REFUND without being examined. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  22:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , that does happen. I do try to examine each draft before deciding to undelete or not, but that one slipped past me. It's a good reminder to be careful. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * When I have time, I try to go through the list of upcoming G13 expiring drafts and delete the most promotional ones as G11s, I'd say half of the drafts that are abandoned and deleted through CSD G13 are autobiographies or other promotional content that doesn't warrant restoration. But I'm kind of a bureaucrat at heart and if an editor has a valid request to restore a G13, it has to be exceptionally bad for me not to honor the request, especially because that's what the editor has been told we do at WP:REFUND, restore their abandoned draft pages that have been deleted as CSD G13s. I looked at this draft when I saw it on the Deletion Log and, yes, it was pretty bad. Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've never felt that AGF should be a suicide pact.-- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  01:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

AfCs and pledges
On Draft:Mac Lane coherence theorem, Draft:Frobenius formula, Draft:Automorphism of a Lie algebra, and Draft:Matrix factorizations (algebra), your (templated) response does not fit, as these drafts were not AfC submissions, nor did the requester make a pledge during the previous undeletion. Even in one of the current requests where he says, asking for actionable items borders on WP:BURO. Jay (talk) 04:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , I suppose I've misread the purpose of that response? I saw that these were drafts that were undeleted and then not worked on. To reduce cruft from that page, like in the above section when I undeleted a bad draft, I've seen others and have started myself asking them if they are going to work on the article, because it seems like a lot of them want the content up as a pseudoarticle with no plan to do anything with it. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I have attempted to clarify the doc . Jay (talk) 11:20, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * , thanks, that helps. I'll only use it in cases where it was an AfC submission that was previously undeleted and not worked on. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Royce Clayton
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Royce Clayton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Royce Clayton
The article Royce Clayton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Royce Clayton for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Modussiccandi
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg BOZ • Brookie (deceased) • Jackmcbarn • Jamesday • Jonathunder • Master of Puppets • Saravask



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc

Guideline and policy news
 * A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
 * A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.

Technical news
 * The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project.
 * Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022.
 * The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.

Arbitration
 * Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.

Miscellaneous
 * The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
 * Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
 * The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Will Lamb (baseball) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Will Lamb (baseball) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Will Lamb (baseball) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SportingFlyer  T · C  20:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

"Deidre DeJear" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Deidre DeJear and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 10:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
 * 🇨🇽 AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
 * Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
 * GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.
 * 🇺🇳 Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.

These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

FAR for J. R. Richard
I have nominated J. R. Richard for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 22:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Why do you purposely lie to fit your agenda?
You are falsely attributing something as a fact when the definition of impeachment is a formal accusation. You should remove yourself from Wikipedia for being such lying piece of shít. Either you are lying or you are a complete idiot. One of the two. 137.119.70.186 (talk) 01:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I sure do love my fan mail. Here's some reading material to get you up to speed on how Rudy Giuliani and others conspired to smear Yovanovitch and get her removed from her position of ambassador to Ukraine. Looking forward to talking to you about what you learn from these sources! – Muboshgu (talk) 01:26, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

I never said there wasn't a smear campaign... I said she made allegations when I put alleged and allegedly when I was referring to what she said in Congress about her opinion on the sitution which were allegations that weren't proven as fact. I never disputed the Smear Campaign. Lol Steezymac23 (talk) 01:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Go read the dictionary I feel you don't know what the words you use actually mean. As evidenced by you saying it was proven fact because he was impeached. Do you know what impeached means? Cause it doesn't mean that it was proven. Steezymac23 (talk) 01:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The facts are clear. There is no "alleged" to what Trump and his people tried to do with Ukraine. They put Ukraine in a weaker position, enabling the current invasion. These are facts, as uncomfortable as they appear to be for you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:45, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Royce Clayton
The article Royce Clayton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Royce Clayton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Russell Wilson
Sorry, I think that my Russell Wilson edit was good. It specifically said "reports arose", not that he was traded to the Broncos. SteelerFan1933 (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , the article doesn't include the reports about the trade to the Bears, correct? – Muboshgu (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Correct. That said, I want to give a quick thank you for being such a good Wikipedian. SteelerFan1933 (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Of course I know your edit was in good faith btw, no need to worry about that part. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * But I thought the bears trade surfaced With the addition that the Seahawks declined. What's more, we do not know much about the offered trade. SteelerFan1933 (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

New message from InterstateFive
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports) § Protected edit request on 9 March 2022 (5). &#x0020;My edit request was for the actual page, not the talk page. InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 21:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * – Muboshgu (talk) 21:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

MLB lockout
Is it safe to proceed with updating team pages for the 2022 season? For example, updating schedules to reflect that April 7/8 is the first game and things like that. Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 01:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I'd say so, since the owners and MLBPA have ratified the CBA. A steady stream of free agent signing reports that are premature are coming. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Okay. Sounds good. And thanks for the warning about incoming premature reports. I appreciate your solid work and dedication to the MLB pages on Wikipedia. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 01:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Something else for you
Hey, last line of this section uses a direct source from NATO back from 2019. You should revert it and call the guy out for WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Fephisto (talk) 14:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , When asked if their country should defend a fellow NATO ally against a potential attack from Russia, a median of 50% across 16 NATO member states say their country should not defend an ally, compared with 38% who say their country should defend an ally against a Russian attack. It's Pew Research, not NATO for one. It isn't OR/SYNTH, because it's directly supported by the source, though that line could use some copy editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Page Addition - Cameron Gibbens
Hey Muboshgu.

Cameron Gibbens here. Australian professional pitcher for the Los Angeles Dodgers organisation. I came across your page and found you create pages for a few friends of mine (Baseball Athletes ,Jon Kennedy, Daniel Mcgrath). I would love for you to create my page on Wikipedia.

Could you please do this for me? Is there any process I need to go through.

My email is cameronfrost2@gmail.com

Let me know.

Thank you in advance.

Regards,

Cameron Gibbens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.218.98 (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Cameron. In the cases of Jon Kennedy (baseball) and Daniel McGrath, they met our notability guidelines because they played for the Australian national baseball team. Have you? Are there reliable sources of your career that would demonstrate notability? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey Muboshgu. Thanks for the response. In my case there are a few sources that can be considered notable. for example: Minor League Profile Page, Tulsa Drillers Roster, Baseball Reference and a variety of other news publications. will that suffice? 24.252.218.98 (talk) 23:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Also a few links to wikipedia pages i am referenced in
 * Los Angeles Dodgers Minor League Players
 * Melbourne Aces 24.252.218.98 (talk) 23:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but those alone are pages that every minor league player is mentioned in. I hope you have a great season. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:39, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Did I miss something?
Has the A’s-Braves trade been officially announced by either side? GoWarriors151718 (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , it appears to have been – Muboshgu (talk) 18:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Alright. Fair enough. Thanks for the source. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks also, Muboshgu. I was coming here to ask the same question. BilCat (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Trades get done faster than FA signings, for whatever reason. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Giants–Jets rivalry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giants–Jets rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Giants–Jets rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk)  @ 19:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Protection of NSPORT
Hi Muboshgu

The question has already been worked out on talk in an RFC; there is a consensus for those changes. Some editors disagree with those changes, but that doesn't allow them to reject their implementation. BilledMammal (talk) 22:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * There's an edit war. I stopped it. That's all for my involvement with that RfC and its implementation. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * There is an effort by editors opposed to the consensus to prevent its implementation. As such, I don't believe you can implement page protection and wipe your hand of the matter, as there is a consensus that indisputably needs to be implemented. I note that both Levivich and I have directed comments towards you at the talk page of NSPORT; I believe it would be beneficial to respond to those comments and provide additional guidance in the context of your page protection. BilledMammal (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I absolutely can. If there are issues with implementation, those need to be resolved. I am not versed enough in this issue to dive into it and I don't have the time to either. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
 * There are no issues with implementation; the consensus is clear that all criteria based solely on participation need to be removed. There are no editors who disagree with what constitutes participation (with the exception of managers, coaches etc, which was being discussed on the talk page and was unrelated to the edit war you saw), but there are editors who disagree with that consensus, and that is where the issue is coming from. I understand that you don't have time to become involved in this, but in that case I would ask that you lift your protection and allow another admin, with sufficient time to look into the situation, to reimplement if they believe that would be appropriate. BilledMammal (talk) 00:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't think 3 days is long enough! I'm willing to reimpose protection if the edit warring resumes on March 12th. The two sides are just too entrenched to be satisfied with gradual changes. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Liz, as an uninvolved admin with hopefully more time available, could you take a look at the situation and provide some guidance on how to implement the consensus? BilledMammal (talk) 01:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Please sort this out, there are people voting at AfD according to the old guidelines that do not reflect the consensus achieved in the RfC. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This is beyond me to "sort out". Go to Administrators%27_noticeboard. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Please partially block edit-warring editors instead of fully-protecting the page. The rest of us would like to do some work. Thanks, Levivich 21:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , I haven't checked in there recently. What work is agreed upon? – Muboshgu (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * (Thanks for the quick response!) Actually, all of the recent edits are "agreed-upon":
 * Here is the 12kb edit just before your first protection
 * Here is the 2kb edit just before your second protection
 * The changes made today are different from the changes that were made last time around, the difference being that the changes made today only changed the things that were undisputed (i.e., not being reviewed at AN) and/or that were agreed-upon in recent discussions during the recent page protection (changing "presumed to be notable" to "significant coverage is likely to exist" per subproposal #8, which is not under review, and was confirmed at WT:NSPORTS (the first one).
 * I may have missed some aspect of today's changes that do not have consensus, but I posit that editors have made progress over the weekend during the initial round of full protection, and we are now at the point where we can implement some changes, which are not controversial, while holding off on implementing other changes that are still being discussed. We've narrowed the points of disagreement, and further editing will help us narrow the remaining points of disagreement. At this point, I think full protection is counterproductive, and instead what needs to happen is the more targeted exemption of those editors who are editing against, rather than towards, consensus. (NB: one such editor has already been p-blocked, a second has been warned.)
 * I get the whole protection-v-blocking balance, but I think today, the scales weigh towards blocking. Levivich 22:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , unfortunately I will have to delay response because of IRL commitments but I'll be back to this later today. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please don't rush back on my account. I left the above message before I saw Wug's pblock and message below. I appreciate you taking the time to engage with me on this. I'm sure you and Wug can figure it out without me, and I think I'd better bow out of this part to simplify things. Thanks again for the prompt response and considering my point of view. Levivich 23:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Please don't rush back on my account. I left the above message before I saw Wug's pblock and message below. I appreciate you taking the time to engage with me on this. I'm sure you and Wug can figure it out without me, and I think I'd better bow out of this part to simplify things. Thanks again for the prompt response and considering my point of view. Levivich 23:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

NSPORTS
Hi Muboshgu, I just saw your protection at WP:NSPORTS and wanted to get on the same page (cc ). I warned both Avilich and Nfitz about edit warring. About 15 minutes after I warned them, and simultaneous with acknowledging the warning. Nfitz reverted again. I p-blocked as a clear violation of edit warring, but it seems moot now given the protection. How should we move forward here? — Wug·a·po·des​ 22:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Levivich is also making the case above for p-blocks. I could see doing that instead. I have to be busy IRL for a little bit now, so if you want to lower protection that's fine by me. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries, I also had meatspace stuff to finish up. I think the protection is fine for now, though I guess I'm wondering how we unwind this. My concern in lifting protection right now is that someone's next edit is going to be a revert, so I'd prefer the most recent edit request be resolved first. As for the block, I'm going to leave it be for now in case the page does get unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Mobushgu, was this edit made on the correct page? I'm a bit confused because you've responded to an edit request with a comment about unprotecting and p-blocks which is not what's being requested there. I don't expect you to be the one to restore the pre-edit-warring version but I was surprised to see you actively oppose it. –dlthewave ☎ 02:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , I thought I had protected the pre-edit warring version and do not know what the differences are between the two versions, as I hadn't looked. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * See this diff. The version that was essentially stable since the 12 March included the language of subproposal #8 ("Significant coverage is likely to exist"), and you must have inadvertently protected the version edit-warred by Nfitz which uses "presumed notable". All we're asking is that the version before today's edit warring be restored, as described in the edit request at NSPORTS. I think this is why you're getting so much push-back. –dlthewave ☎ 03:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Surely the version previously frozen was the stable version, from when the review started and it was frozen. Surely we should always go the status quo. Though I don't know why NSPORTS wasn't originally frozen to the pre-RFC state ... Nfitz (talk) 05:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Helene Hathaway Britton
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Helene Hathaway Britton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Helene Hathaway Britton
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada: Revision history
The source in this article wasn't linking to Front Row Insurance website. It was linking to SOCAN website, where Front Row is mentioned. So, how is that only being done for self-promotion purposes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.224.228 (talk) 19:51, 15 March 2022 (UTC)


 * You're adding it here for promotional purposes. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Marty Flynn
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Special day
wow a walk down memory lane there. I remember, I was playing NHL 07, Robert Müller (ice hockey) became my star goalie, and I realized he didn't have a wiki page, so later that day I created it. RIP Robert. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

 * And the 15th anniversary of my first edit is also the day of my 500th DYK. Who'd have guessed? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Harassment
I know this doesn't involve me but it involves someone that I have worked with a lot this past year and so I am looking out for them. Anyway, I noticed that there are two very harsh messages on his talk page that I think would fall under WP: HARASS. The user's page is Smitty Smitty. Please could you look into this? Thanks. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 04:58, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi again, It looks like the writer of those comments figured out that it wasn't smart to write that on Smitty's page and removed it. Thanks anyway for the assist. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 06:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , sorry, just seeing this now. Any disputes that can't be worked out can to go the appropriate noticeboard. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Russell Wilson
We realize you must be a huge Seahawks fan and this was tough for you, but in the future we need you to check your personal emotions at the door when you come onto Wikipedia to contribute. Facts are facts, and whether you like them or not they need to be published accurately.

Thank you to the other admin who stepped in and updated Wilson’s and the Broncos’ pages. 2601:283:4B80:5760:29AE:5623:3864:D614 (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I am not a Seahawks fan, try again. I do agree that you guys need to check your emotions, and your facts. The deal was completed on March 16 after 4pm Eastern time, not before, and that's when we made the change. The "other admin" is in agreement with this, because that's the facts. League business couldn't be conducted until March 16 at 4pm Eastern! – Muboshgu (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I think full protection would have prevented the trade. I'm doing that for my favorite teams now.—Bagumba (talk) 08:12, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , why hadn't I thought of that??? I'm gonna go ahead and build the most awesome MLB team and protect the articles to make it real and celebrate my 2022 World Series championship in advance. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Damn, I wasn't quick enough to save Luke Voit. Sad. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Since when are JSTOR and History News Network "poor quality sources"?
Given your edit summary here, it appears you insinuate those two sites are "poor quality." —  (debate me) • (my accomplishments) 00:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I was more focused on the Washington Examiner and Mediaite. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Even if the case could be made that those two sources fail to meet the threshold for reliable citations, the History News Network and JSTOR ones still stand as reputable cites. And yet you insist on removing my clarification in the lede. —  (debate me) • (my accomplishments) 00:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I insist on removing WP:UNDUE content from the lead, like your attempt to tie Sanger to that one KKK member. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:24, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Helene Hathaway Britton
The article Helene Hathaway Britton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Helene Hathaway Britton for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Correction
Hello Mr. Muboshgu I did removed that information since it’s inaccurate. I work for Mr. Iglesias and was advised to remove it or corrected. Thank you Tenay40 (talk) 03:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

NSPORTS edit requests
Hi, would you be willing to look at the three edit requests I made at NSPORTS on 19 March? They're just correcting small errors and should be pretty straightforward to change. –dlthewave ☎ 15:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , I'll take a look in a minute. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Heads up...
I just reverted an edit made prematurely on a standings grid (Pac-12 women) regarding a game (that still had 2 min to go) saying that one team had lost. And the thing was that the edit was made like 5 real time min before I reverted it so they made a call on it when there was still quite a bit of time to go. The user is KingSkyLord. Please keep an eye out for them. Thanks. Hopefully we can keep this again between the two of us. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 04:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , you do realize that this talk page is public, right? That user could see this if they happen to come by. Are you messaging them on talk pages? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * After thinking about this, I shouldn’t have said anything. This was my mistake and let’s just move on from this. If that person has a bone to pick with me now, I’ll deal with it but I didn’t act in the way that I should have. I made a mistake. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry for lurking. It's Madness. In March it's very hard not to lean on the "enter" key even when we're normally quite reasonable. Last night I was shouting at the TV myself. GoWarriors151718, give yourself (and others) some slack. And thanks for all the hard work this year on those bracket-related articles. BusterD (talk) 16:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , sheesh, lurking is only allowed when you deploy the notice! I agree that everyone should just take a breath and remember that this is just a game. But also remember what the yogi said, it ain't over 'til it's over. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not over until Nika Mühl says so. She's my new hero. BusterD (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words. I appreciate it. I have taken my deep breath and I am deciding that I am going to move on from this and hopefully the other person will to without much fuss. And I like that quote that you used Muboshgu. You never know how these games will end. GoWarriors151718 (talk) 17:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Biden Ukraine page sanctions
The sanctions at that page are not being enforced correctly or fairly. How can we remedy that? As it stands now the experienced editors are receiving warnings and the inexperienced editors are being blocked. Isn't this backwards from how it should be? Mr Ernie (talk) 20:17, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , good question. Who is the admin who put the sanctions on the page? We can bring violations to them. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Found it at Arbitration enforcement log. It was, who I won't bother with a ping. Could check in with them, or really any uninvolved admin. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The solution is simply to remove the 1RR restriction. Then the non-consensus edits can be reverted and we won't run short of editors with a revert to spare. The reason experienced editors are warned is because they are removing bad edits when an inexperiened editor makes a non-consensus addition.<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 22:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , I don't know that that's the best solution, but that would also require an uninvolved admin. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

You Tube
Hi Muboshgu! I see you reverted the edition I made to the Will Smith page and I dont have a problem with that at all, because after I wrote about the incident, I noticed that it was already written about in another area of the page. One thing about you tube videos, though: sometimes they are the only source we have about an incident (for example, something that happened during a particular boxing fight) so, depending on the incident, it might be appropriate to use You Tube as a source or not (I mean, they do bare, and might actually be the only, witness sometimes to important happenings, specially on minor but important events such as a sports event)

Thanks and God bless! Antonio The Barking Dog Martin (say it to me) 23:35, March 28, 2022 (UTC)
 * , YouTube videos are "generally unreliable" per WP:RSPYT. They work better as external links than inline citations. And in this particular case, we have a ton of articles and thinkpieces written on the event so we don't need to rely on YouTube. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:42, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Right..like I said, I don't have a problem with your revert. God bless!Antonio The Lovely Beast Martin (say it to me) 00:00, March 29, 2022 (UTC) Antonio Martin (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Surprise
NSPORTS edit warring resumes.—Bagumba (talk) 05:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * And fully proetected again.—Bagumba (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , this is my shocked face. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Triple-A West
Template:Triple-A West has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Helene Hathaway Britton
The article Helene Hathaway Britton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Helene Hathaway Britton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Cy Block
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Ross Horning
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

PRUMT-16
Hi Muboshgu.

Of course it is a hoax. It is an April fool's joke. Sorry that I got the timing wrong. It'll be April 1 in 30 minutes as per UTC as per the guideline.

What is the problem with it?

Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 23:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , see Rules for Fools. It says not to use talk pages, and COVID-19 is not a joking topic. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you read it? It is not actually joking about COVID-19.  In fact it acknowledges the seriousness of it.  (The talk page posts were not jokes either.)  Apart from getting the timing not quite right as far as I can see I have complied with all Rules for Fools.  Eno Lirpa (talk) 23:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The similarity of the terms PRUMT-16 and COVID-19 and your posting this on a COVID-19 talk page are just coincidences then.... – Muboshgu (talk) 02:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * No. I was making a factual statement about where people who might have an interest in geopolitics and epidemiology might find some homor on the subjects, something we all need I bit more of these days I think.  The PRUMT-16 was I thought in line with the WHO's format and in that sense it would be similar to any WHO designation, but it is not a dig at COVID-19. Eno Lirpa (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you read it? It literally says There is a precedent for deleting COVID-19 joke pages. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I did, several times. The point is that the joke is not about COVID-19.  See also my talk page. Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 03:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh I get it. It's about COVID-19. It's also not funny. Now you're submitting it for review? At midnight, I'm deleting it again, unless someone beats me to it. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Decided to do it myself. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually it is not about COVID, but c'est la vie. Re, the SALT, rest assured I have been on and off Wikipedia for 14 years, so I know how things work. I would not have recreated it again.  In line with your page deletion, can you also please revdel the section on my talk page regarding the mock interview.  Regards. Eno Lirpa (talk) 23:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * That doesn't fall under the criteria for redaction as far as I can see. You can put what you want in your userspace that doesn't violate the CSD. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Will Smith
Do you think that it is time for an RfC? I thought consensus was clear, but someone else thought otherwise (Special:Diff/1080545047)). A shame what a great waste of editor time this is, if only people stopped trying to be a news sevice. 15 (talk) 08:47, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , it may still be early for an RfC, and it looks to me that the poll has trended towards inclusion. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Royce Clayton
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jumbo Brown, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Class D.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Bobby Dalbec (Boston Red Sox)
I’ve now edited twice and been twice denied. The issue is the country of birth and early childhood history of Bobby Dalbec. A good portion of New England, and I, heard two NESN announcers discuss the facts during a spring training game this year. NESN is wholly owned by the Red Sox. I included the particulars stated, that he and his older sister were adopted in South Korea when Bobby was 5 mos. old. If I included Seoul as the City he was adopted in, I assure you it’s as correct. I’m not certain at this point. I suspect the birthdate given, and putting “Seattle” next to it is misleading. In my first attempt, I included the names of his noble parents - I’ll cite Wiki for that. Sincerely, Evan Kaler Pinto Jamestown, RI Skitstoval (talk) 23:12, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * , Bobby Dalbec was not born in Seoul or adopted. He was born in Seattle. Here's a story from last year about his early life, which makes no mention of adoption. There is a member of the Red Sox who was adopted from Seoul at five months of age, and has an older sister who was also adopted from South Korea: Rob Refsnyder. You must be conflating Bobby for Rob. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Your last edit on Invasion of Ukraine was reverted again. Did you see this. ErnestKrause (talk) 23:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , I see. In fairness to them, they addressed the only point that I raised in my edit summary. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your comment about Epoch Times
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Epoch_Times_pov_warrior Seriously, that was exactly my point, the quotes you copied do not explicitly say that ET says Qanon is true. They say implicit things in the hope the reader would think that. They say "conspiracies related to Qanon", but it doesn't have to do with Qanon. e.g. so many news outlets today talk about Hunter Biden's international ties, is that Qanon?! This is exactly a hit piece, were you make the reader understand what you want them to, without being open to libel.

This especially blows my mind, because I had been a reader of ET for many months before I ever knew anything about Qanon, they just never talked about it, nor any other news I followed. I think the first time I ever heard about that was two years ago when I happened to come across the ET article on wikipedia. Then when I found out what it was, it's quite easy to realise it was some sort of fake news or even psy-op, in this case used as a strawman.

I appologize for the intrusion of respoding here, I believe you deserve a response if you wanted any, otherwise just delete my comment and I won't respond again. cheers, --Itaj Sherman (talk) 11:46, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , the sources say that Epoch Times pushes QAnon. Whether they think it's "true" or not isn't relevant if they are known to push the theory. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:29, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Firefly • Sdrqaz
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ad Orientem
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Geschichte • Ryan Postlethwaite • Sabine's Sunbird • Wassupwestcoast



Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Evad37

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.

Technical news
 * Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the  and   rights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators.
 * When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present.

Arbitration
 * has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
 * A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
 * A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.

Miscellaneous
 * Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chris Martin (baseball)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chris Martin (baseball) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sewageboy -- Sewageboy (talk) 06:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chris Martin (baseball)
The article Chris Martin (baseball) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chris Martin (baseball) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sewageboy -- Sewageboy (talk) 07:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

ITN re-closing
Hi there, I decided to keep this away from others on ITN and write it here. I really don’t agree with your comment that there was a breach of neutrality in my closing. The nominator has come up with arguments that administrators engage in vote-counting and simultaneously post a blurb along with an ongoing item for the same story, which are valid points of discussion and contradict some of our basic principles. I never get influenced by the number of oppose votes and give weight on individual opinions if possible. In this case, the nominator presented valid arguments in the wrong place and in the wrong way, so my closing statement wasn’t merely a “consensus-will-not-develop-to-post” summary but also a guide on what to do with those arguments. Best regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:26, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , I cannot fathom why, after that discussion with comments made about it being a bad faith nomination, you would write While nominator’s argumentation is spot on and deserves attention. Best to close it neutrally and make a broader discussion on the appropriate talk page if you agree with the nominator's greater point. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Baltimore 2015 edits
Our race is human. Stating that race is involved is incorrect. Ethnicity is the appropriate term. Until people realize that our race is human and stop referring to ethnicity as race there will always be conflict among us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.69.184.59 (talk) 23:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Read Race (human categorization). And WP:RGW as well. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Your résumé
Hi, I noticed you edited an article I was editing at the same time (B. Benjamin), so I took a glance at your user page. Wow, your Wikipedia résumé is very impressive. An admin, almost 3,000 articles created, and all your other great stats. Plus, you like baseball a little bit. I just wanted to say... well done on eveything you've contributed to this project over the past 16 years. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:FDF2:3EB5:8751:7A62 (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I hope you like it here and WP:REGISTER an account. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. Wikipedia is lucky to have you. By the way, I made a few more edits to the Benjamin article. If you disagree with anything I did or see any room for improvement, feel free to change them as you see fit. Thanks. 2605:A000:FFC0:D8:FDF2:3EB5:8751:7A62 (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

"LGBTQ heads of government"
I see that lots of people have been eagerly adding this category to everyone from mayors to state legislators to God knows what all. You have been deleting them and I agree with you. (I noticed it because the mayor of my city was one of the ones so tagged.) Is there a conversation somewhere about exactly what constitutes a "head of government", or should we start one? Maybe the eager beavers should create a new category like "LGBTQ mayors"? -- MelanieN (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Maybe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_addition_of_bad_categories_by_Sarahlundell_and_refusal_to_communicate here]? -- MelanieN (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , I've got Annise Parker, Jane Castor, and Sarah McBride on my watchlist. It's really weird, I've counted six brand new accounts doing this, so I created an SPI for it. I'm pretty sure we already have the needed categories, such as Category:LGBT mayors of places in the United States.
 * It could be related to that user potentially, I'll take a look at that thread. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Connected accounts?
Hi, I refreshed my watchlist and saw that the exact same category had been added to two articles I created, both by accounts created in the last half hour. The two accounts are dedicated to adding the same categories. Should this be followed up as the behaviour is highly...coincidental. Just coming to you as you undid one of them and are experienced. Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , I've started an SPI for this (had no idea which account is the "master"). I'll add Sarahlundell to it. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Sarahlundell has been reported to ANI by another user Unknown Temptation (talk) 19:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Rick Herrscher MLB baseball player
I would like to the lead in writing the article for Rick Herrscher. I am Rick Herrscher’s son William Herrscher. My Father is still alive and I have his authorization and power of attorney to create and edit his public information, name and likeness. The photo posted with Hawaii Chiefs is not of Rick Herrscher. I have other photos of Dr. Herrscher with the New York Mets, SMU, and Hawaii Chiefs organization that I can publish.

Please help me take over publication of his Wikipedia page. Thank you, William T. Herrscher 972.333.3311, Dallas, Texas. WMHerrschman (talk) 04:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Wow, the 1962 Mets?! That must have been some team to be on. From a quick Google search, I can see that you're right about the photo. Your dad wore #45 with the Hawaii Hawks and that photo has #31. Apparently, that's Dale Wise in the photo. I'll make the correction. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bob Glenalvin
Hello! Your submission of Bob Glenalvin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Bagumba (talk) 10:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Presidents has an RFC
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States Presidents has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of National Baseball Commission
Hello! Your submission of National Baseball Commission at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <b style="color:#034503">MB</b> 06:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Phi Gamma Delta
The text that is being reduced isn't already small due to the infobox, so small is allowed. And the use of small here was after a significant discussion, (Phi Gamma Delta's policy on letters is fairly unique among GLOs and so the use of Phi Gamma Delta letters vs. FIJI were both placed there.Naraht (talk) 12:51, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , infoboxes reduce text size. MOS:SMALLFONT is not optional guidance: In no case should the resulting font size of any text drop below 85% of the page's default font size (i.e. 11.9 px in Vector skin or 10.8 px in Monobook). – Muboshgu (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Errol Robinson


The article Errol Robinson has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable minor league baseball player"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spanneraol (talk) 18:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.

Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 1) Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
 * 2) 🇨🇽 AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
 * 3) Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
 * 4) Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
 * 5) Vexilloid of the Roman Empire.svg Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
 * 6) Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
 * 7) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.

The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:49, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Actually she is
AOC is a far left extremist and conspiracy theorist. She supporist communism which is extreme. Be honest and fair. 23.28.58.17 (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Tell me you don't know what communism is without telling me you don't know what communism is... – Muboshgu (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Everything I don't like or understand is ~* ~* cO mM uN iSm ~* ~* PRAXIDICAE💕  17:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @Praxidicae or critical race theory. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Freddie Freeman
Hi M, could you look into semi-protecting Freddie Freeman? The article has been subject to a lot of recent edit warring against WP consensus primarily by IPs over adding his Canadian citizenship to the lead. See User talk:JDDJS for further information. I'm considering adding some version of that discussion to Freddie's article talk page in a few days so there's a central place to discuss this. Also, is there an established consensus either way at WP:BASEBALL on this issue? I wouldn't doubt it's come up before in some way. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 19:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , I'm not sure if we have one? If there is a consensus for his nationality, it'd probably be on his talk page, or its archives. Or, we may need to get feedback at BLP/N. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. What about the semi-protection? Is that something you want to stay out of? I can ask at RPP, but I figured I'd ask you first since sports and baseball can be "complicated". Thanks for whatever you can do. BilCat (talk) 19:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Semi-protected for a week. I won't try to impose one solution over another, but I will step in to stop that. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)


 * That's all I was asking for. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 20:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Manhattan
In a recent edit about Nikola Tesla, I undid your edit, my reason was unclear, sorry I didn't provide a more detailed reason. Manhattan may be well known to Americans, but perhaps not to people in other countries, and New York City is a much better known location, so I thought it would make more sense to write about it. MoJieCPD (talk) 13:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Actually, I would add Hotel New Yorker, but it would make the address too long. MoJieCPD (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * , I suspect Manhattan is commonly enough known outside of the U.S., but would be curious to figure out if I'm right or wrong on that. Anyway, NYC is too general. The five boroughs are huge on their own and so different from each other. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
 * hhhhh, I say this because I am not American and Manhattan is not very well known in my country, but I agree with what you say. MoJieCPD (talk) 05:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair point. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve José Herrera (catcher)
Hello, Muboshgu,

Thank you for creating José Herrera (catcher).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article needs more references in order to provide significant coverage for this article. See WP:SIGCOV References that have scores, lists, order of merit and video do not pass as reliable sources for WP:NSPORT. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - you may wish to read WP:NSPORT ) To meet notability requirements, one more reference with significant coverage are needful."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hmmm. Seems to me the best way to improve José Herrera would be to trade him to a team with a winning record. ;) BilCat (talk) 06:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Mark Robinson Edits
Muboshgu,

You recently undid several edits that I made to the Mark Robinson page. I would like for you to rethink these.

Overall, the page is clearly against Wikipedia standards of objectivity as it currently stands. Further, my additions were certainly unbiased - including statements such as that he formed the F.A.C.T.S. task force (without even including findings that could be controversial), that he is pro gun rights, and that he is pro parental rights. All of the additions were cited as well.

Given the current bias skew, these 3-4 sentences certainly offer just a little context to the discussion without even changing the general negative view that is being portrayed. So, I'm not sure how you can continue to object.

Please reconsider - I believe that I found a more than fair compromise.

Best, Info123ABC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Info123ABC (talk • contribs) 03:50, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * , we can discuss these potential changes. WP:BLPs need to be treated well. But I had to stop an WP:Edit warring to encourage discussion. Please go to Talk:Mark Robinson and start a new talk page section to bring up the changes you want made, with the reliable sources that support them. There, the community can agree on how to make them. I agree that we can add task forces that he heads up. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you, pleasantly surprised. I will do as you've outlined as time allows. Info123ABC (talk) 22:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Jumbo Brown
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 30 April 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:29, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Edit
Why did you undo my edit? 67.173.50.123 (talk) 20:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)


 * In addition to "billionaire businessman" not being an English phrase, it's redundant as the first paragraph says what his net worth is. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Reversions
No problem with this reversion (or really, any of the ones I just reverted). I was enforcing WP:BLOCKEVASION, but I understand that many of the edits may be viewed as productive otherwise. Thanks! <b style="color:#004C54">Eagles</b> <b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b> (C)  23:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , I realized that after I reverted the edit and saw. The edits I've looked at from that IP look good. I don't remember why that user got indeff'd, don't really care to go down memory lane. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I hope they stop evading their original block and take up the standard offer, their block-evading edits have mostly addressed the issues from their block. <b style="color:#004C54">Eagles</b> <b style="color:#004C54">24/7</b> (C)  23:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Took a look at their talk page... totally forgot that I gave them a co-nom credit on my Hard Hittin' Chris Gittens DYK. Transaction rumors... the bane of my existence in editing when the trade deadline and free agency approach. Reverting all of those edits is sadly what you had to do. If we could get them to turn away from the dark side (happy Star Wars Day) and down with proper sourcing techniques, they could be a real asset. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Colin M
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg David.Monniaux • Fribbler • Grue • Kpjas • West.andrew.g



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ks0stm

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news
 * Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
 * Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.

Technical news
 * The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
 * A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.

Arbitration
 * Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mallory McMorrow
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Newsom fossil fuel permits
hi! re: "it's not 2024 or 2045 yet so what's the point of this?" I think it's relevant because it is important climate policy (like, a lot of carbon emissions are at stake) and also in terms of how Newsom is perceived. The policy has been a significant topic of discussion (see https://fox5sandiego.com/news/local-news/city-council-votes-to-urge-newsom-to-end-fossil-fuel-permitting/ or https://www.mercurynews.com/2021/09/24/opinion-recall-may-be-over-but-climate-crisis-is-not-a-youth-perspective/) Zaelzo (talk) 04:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , well, I see that the second link is an opinion piece, so not a reliable source. What I see is blaming him for not phasing them out sooner when he said he'd still be issuing them until 2024, in violation of WP:NPOV. I suggest proposing it on the talk page to see if WP:CONSENSUS supports adding it. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ok, will do Zaelzo (talk) 04:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Request
Can you move Jake Walsh (baseball) to just Jake Walsh when you get a chance?-- Yankees10 01:21, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , ✅ – Muboshgu (talk) 01:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Can you also move Josh James (baseball player) back to Josh James (baseball)? I have no idea what this person was doing.-- Yankees10 01:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not know either. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:15, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

ITN recog.
Hi Muboshgu - hope you are well. Thanks for posting Andrew Symonds to the RD on the mainpage, but you've missed my ITN credit from my talkpage! I know it's only a minor thing, but if you have a spare second, another trophy-of-sorts would be great! :D Thank you.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 16:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Guess I missed the last one that wrapped around. It takes a village. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Too many deletions and reverts?
Hello! I am reaching out for guidance. I am doing the Central and Eastern Europe contest. I worked on the Graudenz page last night. I woke up and many things had been deleted/reverted including citations and facts that were not added by me. I re-did them manually and left a note on the person's talk page. That's when I noticed that many people on the talk page are complainig that the user has deleted their cited work.

If you search for the word "deleted", you'll see there are about 4-5 talk messages about content being deleted by Merangs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Merangs#Really,

I'm still new to Wiki so I looked around and found the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/

I submitted a new discussion, but now I can't find it there. I also left another note on the user's wall about the submitting them to the Admin noticeboard for review. The noticeboard said to reach out to an admin if possible. This is my first time doing anything like this, so any help is apprecaited. It seems like this person is deleting cited facts and not contributing to the cooperativeness of Wikipedia. If you see, sometimes people ask why the content was deleted and they reply "I do not recall" or they do not reply at all...

Any guidance is apprecaited. Maybe I'm wrong and the deletions/reversions are correct, but I'm pretty sure they aren't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheTypingKat (talk • contribs) 12:35, May 17, 2022 (UTC)
 * I see your post at WP:ANI, specifically at WP:ANI. I do agree that you and Merangs should try to discuss this, either on your user talk pages or at Talk:Grudziądz. You may be able to convince them that they are mistaken, or the other way around. If you two are unable to agree, then you may need to get third parties involved. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I left messages on Merangs page and Grudziadz page. I see a pattern of reverting articles with no explanation. I'm pretty new to Wikipedia, so I thought reporting it might be the best thing so more experienced people can reivew the user. TheTypingKat (talk) 20:05, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Request on The Players' Tribune page
Hi Muboshgu, I'm M and I work with Minute Media. I noticed you had done a lot of work on the Derek Jeter page (which looks great!) and was wondering if you'd be interested in the request I made at The Players' Tribune page since Jeter founded it? I did my best to make sure the requests are backed by reliable sourcing and are neutral in tone, especially with the advertising tag on the article. I've tried several other editors and WikiProjects but received no responses. I won't make any changes due to my conflict of interest, so I'd really appreciate the help! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 21:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , I'm on vacation right now, and only just popping in. I'm not going to have the time to look at anything substantive for the next week. I'll try to remember to check it out then. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That would be wonderful, thank you so much! Enjoy your vacation! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 21:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Muboshgu! I hope you had a nice vacation. I was wondering if you'd had a chance to take a look at the edit I requested on The Players' Tribune page? I'd really appreciate the help! M at MinuteMedia (talk) 20:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, I've forgotten. I'll check it out now. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Rōki Sasaki
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)