User talk:MuchAdoA

August 2019
Please refrain from making major edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Jennifer Aniston, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a major change. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 05:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

An extended welcome
Hi MuchAdoA. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 17:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Toni Collette
I've done a PR for this article. Have fun fixing it up.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I've spent a fair bit of time improving the article according to the PR, which you asked for. I suggest you continue that work. It needs more work on balancing the article, improving the refs (including providing more archive-urls for as many as you can) and the formatting of its text. It also needs more work on ¶ sizes. Good luck.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toni Collette
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Toni Collette you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LM150 -- LM150 (talk) 13:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Toni Collette
The article Toni Collette you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Toni Collette for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LM150 -- LM150 (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)