User talk:Muchfaster

RE: Philip Glenister Forum...
Thats fine, thanks for doing that. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 17:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: PG Site...
Well, on Wikipedia it is a rule that on articles you do not include fansites. Because usually these sights have little to no encyclopedic content, due to a fansite being set up in the hope that it exsists to bring fans together to chat, swap stories etc. And you see everything on Wikipedia should be kept encyclopedic, such as the fansite to his actual website etc. I'm sorry if you feel that I am over exerting myself taking off these sites, but at the end of the day - these are the rules. I hope we reach an understanding, thanks. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 17:54, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

RE: RE PG Site
I dont make the rules friend, its just every editors duty to civilly enforce them best they can. The thing is, is that the Philip Glenister sites (some of them) are fansites which even have it in the title I am willing to review all the sites, which I will do now. But I'm afraid some will have to go, the ones which are in breach of Wikipedia policy anyway. And by the way to reply to someone elses message if it is of the same subject their is no need to make a new heading each time, you just put your message under the related piece of text in relation to your comments. Also I see that you have not recieved the "warm welcome" template on your usertalk page. Thanks, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 18:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 18:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I have included your fansites, in a seperate list. I should not be doing this though, be grateful. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 18:56, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Happy now? Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 19:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome. All the best. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 19:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it.  C t j f 8 3 Talk 16:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

The links are gone which I fully support to the hilt. THEY ARE IN CONTREVENTION OF WIKIPEDIA RULES, you may think my caps is due to be not assuming good faith, this is not the case. But you do not seem to understand me. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 17:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I got mixed up with another conversation, ignore the bit about you having cheek I really am sorry. It was nothing to do with you, back to the thing about the links: I was being nice letting them be kept, but in all honesty I should have just removed them. Now another editor has removed them (with no persuasion from me) If I go re-adding them, he will realise I was breaking the rules by letting them be put on, I'm sorry I just dont see what I can do to help you. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 17:56, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

How dare you accuse me of orchestrating another username and deleting the links. How dare you, never visit my userpage again. On wikipedia you are not allowed to post stupid utter waste of time, crap links. Thank you very much, dont you dare visit my talkpage again. I forbid you. Never contact me again. Dont accuse me of making another username just to take these links off. What do you mean higher than me? Wikipedia does not have a ranking system, I suggest you do some growing up pretty damn quick, you obviously dont understand the stupidity of your message. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 09:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Three users have removed thema nd gave good reasons, see the Philip Glenister talk page for more information. Like it or not, these sites are NOT going on the article. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 09:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Whats all this about the deviation of the point towards The Bill? See the Philip Glenister talkpage for the reasons, I am not answerable to you. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 09:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Civility
Welcome to Wikipedia! Please try to assume good faith and be civil when challenging other users about their edits - these are two of the core planks of Wikipedia, and they both make it easier to reach a fair consensus or compromise about a disputed issue. --McGeddon (talk) 10:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Hang on a minute, this is not about scoring points. This has been demonstrated in three seperate users, that have no personal affiliation with each other taking off your links. What is the chances of three people who have no personal ties victimising you? Also, rules are rules, if you want to edit Wikipedia the editors have to help enforce the rules. Everyone helps each other. Plus, I dont know about The Bill article I will have to check up on it and see if the links are in contrevention of anything. Also, I did not wish to fall out with you, I have explained to you so many times in blatant politeness why the links are not allowed, what more can I do? Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 10:20, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Also, if you dont mind me suggesting. I think you should show some maturity on the matter, and take the outlook of you win some, you lose some, just the way it goes. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs) ☺ 10:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)