User talk:Muchosucko

User_talk:Muchosucko/Archive1

Your userpage
Please change or at least drastically resize the image on your userpage. While Wikipedia is not censored, an image like this should (by the principle of least surprise) not appear in unexpected places, like on your userpage. (You could move it to a subpage like User:Muchosucko/Vulva and link to that subpage, or just link to the image). Some people browse Wikipedia from work or other places where images like this might get them in trouble, and there is no need to do so. I also fail to see how the image says anything about you as a Wikipedian. See WP:USER. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 04:41, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Architecture Wikiproject
Hi. Great work with all your architecture and design edits. I was wondering if you might be interested in joining WikiProject Architecture. Also we've been revamping the Architecture Portal and nominations to Portal:Architecture/Selected picture candidates and Portal:Architecture/Selected article candidates will always be welcome.--Mcginnly | Natter 10:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Sign up at WikiProject_Architecture

please do not ban me i'm only a mortal

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mercedes benz ml350 silver lighting.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mercedes benz ml350 silver lighting.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

WTF??
I dont live in fontana douchebag, Im from Rancho!!!!!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.199.50.20 (talk) 16:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

WTF??
I dont live in fontana douchebag, Im from Rancho!!!!!!!!! (63.199.50.20 16:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC))

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Happiness-intelligence-lisasimpson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Happiness-intelligence-lisasimpson.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Chop suey
You might want to look in to Chop suey and its history. User:Asugar2 added a bunch of very low-quality material, which I culled (in fact, I'm not even sure that long-term the little that's left should remain). User:Gisling restored his material. --Macrakis (talk) 14:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Super chair suspension for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super chair suspension is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Super chair suspension until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ( talk ) 19:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)