User talk:Mudassar183

Welcome!
Hello, Domaauthor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as DomaWatch (Alliance Defending Freedom), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you thru the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Phuzion (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock|I have choose to write for the marriage of same-sex couples, because I have the knowledge of the previous cases, that's why I set my username to doma author, I lived with the same-sex couples they are lovely people, but people discriminate them, I know what they are going through, To be honest with you, I want to defend them, and I cannot just change my username and please restore my article, I was writing from days, I can remove the external links, the title of your choice, but you have to unblock my username and restore the article, I am a new user so I need one more chance, laws are mandatory on every platform but there are some precedents and case laws which can challenge the laws of any platform, this is a platform of information, My contribution was without any advertisement, defamatory statement or others, If you want to remove the backlinks then I will do it}

Speedy deletion nomination of DomaWatch (Alliance Defending Freedom)


A tag has been placed on DomaWatch (Alliance Defending Freedom), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Phuzion (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Domaauthor, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.'''A username should not be promotional, appear to represent a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. However, you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87". You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Domaauthor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:44, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, This article does not involve any conflict of interest, I am contributing articles for the human rights and the betterment of society. If you want me to remove any external links, please let me know about it. I am not promoting anyone, I am just writing in the spare time due to this covid-19 situation. Domaauthor (talk) 16:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Please don't post messages while logged out. Despite what you have said above, it's not clear to me what link you have with the organisation, please clarify, since you might still have a conflict of interest.

Also read the following regarding writing an article:


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Your text had no in-line references at all, so we have no idea where what you have written is coming from
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. Your entire text actually talking about your organisation was DomaWatch was created by the help of Alliance Defence fund to keep legislators and lawyers informed of current laws and litigation, including marital rights. The rest of your text was a discussion about marriage. From what you have written, your organisation has no verifiable headquarters, membership, staff, income or expenditure, difficult to see how it meets the notability criteria. If it doesn't it won't get an article.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your entire text is telling us about US law rather than the organisation you are supposed to be writing about, and is riddled with opinions and promo The family is the foundation of a strong society, therefore marriage needs to be protected... But proponents of same-sex marriage consider that understanding marriage against homosexuals is a form of irrational prejudice because it allows them to marry someone of the same sex and the government benefits associated with civil marriage. Prevents being eligible for In this view, beliefs about the upbringing of children and their upbringing are flawed or, at the very least, insufficient bases to define marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman... one of the most disturbing developments... Alliance defense freedom organizes to help people especially when it comes to human rights and management, therefore, ADF launches a campaign in many states for the rights of a same-sex couple, gay and lesbian, and helps legally to solve the problems.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above.

I can't see the point of restoring the text because most of it is discussing US marriage law, not Doma Watch, supposedly the topic of the article. You said The main motive to write this article is to inform the lawyers and the people that the supreme court has given the decree in favor of the rights of same-sex couples, so the people cannot able to harass them what is that if it's not promoting a point of view? Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, is not our job to provide your organisation with a platform or Right great wrongs Also, I can't see where you have created a new account Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:03, 22 May 2020 (UTC)