User talk:Mudforce

Annika Sorenstam
Thank you for your excellent cleanup work on Annika Sorenstam. Do you know about Wikiproject Golf? I just found out about this. It looks like they could use some more people who are working on LPGA and LET articles and some more people who are from outside the U.S. You might be interested in it. Crunch 12:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Seon Hwa Leee - stub class?
I'm curious why you graded the Seon Hwa Lee article as Stub Class. I admit I was negligent in removing the stub tag when expanding the article, but the article is fairly complete. I think it warranted a higher rating in both the quality and importance scale. Crunch 11:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Golfer Infobox
Great job adding them. Do you think it would be wise to change all golfers with the current infobox to the one we're putting up? Or would that be to controversial? Perhaps we should reach a consensus on some talk page? Let me know what you think, because frankly, the official golfer infobox is bad. Supertigerman 19:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Vote on Merger of Annika Sörenstam at the Colonial into Annika Sorenstam
Hi Mudforce, I've proposed merging Annika Sörenstam at the Colonial into Annika Sörenstam. There is a poll to vote on the merger on Talk:Annika Sörenstam. --Crunch 21:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Tiger Woods citations
Wow. Fantastic job. Brilliant. If I knew how to give barnstars I so would right now. Keep it up. You're awesome. Supertigerman 15:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Annika Sörenstam reviewed
hi hi Mudforce. upon a light read of Annika Sörenstam, goooood job of references. i love refs, love em! though, i should say the second paragraph of the article - all those sentences need refs. :) there are a whole bunch of numbers, dates, money amounts and rankings in this article; i'm not sure what the manual of style (WP:MOS) for all of those, but the sheer amount of them stings my brain a bit. please standardize if they aren't already to reduce the swelling. the Professional Career section needs a separate article and a summary section in Annika's. saying 'she won this, she won that, got this, got that' over and over again gets a little tired. i also noticed from this approx one kajillion abbreviations for tournaments and awards. it is second nature to skim around a wikipedia article, and with all those abbreviations you don't know where the heck you are or if you missed a previous sentence explaining it. that end of the article template above the categories could be prettier. finally, for ultimate-ease-of-eyes, read, dive, consume this guide: it will help soooo much and holy crap does it help an articles feel. hope i've helped! :) JoeSmack Talk 20:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Annika Sorenstam at the Colonial merged
I've completed the merge -- actually only about one sentence and a reference. All else was there. Also, let me know if you'd like help cleaning up the Annika Sorenstam article in accordance with the suggestions above. It's kind of your baby, but I can do some work on it if you want another set of hands. --Crunch 01:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Monobook.js
I have responded to this one on the Outriggr discussion page. :: Kevinalewis  : (Talk Page) /(Desk)  12:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Service awards


Just to let you know, you qualify for this. This award is determined strictly by your time on Wikipedia and edit count. Congrats! -- Broken Sphere 23:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Golf
Hi I thought that a way to further improve the golf articles on Wikipedia is for the whole project to work together towards a goal. An example of this could be a certain number of good articles in so many months, or to create the project's first ever featured article. If you are interested, come to the talk page and discuss it. And hopefully through this the project can continue to work towards several goals in the near future. Grover 10:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

New LPGA players photos
Hello, there's bunch of new high quality photos uploaded from flickr into wiki commons, authored by Keith Allison. They can be found in the 'LPGA photos taken by Keith Allison' commons category. Please consider embeding them into existing players' wiki profiles and update this page accordingly. I've sent this message to User:Crunch, User:Dale Arnett, and User:Giants2008 so please synchronize :). BR, Wmigda (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

ALOHA!
hello mudforce! I'm user Hollstien and I have a question for you .my brother (user:CitizenofEarth) is trying to perfect his "wikipet" creation and i thought i'd ask you for him. he wants it to be like the cookie, where you type and it pops up. Do you have any ideas? Thanks.Hollstein I love Pizza! 11:05, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Mudforce! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Florence Descampe -
 * 2) Val Skinner -

Female golfers photos
Hello, I think I've finished adding and processing photos of european players taken during 2009 Women's British Open. You can find them here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:LPGA_photos_taken_by_Wojciech_Migda. I've added some already to the infoboxes, but still there are plenty for players who don't have their wiki pages yet - maybe it is a good opportunity to create those. Anyway, please take a look and maybe you will make use of them on en.wiki. Cheers, Wmigda (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Annika Sörenstam
Annika Sörenstam has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 04:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)